2025-2026 Season — Page 381 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19001 | NC Intensity 15-Ashley | 1514 | 22-13 | 63% | 15 | NC |
| 19002 | Impact 16-Makayla | 1514 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | MI |
| 19003 | Kokoro Volleyball 16 Nvy | 1514 | 35-18 | 66% | 16 | MN |
| 19004 | ORANGE CRUSH PURPLE 13 | 1514 | 1-2 | 33% | 13 | IA |
| 19005 | Top Flight 11-Psi sp | 1514 | 4-2 | 67% | 11 | IL |
| 19006 | Nebraska ONE 13-Illusion | 1514 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | NE |
| 19007 | AVC CLE 13-Black | 1514 | 9-10 | 47% | 13 | OH |
| 19008 | Club Fusion 13-Heat spring | 1514 | 9-4 | 69% | 13 | IL |
| 19009 | Storm 16-White-amy | 1514 | 3-1 | 75% | 16 | CO |
| 19010 | NKVC 14-Streeter | 1514 | 8-12 | 40% | 14 | WY |
| 19011 | Monon 17-2e cyclones | 1514 | 29-50 | 37% | 17 | IN |
| 19012 | GCVA 13-1 coast | 1514 | 15-13 | 54% | 13 | TX |
| 19013 | 575 15-Wsnb teria | 1514 | 30-34 | 47% | 15 | GA |
| 19014 | ClubOne 16 Gold | 1514 | 18-18 | 50% | 16 | CO |
| 19015 | Cap City 14-Gold | 1514 | 20-19 | 51% | 14 | NC |
| 19016 | Sequoia Crush 16-Navy | 1514 | 17-12 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 19017 | OC Lady Elite 18-Black | 1514 | 21-17 | 55% | 18 | NY |
| 19018 | AVC Nebraska 15-Black | 1514 | 4-4 | 50% | 15 | NE |
| 19019 | Academy 15-R diamondback | 1514 | 24-26 | 48% | 15 | IN |
| 19020 | H Skyline 16-Gray | 1514 | 16-15 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 19021 | WI Flight 14-White | 1514 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | WI |
| 19022 | FW Fire 14-Springtown | 1514 | 9-7 | 41% | 14 | TX |
| 19023 | Over The Top Volleyball Club 15-Elite | 1514 | 6-7 | 46% | 15 | CA |
| 19024 | Mission 4:10 Volleyball 14 Cornerstone (Isa. 28:16) (CH) (12) | 1514 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | |
| 19025 | MAVA 17-Elite | 1514 | 45-35 | 56% | 17 | KY |
| 19026 | Rise 18-Purple | 1514 | 14-22 | 39% | 18 | CO |
| 19027 | GCVC 11 Silver | 1514 | 11-13 | 46% | 11 | OH |
| 19028 | NW Jrs 13-Blue | 1514 | 24-34 | 41% | 13 | WA |
| 19029 | Hammer Head Volleyball Club Ridgway 15U | 1514 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | PA |
| 19030 | KOKUA 15 | 1514 | 14-20 | 41% | 15 | WA |
| 19031 | Edge Elite 15-Silver | 1514 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | PA |
| 19032 | Metro VBC 13-Black | 1514 | 32-23 | 56% | 13 | IN |
| 19033 | Instinct 14-Wild 1 | 1514 | 14-9 | 56% | 14 | TX |
| 19034 | TEJAS 13-Red josh | 1514 | 11-16 | 39% | 13 | TX |
| 19035 | AJ 13-Red | 1514 | 23-20 | 51% | 13 | LA |
| 19036 | Arkansas Jrs 15-2 | 1514 | 8-6 | 57% | 15 | AR |
| 19037 | PAEVA 16-Black | 1514 | 24-21 | 53% | 16 | PA |
| 19038 | SCVC 13-Goon | 1513 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | OH |
| 19039 | Countdown 17 Select | 1513 | 30-22 | 58% | 17 | FL |
| 19040 | Chicago Red Stars 15 Red Stars Chi-Town | 1513 | 24-20 | 52% | 15 | IL |
| 19041 | RIptide 12-1 | 1513 | 17-16 | 52% | 12 | CA |
| 19042 | PAO STL 13-Rda black | 1513 | 39-26 | 60% | 13 | MO |
| 19043 | ID Impact 12-Jen | 1513 | 10-8 | 56% | 12 | WA |
| 19044 | PAVC - NC 14-Emerald | 1513 | 21-19 | 53% | 14 | NC |
| 19045 | H Hawks HHVBC 12-1g | 1513 | 3-3 | 50% | 12 | IA |
| 19046 | ARVC 15-White adidas | 1513 | 20-18 | 53% | 15 | NM |
| 19047 | MOJO Volleyball Academy 15-Pink | 1513 | 9-13 | 41% | 15 | MD |
| 19048 | JET 16 ALLEN | 1513 | 18-20 | 47% | 16 | TX |
| 19049 | 417 MoJrs 15-Nat royal | 1513 | 19-16 | 54% | 15 | MO |
| 19050 | PVA 15-Molten | 1513 | 11-12 | 48% | 15 | MO |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.