Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 365 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
18201 NO LIMITZ 15 15U Teal No Limitz Volleyball (FL) (4) 1522 7-7 50% 15 FL
18202 Capitanas 11-Christian 1522 4-2 67% 11 PR
18203 Mass Premier 14-1 blue 1522 19-21 48% 14 MA
18204 FIVA 18-Rene 1522 20-23 47% 18 FL
18205 Top Flight 13-Gamma 1522 7-4 64% 13 IL
18206 Novus 16-Purple 1522 7-3 70% 16 IL
18207 Cadence 15 1522 3-2 60% 15 OH
18208 Chattanooga 13-Jennifer 1522 5-5 50% 13 GA
18209 Gardiner 16-2 1522 8-10 33% 16 MT
18210 Mass Pats 15-3 teamwork 1522 8-6 47% 15 MA
18211 WPVC 17-Armour silver 1522 39-31 56% 17 FL
18212 LC Spark 12 LC Spark Boom (SU) 1522 9-7 56% 12 NM
18213 Boston United 18-Royal 1522 3-0 100% 18 MA
18214 Coqui Coast 14 1522 12-9 57% 14 AL
18215 PVA 16-Nike 1522 14-16 47% 16 MO
18216 Maui Encore 14-S 1522 7-9 44% 14 HI
18217 314 VBC 12-Navy 1522 25-18 58% 12 MO
18218 805 Elite 14-West coast talie 1522 4-3 57% 14 CA
18219 WGVBA 17-Elite 1522 16-11 57% 17 TX
18220 Panhandle Powerhouse 13 1522 8-3 62% 13 NE
18221 San Diego VBC 16-James 1522 22-29 43% 16 CA
18222 CLVC 15-Black 1522 18-21 46% 15 NC
18223 O2VBC 15-Green 1522 18-12 60% 15 NY
18224 Team Ok 12-Black 1522 22-19 51% 12 OK
18225 Fusion 15-Diamond 1522 13-6 62% 15 VT
18226 BVA FC 16-Royal haley 1522 14-10 58% 16 KY
18227 SVBC 16-Teal 1522 9-8 45% 16 IA
18228 Piopio Bears 12-S 1522 3-2 60% 12 HI
18229 Vortex 15-Michele 1522 17-11 50% 15 UT
18230 GSA 16-Lauren 1522 11-15 42% 16 CA
18231 Delta Patriots 15 1522 11-6 65% 15 AR
18232 Lansing 14-2 1522 4-2 67% 14 NY
18233 SVC 12U Purple 1522 10-12 45% 12 IN
18234 MAVERICKS 16-Premier 1522 10-10 50% 16 LA
18235 Capital Ice 18 1522 24-16 60% 18 WA
18236 Iowa Elite 17-Mustangs 1522 3-2 60% 17 IA
18237 FURY Volleyball 17-Jackie 1522 10-7 59% 17 NY
18238 JET 14 VILLARREAL 1522 10-13 43% 14 TX
18239 Adrenaline 17-Alix 1522 3-2 60% 17 IA
18240 Hammerhead 14-2 1522 14-11 56% 14 MN
18241 ICE 14-Regional c 1522 3-1 75% 14 WA
18242 SCENIC CITY 15-Semi nat 1522 19-17 53% 15 TN
18243 Chicago Elite 12 National 1522 17-14 55% 12 IL
18244 South Central NE 13-Red 1522 2-4 33% 13 NE
18245 DBQ Insanity 17-2 black 1522 2-1 50% 17 IA
18246 SOSVBC 18-N elvis 1522 2-5 29% 18 NY
18247 So. PHX Rebels 15-S 1522 33-27 55% 15 AZ
18248 Eclipse Volleyball Club 14 EVC Sigler (OV) 1522 12-8 60% 14
18249 I3V 13-1 1522 15-12 56% 13 NM
18250 SASVBC G 13 HONU 1522 24-23 51% 13 HI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.