2025-2026 Season — Page 366 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18251 | Hammerhead 14-2 | 1522 | 14-11 | 56% | 14 | MN |
| 18252 | ICE 14-Regional c | 1522 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | WA |
| 18253 | SCENIC CITY 15-Semi nat | 1522 | 19-17 | 53% | 15 | TN |
| 18254 | Chicago Elite 12 National | 1522 | 17-14 | 55% | 12 | IL |
| 18255 | South Central NE 13-Red | 1522 | 2-4 | 33% | 13 | NE |
| 18256 | DBQ Insanity 17-2 black | 1522 | 2-1 | 50% | 17 | IA |
| 18257 | SOSVBC 18-N elvis | 1522 | 2-5 | 29% | 18 | NY |
| 18258 | NLVA 14-1 gold | 1522 | 25-24 | 51% | 14 | NC |
| 18259 | So. PHX Rebels 15-S | 1522 | 33-27 | 55% | 15 | AZ |
| 18260 | Eclipse Volleyball Club 14 EVC Sigler (OV) | 1522 | 12-8 | 60% | 14 | |
| 18261 | Team Ok 12-Black | 1522 | 22-19 | 51% | 12 | OK |
| 18262 | 753 Vollyeball 17 753 Volleyball | 1521 | 5-4 | 56% | 17 | |
| 18263 | Cut Shot VBC 16-1 | 1521 | 8-6 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 18264 | Heat Volleyball Club-Fox Valley 16-Red | 1521 | 13-10 | 57% | 16 | WI |
| 18265 | CVVC 12-2 | 1521 | 21-12 | 51% | 12 | MT |
| 18266 | Ducks Volleyball Club 14-3 amanda | 1521 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | |
| 18267 | 407 16-White | 1521 | 43-31 | 58% | 16 | FL |
| 18268 | UP North Jr's DSN 16-Navy | 1521 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | WI |
| 18269 | Ace 16-Kate | 1521 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | AZ |
| 18270 | Westview 13-Rahn | 1521 | 2-1 | 67% | 13 | IN |
| 18271 | Club G1 17 Club G1 Red | 1521 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | AR |
| 18272 | Emerald Rain 15-Elite | 1521 | 30-31 | 49% | 15 | WA |
| 18273 | M2 Volleyball 13-N1 | 1521 | 33-19 | 63% | 13 | GA |
| 18274 | Legacy Elite VBA 16-N | 1521 | 23-11 | 68% | 16 | OH |
| 18275 | London Elite 13-American | 1521 | 9-10 | 47% | 13 | OH |
| 18276 | Champions 12-Short season | 1521 | 6-5 | 50% | 12 | AL |
| 18277 | Iowa Vibe 11-Pulse | 1521 | 6-5 | 55% | 11 | IA |
| 18278 | Club Khaos 12U | 1521 | 7-5 | 58% | 12 | PA |
| 18279 | Empire 14-2 | 1521 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | KS |
| 18280 | Vibe 16-Gold | 1521 | 18-11 | 53% | 16 | VT |
| 18281 | InnovativeVC 16-1robert | 1521 | 19-10 | 66% | 16 | PR |
| 18282 | Air VBC 14-White | 1521 | 10-9 | 53% | 14 | WI |
| 18283 | MOVA 12-M | 1521 | 8-7 | 53% | 12 | OH |
| 18284 | CPVB 17-National | 1521 | 15-17 | 47% | 17 | CT |
| 18285 | SCVBC 14-Semi-national | 1521 | 7-4 | 64% | 14 | TN |
| 18286 | Club Sol 13-Pink | 1521 | 13-15 | 38% | 13 | UT |
| 18287 | GCVC 12-Blue | 1521 | 12-13 | 48% | 12 | OH |
| 18288 | Synergy 16-Nova | 1521 | 22-23 | 48% | 16 | PA |
| 18289 | TPV 14-Yankee | 1521 | 35-32 | 52% | 14 | TN |
| 18290 | LCVC 14-Green (NO) | 1521 | 5-4 | 50% | 14 | MN |
| 18291 | VORTEX VBC 15-1 amy | 1521 | 3-4 | 43% | 15 | UT |
| 18292 | 540 VB 15 National | 1521 | 31-35 | 47% | 15 | VA |
| 18293 | EMV 13-Royal holly | 1521 | 20-13 | 51% | 13 | TX |
| 18294 | 360 Volleyball Club 14 14 Kaos Red | 1521 | 3-4 | 43% | 14 | TX |
| 18295 | NVA 14-Elite ricardo | 1521 | 25-19 | 57% | 14 | FL |
| 18296 | TriCounty ATTACK 15-1 | 1521 | 14-13 | 52% | 15 | NJ |
| 18297 | PSVBA 16-Elite 2 | 1521 | 13-10 | 57% | 16 | WA |
| 18298 | South Central NE 14-Silve | 1521 | 5-4 | 50% | 14 | NE |
| 18299 | ROCK Volleyball 16-Sun | 1521 | 24-23 | 51% | 16 | PA |
| 18300 | BORINQUEN COQUI 16-3f | 1521 | 10-10 | 50% | 16 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.