Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 378 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18851 BASH VC 15-1 1515 2-2 40% 15 AL
18852 CT Juniors 14-National 1515 12-20 38% 14 CT
18853 SBC Impact 16-Black 1515 12-9 40% 16 LA
18854 Black Rock Mike 16 1515 11-6 52% 16 UT
18855 XTREME VBC 13-Red 1515 12-13 48% 13 WI
18856 Crossfire 15-2 1515 37-39 49% 15 MN
18857 Club North Volleyball KC 13-1 1515 5-6 29% 13 MO
18858 IMUA UVC 13-Silver 1515 10-2 83% 13 CA
18859 SMASH Raiders 17-1 1515 2-5 29% 17 OH
18860 KVA 15-Ron 1515 14-17 45% 15 HI
18861 Maroon Belles 13-Brian 1515 6-3 67% 13 CO
18862 Trinity 15 Blaze 1515 26-22 54% 15 FL
18863 Ozark Juniors 13-Reg plus 1515 27-18 60% 13 AR
18864 MJVA 13-National bl-so 1515 21-17 55% 13 TN
18865 ABBA 15-1 1515 3-2 60% 15 OH
18866 Raptors 12-Maquette 1515 7-4 64% 12 UT
18867 JVB 13 Maroon 1515 7-6 54% 13 MN
18868 Dinos 15 1515 4-3 57% 15 WA
18869 Lawrence Landsharks 12-2 1515 4-3 57% 12 KS
18870 Mt. Hood 15-1 timberline 1515 29-25 54% 15 OR
18871 Hollywood Inspire 18-1 1515 6-4 60% 18 OH
18872 Fusion 14-2 1515 15-10 60% 14 MN
18873 ITVC 18-1 1515 0-0 0% 18 WA
18874 Mass Pats 18-1 respect 1515 21-11 58% 18 MA
18875 CHANUTE JUNIORS-BRAVE VBC 13-1 1515 4-1 67% 13 KS
18876 TFVBC 16-1 1515 27-30 47% 16 TN
18877 SNVF 15 CYCLONE 1515 26-30 46% 15 WA
18878 Arbuckle 14-Kj 1515 3-2 60% 14 CA
18879 Flying Fish 12 1515 11-6 65% 12 FL
18880 Hutchinson 11-1 1515 2-1 67% 11 MN
18881 360 18-Kaos 1515 7-10 35% 18 NV
18882 Sicangu 14-Teal 1515 2-2 50% 14 SD
18883 Areté 16-Steel ethos 1515 32-19 58% 16 TX
18884 ASVC 14-N1e 1515 30-39 43% 14 AZ
18885 COV FRISCO BAY 18-S 1515 6-1 86% 18 NV
18886 Red Slam 11 1515 9-10 47% 11 IN
18887 310VBC 16-S mylah 1515 18-9 67% 16 CA
18888 EVA 13-Grey 1515 22-14 61% 13 AR
18889 Plymouth Volleyball Club 14 1515 14-7 67% 14 IN
18890 Oly Reign 14-Blue 1515 21-17 55% 14 WA
18891 MAVA 13-Elite 1515 35-33 51% 13 KY
18892 XP 12-Spring red 1515 3-1 60% 12 IL
18893 ECJVC 14-Select jackson 1515 8-7 53% 14 NC
18894 CVC 16-Red 1515 9-8 53% 16 FL
18895 SynergyForce 13-Red 1515 12-15 44% 13 CA
18896 WCA 16-1 1515 2-1 50% 16 MN
18897 Elevation 16-Regional 1515 25-19 57% 16 CO
18898 Epic United 13-National 1515 30-19 61% 13 IL
18899 VCN 15-White 1515 7-8 47% 15 NE
18900 208 U11 Elite 1515 18-21 46% 11 ID
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.