Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 367 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18301 South Central NE 14-Silve 1521 5-4 50% 14 NE
18302 ROCK Volleyball 16-Sun 1521 24-23 51% 16 PA
18303 BORINQUEN COQUI 16-3f 1521 10-10 50% 16 PR
18304 Blocksport 16-R 1521 5-3 56% 16 TX
18305 GVC 14-Barthelus 1521 25-15 63% 14 FL
18306 Legacy 14-Elite east 1521 29-18 62% 14 MI
18307 ME VA 16-Orange 1521 23-19 55% 16 TX
18308 HP 17-3 1521 28-34 45% 17 MI
18309 Ducks Volleyball Club 14-3 amanda 1521 4-3 57% 14
18310 HJV 14-Adidas 1521 12-11 52% 14 TX
18311 Mac Attack 14 1521 13-7 65% 14 IA
18312 CLASH 17-26 1521 5-2 71% 17 MA
18313 Arch City 15 1521 27-20 57% 15 MO
18314 WAVE ALLIANCE 14 PRO 1521 36-20 64% 14 FL
18315 OK.OK Charge 13-11 13 stillwa 1521 7-1 70% 13 OK
18316 Silverton Bearcats 12-1 1521 16-11 59% 12 OR
18317 405 Drive 12-1 1521 10-4 71% 12 OK
18318 GVG14 10 1521 2-4 33% 10 PR
18319 MOD Regional 12-White 1521 8-5 62% 12 IL
18320 Panther 15-1 1521 4-3 57% 15 CO
18321 Liberty All-Stars 14 1521 3-3 38% 14 IA
18322 Boss CLE Athletic Company 16-3 elite 1521 6-2 75% 16 OH
18323 LIV 16-Royal susie 1521 13-18 42% 16 CA
18324 Stingray 17-Black 1521 8-12 40% 17 CA
18325 Prime 16 Molten 1521 24-20 55% 16 CA
18326 RAGE 16 1521 8-6 57% 16 WI
18327 ACCV 13-Black travel 1521 7-3 64% 13 TX
18328 Boise Ignite 16 National 1521 11-25 31% 16 UT
18329 NPJ Salem 17 Premier 1521 21-31 40% 17 OR
18330 TNT 13-Coyote 1521 22-18 54% 13 PA
18331 Renegades 17 Adidas 1521 26-29 46% 17 TX
18332 PEPVB 18-Purple 1521 20-23 47% 18 GA
18333 Idaho ONE 15-Pink 1521 24-26 48% 15 ID
18334 NNJ 14-Amanda 1521 20-24 45% 14 NV
18335 Tamales 16-1 1521 9-9 50% 16 MO
18336 AJAXVB 15-1 gold 1521 5-4 56% 15 OR
18337 IGNITE 18-BLACK 1521 26-21 55% 18 OH
18338 TN Heat 12-S 1521 7-7 39% 12 TN
18339 Club Net 13 National 1521 23-20 53% 13 AR
18340 Momentum 12-Gold 1521 27-30 47% 12 FL
18341 501 Volley 14-2 national 1521 24-31 44% 14 AR
18342 Club Fusion 15-2 national 1521 28-33 46% 15 IL
18343 FBK 18-Black 1521 29-49 37% 18 AZ
18344 AEV 10 National 1521 11-12 48% 10 TX
18345 Lakes Elite 13-1 1521 4-4 50% 13 MN
18346 Velocity Volleyball Club 14 1521 8-8 50% 14 AR
18347 ARIZONA STORM 10-Thunder 1521 7-5 58% 10 AZ
18348 EPVC 13-3 1521 2-2 50% 13 OH
18349 CVVC 12-2 1521 21-12 51% 12 MT
18350 Tillamook Volleyball Club 12-1 1521 10-10 50% 12 OR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.