Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 380 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18951 NC GOLD 18-1 1514 17-19 47% 18 NC
18952 ELITE NEXT LEVEL 13-1 1514 13-10 54% 13 TX
18953 KVBC 14-S white 1514 14-16 47% 14 MN
18954 City Juniors 12 Navy 1514 20-17 53% 12 TX
18955 Raptors Sara 17 1514 8-6 53% 17 UT
18956 Watertown 13-Blue 1514 2-2 50% 13 MN
18957 River City 14-Blue 1514 11-11 50% 14 WI
18958 NW Elite 12-3 red 1514 23-16 59% 12 OR
18959 REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 14 REACH RISE (CA) 1514 4-1 67% 14 PA
18960 FC Elite 16 Adidas 1514 13-8 62% 16 WI
18961 Legacy 14-Select 1514 3-1 75% 14 SC
18962 South County 17-Gold 1514 35-19 65% 17 RI
18963 Synergy 16-Aluminum 1514 36-22 60% 16 PA
18964 DS Elite 11-Rise 1514 13-7 62% 11 TX
18965 Spiketown VBC 15-3 1514 3-2 60% 15 OH
18966 ECVC 12-Pink 1514 14-12 54% 12 VA
18967 Club Fire 12-Green 1514 7-4 64% 12 MN
18968 Belle Plaine 16-1 1514 7-5 58% 16 MN
18969 Knights 12-Black 1514 4-3 44% 12 IA
18970 Shenandoah Surge Volleyball Club 12 12U SHENANDOAH SURGE WV (CH) 1514 14-9 56% 12 MD
18971 SERVE VBC 15-1 1514 5-5 50% 15 OH
18972 X-Factor Volleyball 15-2 1514 33-27 52% 15 VA
18973 Easton Valley 12-S 1514 1-1 25% 12 IA
18974 Avoli 15-F oneida 1514 10-10 50% 15 PR
18975 ID Crush 13-Orange 1514 27-32 45% 13 ID
18976 Texas Storm 12-Blue 1514 9-8 38% 12 TX
18977 United 13-2 GJ 1514 6-5 55% 13 CO
18978 Spikezone 17 1514 2-3 40% 17 TX
18979 Dubuque Force 15-S 1514 2-2 50% 15 IA
18980 SA Juniors 11 Carolina 1514 8-6 47% 11 TX
18981 Mt. Lake Panthers 14-1 1514 2-1 40% 14 MN
18982 Mountain State Storm Volleyball Club 15 15 Rain 1514 8-6 57% 15 WV
18983 ITVC 15-Power (HI) 1514 8-8 50% 15 CA
18984 EP STRiVE VBC 13-S black 1514 27-24 53% 13 TX
18985 Carolina Sky 15-Elite 1514 25-27 48% 15 SC
18986 Guns Up VBC 15 Elite 1514 18-19 49% 15 TX
18987 LHVA 14-Black 1514 3-2 60% 14 NY
18988 COAST 14-R3 tessa 1514 11-10 52% 14 CA
18989 Tribe 16-Regional red 1514 20-15 57% 16 FL
18990 Networks Academy 17-1 1514 13-16 45% 17 AL
18991 Dakota Thunder 16-Purple 1514 4-4 44% 16 ND
18992 Decatur Force 14 Royal 1514 15-13 54% 14 IN
18993 Four1Nine Xtreme 13 13-Vorst (OV) (10) 1514 4-2 67% 13 OH
18994 Apex 18 1514 2-5 29% 18 UT
18995 Jellys 15-Black 1514 31-18 63% 15 FL
18996 Actsports 15-Edwards/wood 1514 13-10 57% 15 VA
18997 Northern Impact 16-Ua 1514 9-5 64% 16 MN
18998 NC Intensity 15-Ashley 1514 22-13 63% 15 NC
18999 Impact 16-Makayla 1514 3-2 60% 16 MI
19000 Kokoro Volleyball 16 Nvy 1514 35-18 66% 16 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.