2025-2026 Season — Page 332 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16551 | WVBA 14 Regional | 1539 | 23-32 | 42% | 14 | WA |
| 16552 | Buckeye 16-Red national | 1539 | 24-38 | 39% | 16 | OH |
| 16553 | 575 14-Lpnb cat | 1539 | 37-26 | 59% | 14 | GA |
| 16554 | London Elite 14-American | 1539 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | OH |
| 16555 | High Line 15-Aspiring pnk | 1539 | 23-19 | 47% | 15 | PA |
| 16556 | Royal Legends 15-Blue | 1539 | 26-31 | 46% | 15 | PA |
| 16557 | NPJO Volleyball 14-Black | 1539 | 8-9 | 47% | 14 | MN |
| 16558 | Ozark Juniors 16-National | 1539 | 23-22 | 50% | 16 | AR |
| 16559 | Texas United 11-Red | 1539 | 10-8 | 53% | 11 | TX |
| 16560 | VOLT 12-Black | 1539 | 34-29 | 52% | 12 | ND |
| 16561 | KODA 15 West | 1539 | 18-12 | 53% | 15 | NY |
| 16562 | Bama Elite 16-N pirates | 1539 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | AL |
| 16563 | Chicago Elite 18 Elite | 1539 | 18-15 | 55% | 18 | IL |
| 16564 | Boston United 13-National | 1539 | 36-28 | 56% | 13 | MA |
| 16565 | Centennial Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1539 | 31-31 | 50% | 14 | MN |
| 16566 | SPIRIT VBC 16-3 | 1539 | 23-17 | 57% | 16 | OH |
| 16567 | HCS 15-Mamba black | 1539 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | NV |
| 16568 | NORTH VOLLEYBALL PUERTO RICO 18 NVPU-18U-JOSSY | 1539 | 4-3 | 57% | 18 | PR |
| 16569 | Cougar Volleyball Club 14-Ugjames | 1539 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | IA |
| 16570 | LES 14 Jason | 1539 | 14-8 | 56% | 14 | AL |
| 16571 | Vibe 13-Tanner | 1539 | 20-22 | 48% | 13 | CA |
| 16572 | FTL 14-Fusion kayla | 1539 | 24-29 | 45% | 14 | FL |
| 16573 | Club One AZ 14-Gold | 1539 | 30-33 | 48% | 14 | AZ |
| 16574 | Top Caliber 14 Bri | 1539 | 24-17 | 59% | 14 | NC |
| 16575 | CCJ 18-1 (CE) | 1539 | 18-13 | 58% | 18 | OR |
| 16576 | GSL JO VB 12-1 | 1539 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | MN |
| 16577 | Central California Volleyball Academy 15-Power | 1539 | 11-6 | 65% | 15 | CA |
| 16578 | Ballistic 14 | 1539 | 20-10 | 67% | 14 | MI |
| 16579 | Oklahoma Blaze 13-S | 1539 | 13-12 | 52% | 13 | OK |
| 16580 | Chaska Juniors 15-1 | 1539 | 20-28 | 42% | 15 | MN |
| 16581 | RIVAL 14-1 | 1539 | 6-7 | 46% | 14 | FL |
| 16582 | VEVA Force 13-Blue | 1539 | 69-87 | 44% | 13 | PA |
| 16583 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1539 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | KS |
| 16584 | SECC Rebels VBA 11-1 | 1539 | 3-2 | 60% | 11 | AB |
| 16585 | Greenway 12 | 1539 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | MN |
| 16586 | Vibe 13-Kinsley | 1539 | 13-7 | 65% | 13 | GA |
| 16587 | Orion Chargers 11-Red | 1539 | 6-2 | 67% | 11 | IA |
| 16588 | SVVC 14 | 1539 | 9-5 | 64% | 14 | KY |
| 16589 | AVA 14-Premier 3 | 1539 | 24-12 | 67% | 14 | NY |
| 16590 | Four1Nine Xtreme 14 14-Sager (OV) | 1539 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | OH |
| 16591 | SA Force 13 National | 1539 | 22-20 | 52% | 13 | TX |
| 16592 | NSVBC 15-Select white | 1539 | 15-8 | 63% | 15 | WI |
| 16593 | ESVBC 16-Avalanche local | 1539 | 14-9 | 61% | 16 | IA |
| 16594 | adidas DYNASTY 15-5 | 1539 | 11-2 | 69% | 15 | KS |
| 16595 | Digs 13-Red | 1539 | 13-21 | 38% | 13 | NJ |
| 16596 | Invicta 13-Kendzee/gracie | 1539 | 28-21 | 52% | 13 | UT |
| 16597 | North Point 16-Kinleigh | 1539 | 3-1 | 60% | 16 | TX |
| 16598 | 606 United VBC 14 UNITED IGNITE (PR) | 1539 | 12-6 | 67% | 14 | KY |
| 16599 | Chadron Elite 13 | 1539 | 12-8 | 60% | 13 | NE |
| 16600 | Gurabo Volley 12 | 1539 | 5-2 | 71% | 12 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.