Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 382 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
19051 SASVBC 18-Rhyenne 1513 11-12 48% 18 HI
19052 HIC 15-N cinda 1513 18-20 45% 15 UT
19053 Premier 13-Red 1513 14-12 47% 13 TX
19054 Athens Elite 17-1 1513 6-5 55% 17 OH
19055 KIVA 13 KIVA Mandy (PR) (32) 1513 3-1 75% 13 KY
19056 Dynamite Adidas 17-2 1513 23-30 43% 17 MI
19057 TX IMPACT 13-Hybrid navy 1513 10-7 59% 13 TX
19058 CVA 12 1513 13-13 50% 12 LA
19059 CMASS Academy 14-Black 1513 2-1 67% 14 MA
19060 FQP Elite 13-1 1513 8-8 50% 13 TX
19061 ONE Volleyball Academy G17-1 1513 6-5 55% 17 KS
19062 Lady Lakers 17 1513 6-3 60% 17 ND
19063 PV SILVER 12 1513 2-2 50% 12 IA
19064 Katy United 14 Navy 1513 28-16 62% 14 TX
19065 Coast VA 13-1 1513 27-31 47% 13 VA
19066 Aus Velocity 15-2 emerald 1513 20-18 53% 15 TX
19067 BAVC 15-National allan 1513 24-25 49% 15 CA
19068 Diablo 16-2 green 1513 19-21 48% 16 CA
19069 LES 16 Kinsley 1513 18-12 56% 16 AL
19070 Hunter's 16-Hector 1513 3-1 75% 16 FL
19071 Miller 14-Gold 1513 14-10 58% 14 OH
19072 PVA 12 Molten 1513 9-12 43% 12 MO
19073 MVVC 14-Amy 1513 5-3 56% 14 WY
19074 Coyotes Pink 15 1513 6-4 60% 15 MN
19075 Elevate Athletics 14-Nike 1513 7-14 33% 14 UT
19076 Avalanche Volleyball Club 18 Avalanche Casie 1513 16-14 53% 18 MI
19077 CMASS EDGE 14-White 1513 19-19 50% 14 MA
19078 ReNew VBC 18 1513 9-6 60% 18 NY
19079 FSJ 12-2 regional plus 1513 20-17 54% 12 AR
19080 Laredo Unity 13u Gold 1513 11-5 69% 13 TX
19081 VC United 18-2 elite 1513 12-17 41% 18 IL
19082 JVA 14-Regional 1513 4-2 67% 14 FL
19083 850 Elite Volleyball Club 18-1 1513 9-14 39% 18 AL
19084 MichioChicago 11-Blue 1513 3-2 60% 11 IL
19085 CinciVB Acad 10-1 1513 2-2 50% 10 OH
19086 All Out 16-Black/rachael 1513 19-18 51% 16 WA
19087 CITIES 16-Trevor 1513 26-21 55% 16 VA
19088 GCVC 14-CHELSIE 1513 13-11 54% 14 IN
19089 Volitude 16-Red 1513 24-15 62% 16 CA
19090 Mindset Premier 17-Black 1513 23-13 64% 17 IL
19091 TrailblazersVBC 16-R mault 1513 4-2 67% 16 OH
19092 Platinum 14-Peak 1513 9-15 32% 14 UT
19093 HVC 15-2 sparks 1513 3-2 60% 15 ON
19094 Spark 13-1 juan 1513 19-22 46% 13 CA
19095 DCVA 14-2 thelia 1513 18-18 50% 14 NM
19096 Allegro 17-South black 1513 28-26 52% 17 NJ
19097 Crank It 14-Silver 1513 19-11 63% 14 MI
19098 Aim High 16 Aim High Danielle (MI) 1513 23-14 62% 16
19099 VVB 15-Annie 1513 7-5 58% 15 GA
19100 NJVBC 14-Blue hawks 1513 9-5 64% 14 NJ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.