Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 376 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18751 Pipestone Area 13-Green 1516 2-1 50% 13 MN
18752 Instinct VBC 15-Wild black 1516 5-3 63% 15 MN
18753 FMTVA 17-Purple 1516 29-27 52% 17 TX
18754 Renegades 12 Adidas 1516 21-14 57% 12 TX
18755 LC Rise 14 1516 8-6 57% 14 KY
18756 Lakas 15-Elite 1516 26-23 53% 15 CA
18757 Stormbreaker 11-Valkyrie 1516 23-26 47% 11 CA
18758 De Pere Diggers 16-S 1516 6-7 46% 16 WI
18759 Tulsa Power 16-2 1516 23-25 48% 16 OK
18760 Net Force 15-1 elite 1516 11-15 41% 15 IA
18761 Nona Volleyball Academy 14 14 RICARDO (FL) 1516 6-6 50% 14 FL
18762 North Star 12-Tlb elite 1516 3-2 50% 12 MN
18763 Watertown JO 16-S 1516 2-1 67% 16 MN
18764 UPONTOP 13-Local 1516 8-5 62% 13 FL
18765 NEVA 10-2 1516 6-4 60% 10 PR
18766 Hunters Creek Volleyball Academy 12 12 Windermere 1516 27-16 63% 12 FL
18767 FSJ 14-4 regional 1516 16-9 64% 14 AR
18768 TAV South 14-White 1516 25-21 49% 14 TX
18769 Zona 17-R1 1516 12-8 60% 17 AZ
18770 GVC 16-1elizabeth 1516 8-9 44% 16 AL
18771 SC Midlands 12 Perform 1516 20-18 53% 12 SC
18772 MOCO Volleyball Club LLC 16 MOCO (MD) Madness 1516 3-2 60% 16 MD
18773 NW Elite 16-6 green 1516 28-17 62% 16 OR
18774 BVA 14 R 1516 18-11 62% 14 NC
18775 TeamLVC 15-White 1516 30-19 61% 15 NY
18776 KC Force 15-1 1516 12-9 50% 15 MO
18777 Legend 12 1516 18-26 41% 12 CA
18778 FW Fire 15-1 white 1516 11-9 52% 15 TX
18779 SVA 13-Aki 1516 15-15 50% 13 WA
18780 Raleigh 17 Royal 1516 23-25 48% 17 NC
18781 Chicago Elite 12-Watermelon 1516 9-7 56% 12 IL
18782 MEVC 16-Blue 1516 19-17 50% 16 SC
18783 Lady Spartans 14 1516 6-4 60% 14 NC
18784 RVC 16-Allen 1516 3-4 43% 16 WA
18785 PSVA Branford 16-Black 1516 16-9 64% 16 FL
18786 MiElite 17-Ns north 1516 19-18 51% 17 MI
18787 Cornerstone Volleyball Club 14-Brad 1516 10-8 48% 14
18788 AJV 12 Navy 1516 19-21 48% 12 TX
18789 DCVB Purple 12-2 1516 5-5 50% 12 NC
18790 Sky High Adidas 13-Gray 1516 17-18 49% 13 IL
18791 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 13 Trina B 1516 2-1 50% 13 UT
18792 CWAVE Fralick- Swarm 12 1516 4-1 80% 12 OH
18793 Iowa Elite 16-Royal 1516 10-8 53% 16 IA
18794 Monon 13-4r ravens 1516 26-19 58% 13 IN
18795 TriState Crusaders 12-2 1516 3-2 60% 12 NE
18796 APVA 13-Kayce 1516 20-15 57% 13 TN
18797 MT NW 16-2 nora 1516 20-15 47% 16 MT
18798 NVA 13-Black 1516 14-26 35% 13 PA
18799 Zoom 13-1 michelle 1516 13-6 68% 13 KS
18800 West Coast 16-Laura 1516 3-3 50% 16 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.