2025-2026 Season — Page 331 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16501 | DVC 15-Gray | 1540 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 16502 | Tstreet SN 14-Angela | 1540 | 14-16 | 47% | 14 | NV |
| 16503 | NIVA 12-Green | 1540 | 16-10 | 62% | 12 | IN |
| 16504 | Katy United 16 Fathom | 1540 | 29-20 | 58% | 16 | TX |
| 16505 | NEPA ELITE 14-Blizzard | 1540 | 28-20 | 55% | 14 | PA |
| 16506 | Illini Elite 13-Zambi | 1540 | 9-7 | 56% | 13 | IL |
| 16507 | PJVC 10-Black | 1540 | 2-0 | 67% | 10 | TX |
| 16508 | MOJO Volleyball Academy 12-Black | 1540 | 8-8 | 50% | 12 | MD |
| 16509 | True to Form Athletics 15 TTF FLIGHT | 1540 | 18-15 | 53% | 15 | NY |
| 16510 | SVC Girls 14-1 | 1540 | 42-39 | 52% | 14 | NY |
| 16511 | Titan Select 18-Matt | 1540 | 19-15 | 56% | 18 | CA |
| 16512 | PAO STL 14-Rda black | 1540 | 47-32 | 59% | 14 | MO |
| 16513 | Platform 13-Molten | 1540 | 28-19 | 58% | 13 | IA |
| 16514 | Rise Elite VC 14-Ashley | 1540 | 19-12 | 61% | 14 | FL |
| 16515 | Vibe 12-2 | 1540 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | CA |
| 16516 | CinciVB Acad 13-5 | 1540 | 7-4 | 64% | 13 | OH |
| 16517 | Cloud Peak 12-Caitlyn | 1540 | 13-8 | 62% | 12 | WY |
| 16518 | SDVBC 15-Teun | 1540 | 33-12 | 73% | 15 | CA |
| 16519 | Boltz 15-Beast mode | 1540 | 28-32 | 47% | 15 | AZ |
| 16520 | Pure Passion 18-1 | 1540 | 27-18 | 60% | 18 | CT |
| 16521 | LOSO 14-1 mia | 1540 | 5-1 | 83% | 14 | OH |
| 16522 | Freedom G13-1 | 1540 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | MO |
| 16523 | TC ELITE 14-L | 1540 | 10-5 | 59% | 14 | LA |
| 16524 | PREVAIL Girls 14-Platinum | 1540 | 11-9 | 55% | 14 | PA |
| 16525 | Northern Tier 18U Select | 1540 | 20-9 | 63% | 18 | PA |
| 16526 | CVA 13-Black | 1540 | 26-37 | 41% | 13 | CO |
| 16527 | SF Juniors 18-Black | 1540 | 12-9 | 57% | 18 | CA |
| 16528 | Alpha Omega Volleyball 12-1 | 1540 | 12-2 | 71% | 12 | MO |
| 16529 | GRV 15-Red | 1540 | 21-22 | 49% | 15 | IN |
| 16530 | Illini Elite 16-L red | 1540 | 17-15 | 53% | 16 | IL |
| 16531 | Rage 16-1 | 1540 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | CA |
| 16532 | VCN 12-Blue | 1540 | 4-4 | 50% | 12 | NE |
| 16533 | Beach Cities 12-Smack | 1540 | 28-26 | 52% | 12 | CA |
| 16534 | JCHB 14-1 | 1540 | 15-8 | 65% | 14 | NY |
| 16535 | Synergy 14-Tornado | 1540 | 29-26 | 53% | 14 | PA |
| 16536 | Club UV 18 | 1540 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | UT |
| 16537 | CHiX 16-White | 1540 | 10-9 | 53% | 16 | OH |
| 16538 | G3VB 17-1 | 1540 | 21-30 | 41% | 17 | OR |
| 16539 | Kajun Heat 13 | 1540 | 17-11 | 61% | 13 | |
| 16540 | Vibe 13-Tanner | 1539 | 20-22 | 48% | 13 | CA |
| 16541 | Centennial Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1539 | 31-31 | 50% | 14 | MN |
| 16542 | Desert Elite 15 | 1539 | 22-22 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 16543 | NJ RONIN 14 KATANA | 1539 | 24-21 | 53% | 14 | NJ |
| 16544 | High Line 15-Aspiring pnk | 1539 | 23-19 | 47% | 15 | PA |
| 16545 | Texas United 11-Red | 1539 | 10-8 | 53% | 11 | TX |
| 16546 | VOLT 12-Black | 1539 | 34-29 | 52% | 12 | ND |
| 16547 | TAMPA UNITED VBA 17-Red | 1539 | 41-28 | 59% | 17 | FL |
| 16548 | Cougar Volleyball Club 14-Ugjames | 1539 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | IA |
| 16549 | LES 14 Jason | 1539 | 14-8 | 56% | 14 | AL |
| 16550 | Boston United 13-National | 1539 | 36-28 | 56% | 13 | MA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.