Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 377 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18801 Zoom 13-1 michelle 1516 13-6 68% 13 KS
18802 West Coast 16-Laura 1516 3-3 50% 16 CA
18803 Aspire NW 16-2 beaverton 1516 22-18 55% 16 OR
18804 BC Rise 15-Adidas 1516 13-10 57% 15 TX
18805 FSJ 13-3 regional plus 1516 19-12 61% 13 AR
18806 Top Flight 15 Theta 1516 35-23 60% 15 IL
18807 SJVC 13-1 1516 6-10 38% 13 FL
18808 HVVC 11-Purple 1516 7-3 70% 11 MI
18809 Santa Fe Storm 15-2 seth 1516 3-1 43% 15 CO
18810 Kokoro 16-Teal 1516 15-14 52% 16 OH
18811 South Bay 16-Black 1516 18-18 50% 16 NY
18812 MN Select 10-2 1516 11-10 52% 10 MN
18813 Club Legacy 13-Charlie 1516 10-10 50% 13 NE
18814 SRJ 13-Select 1516 6-7 46% 13 WA
18815 TUV 11-Green 1516 3-2 50% 11 TX
18816 Refine 12 Refine Singleton 1516 4-1 80% 12 AL
18817 Southern Alabama Volleyball Academy (SAVA) 13 SAVA Alpacas 1516 10-14 42% 13 AL
18818 DCVC 12-Regional 1516 11-10 48% 12 IA
18819 Solon Spartan 11-Orange 1516 2-1 50% 11 IA
18820 Platinum 12-Summit 1516 7-6 47% 12 UT
18821 FEVA 16-Kate 1516 31-34 48% 16 FL
18822 Phoenix Rising 13 Amie 1516 16-14 53% 13 TN
18823 AVBC 15-Elite white 1516 33-25 57% 15 MI
18824 Buckeye 13-Red elite 1516 25-25 50% 13 OH
18825 Fallon Wave 13-5 1516 3-2 60% 13 NV
18826 Idaho LUV 15-Lynea 1516 7-13 30% 15 ID
18827 Nebraska ONE 13-Black diamonds 1516 11-13 46% 13 NE
18828 S.W.A.T. 12 U11 SWAT Peery 1515 2-1 50% 12 UT
18829 MEM METRO 15-E wht 1515 28-20 58% 15 TN
18830 La Grange VA 12-S 1515 7-4 64% 12 TX
18831 Pantera 14-Fletcher 1515 23-20 53% 14 IN
18832 540 VB 17 Navy 1515 27-21 54% 17 VA
18833 NW Jrs 14-Navy 1515 29-15 66% 14 WA
18834 479 Select 14 479 Select 1515 28-20 58% 14
18835 Laredo Infinity 11-Black 1515 12-9 57% 11 TX
18836 Millennium 11-Wentworth 1515 15-14 52% 11 OH
18837 EU 13-Platinum 1515 21-13 62% 13 IN
18838 kKrushers 12-1 1515 2-1 40% 12 PA
18839 Elite Alliance 14-Le 1515 3-2 60% 14 SD
18840 HPRIME 16-Adidas 1515 26-22 52% 16 TX
18841 Iowa Vortex 16-Lexy 1515 9-8 53% 16 IA
18842 ZUMAZ 16-2 1515 9-9 47% 16 MN
18843 NSVBC 16-Select white 1515 24-20 55% 16 WI
18844 Lions Starved Rock 13-Ruby 1515 11-5 69% 13 IL
18845 MAC 16-1 elite 1515 23-31 43% 16 OR
18846 TX Infinity 15-S red 1515 10-10 50% 15 TX
18847 Rise Elite VC 14-Tabari 1515 18-11 62% 14 FL
18848 Lineshot 14-Pink american 1515 6-5 55% 14 OH
18849 SoDak Juniors 17-1 national 1515 7-4 64% 17 MN
18850 LI Surge Volleyball Club 13-Premier blue 1515 3-2 60% 13 NY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.