Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 379 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18901 Elevation 16-Regional 1515 25-19 57% 16 CO
18902 Epic United 13-National 1515 30-19 61% 13 IL
18903 VCN 15-White 1515 7-8 47% 15 NE
18904 208 U11 Elite 1515 18-21 46% 11 ID
18905 VPJ 15-Black 1515 6-14 26% 15
18906 808AC 11-Jacie 1515 22-29 43% 11 HI
18907 Jefferson Volleyball club 12 JVC ELITE 1515 9-9 50% 12 SC
18908 CJVA 15 Onyx 1515 33-44 43% 15 NJ
18909 SAJO 16 1515 10-5 67% 16 MN
18910 Evolve 14-Red 1515 11-15 42% 14 CA
18911 Wakulla Aces 15-1 1515 10-5 67% 15 FL
18912 PAO Elevate 18-1 bill 1515 11-4 73% 18 CA
18913 Houston Force 13-Jedi 1515 10-8 53% 13 TX
18914 Summit 17-Orange elite 1515 20-21 49% 17 IN
18915 Tstreet 17-Carson 1515 29-28 51% 17 CA
18916 Top Select 13-Top yellow 1515 42-30 58% 13 FL
18917 RVA 14-Walker 1515 11-18 38% 14 IA
18918 1W 14 Silver 1515 13-8 62% 14 WI
18919 InnovativeVC 11-1raymond 1515 6-5 55% 11 PR
18920 RTR JO VB 11 1515 2-3 40% 11 SD
18921 WVC 14-Primetime 1515 9-8 50% 14 MN
18922 Locked In Volleyball Club 14 14U National Locked In 1515 17-13 57% 14 AL
18923 FVC 14-Surge 1515 29-20 58% 14 MD
18924 CLBRK 18-1 1515 12-8 60% 18 WI
18925 LUVC 16-Nationals 1515 11-19 37% 16 NC
18926 CJV 14-Select white 1515 22-23 49% 14 NC
18927 AZ RISE Volleyball Club 14 RISE Gold 1515 1-3 25% 14 UT
18928 Just Dig It 13-Black 1515 20-16 56% 13 CO
18929 Club Rampage Volleyball 13 Rampage Maddy 1515 4-4 25% 13 UT
18930 DIG 11-Blue 1515 7-3 54% 11 TX
18931 Waupaca Fire 10 1515 5-4 56% 10 WI
18932 HAILI 10 1515 3-2 60% 10 HI
18933 Nona Volleyball Academy 13 13 FUTURE 1515 1-1 50% 13 FL
18934 TVO 13-Blaze 1515 27-18 60% 13 MI
18935 Black Hills Juniors NH 14-1 1515 4-5 44% 14 WY
18936 Attack 15-2 1515 3-2 60% 15 MI
18937 K2 15-Redbacks 1515 24-21 53% 15 TN
18938 NLVA 12-Mint 1515 3-2 60% 12 NC
18939 NVA 16-Premier hector 1515 35-27 56% 16 FL
18940 Warren Sixpack 13-Red 1515 14-13 52% 13 NJ
18941 Church&Dodge 15-5 1515 2-1 67% 15 IL
18942 LAVA Islands 16 Molten 1515 20-21 49% 16 CA
18943 Metro Elite Volleyball Club NL 15 1515 3-4 43% 15
18944 Next 13-White 1515 10-9 53% 13 OH
18945 The Edge 17-Black (GL) 1514 13-12 52% 17 IL
18946 Utah Ice Volleyball Club 17 Utah Ice Tyler 1514 2-2 50% 17 UT
18947 Sky High 14-Cl spr 1 1514 2-2 50% 14 IL
18948 Arkansas Titans 14u 1514 21-17 54% 14 TN
18949 ARVBC 16-Black 1514 4-4 50% 16 GA
18950 AZ REV 12-Elite 1514 36-42 46% 12 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.