Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 366 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18251 Hammerhead 14-2 1522 14-11 56% 14 MN
18252 ICE 14-Regional c 1522 3-1 75% 14 WA
18253 SCENIC CITY 15-Semi nat 1522 19-17 53% 15 TN
18254 Chicago Elite 12 National 1522 17-14 55% 12 IL
18255 South Central NE 13-Red 1522 2-4 33% 13 NE
18256 DBQ Insanity 17-2 black 1522 2-1 50% 17 IA
18257 SOSVBC 18-N elvis 1522 2-5 29% 18 NY
18258 NLVA 14-1 gold 1522 25-24 51% 14 NC
18259 So. PHX Rebels 15-S 1522 33-27 55% 15 AZ
18260 Eclipse Volleyball Club 14 EVC Sigler (OV) 1522 12-8 60% 14
18261 Team Ok 12-Black 1522 22-19 51% 12 OK
18262 753 Vollyeball 17 753 Volleyball 1521 5-4 56% 17
18263 Cut Shot VBC 16-1 1521 8-6 57% 16 CA
18264 Heat Volleyball Club-Fox Valley 16-Red 1521 13-10 57% 16 WI
18265 CVVC 12-2 1521 21-12 51% 12 MT
18266 Ducks Volleyball Club 14-3 amanda 1521 4-3 57% 14
18267 407 16-White 1521 43-31 58% 16 FL
18268 UP North Jr's DSN 16-Navy 1521 6-3 67% 16 WI
18269 Ace 16-Kate 1521 4-4 50% 16 AZ
18270 Westview 13-Rahn 1521 2-1 67% 13 IN
18271 Club G1 17 Club G1 Red 1521 4-1 80% 17 AR
18272 Emerald Rain 15-Elite 1521 30-31 49% 15 WA
18273 M2 Volleyball 13-N1 1521 33-19 63% 13 GA
18274 Legacy Elite VBA 16-N 1521 23-11 68% 16 OH
18275 London Elite 13-American 1521 9-10 47% 13 OH
18276 Champions 12-Short season 1521 6-5 50% 12 AL
18277 Iowa Vibe 11-Pulse 1521 6-5 55% 11 IA
18278 Club Khaos 12U 1521 7-5 58% 12 PA
18279 Empire 14-2 1521 3-1 75% 14 KS
18280 Vibe 16-Gold 1521 18-11 53% 16 VT
18281 InnovativeVC 16-1robert 1521 19-10 66% 16 PR
18282 Air VBC 14-White 1521 10-9 53% 14 WI
18283 MOVA 12-M 1521 8-7 53% 12 OH
18284 CPVB 17-National 1521 15-17 47% 17 CT
18285 SCVBC 14-Semi-national 1521 7-4 64% 14 TN
18286 Club Sol 13-Pink 1521 13-15 38% 13 UT
18287 GCVC 12-Blue 1521 12-13 48% 12 OH
18288 Synergy 16-Nova 1521 22-23 48% 16 PA
18289 TPV 14-Yankee 1521 35-32 52% 14 TN
18290 LCVC 14-Green (NO) 1521 5-4 50% 14 MN
18291 VORTEX VBC 15-1 amy 1521 3-4 43% 15 UT
18292 540 VB 15 National 1521 31-35 47% 15 VA
18293 EMV 13-Royal holly 1521 20-13 51% 13 TX
18294 360 Volleyball Club 14 14 Kaos Red 1521 3-4 43% 14 TX
18295 NVA 14-Elite ricardo 1521 25-19 57% 14 FL
18296 TriCounty ATTACK 15-1 1521 14-13 52% 15 NJ
18297 PSVBA 16-Elite 2 1521 13-10 57% 16 WA
18298 South Central NE 14-Silve 1521 5-4 50% 14 NE
18299 ROCK Volleyball 16-Sun 1521 24-23 51% 16 PA
18300 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-3f 1521 10-10 50% 16 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.