2025-2026 Season — Page 333 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16601 | Chaska Juniors 15-1 | 1539 | 20-28 | 42% | 15 | MN |
| 16602 | RIVAL 14-1 | 1539 | 6-7 | 46% | 14 | FL |
| 16603 | Ks Networks Volleyball Club 14-1 | 1539 | 2-4 | 33% | 14 | KS |
| 16604 | Greenway 12 | 1539 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | MN |
| 16605 | Jr. Sea-Hawks 14-Red | 1539 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | |
| 16606 | SA Force 13 National | 1539 | 22-20 | 52% | 13 | TX |
| 16607 | adidas DYNASTY 15-5 | 1539 | 11-2 | 69% | 15 | KS |
| 16608 | Digs 13-Red | 1539 | 13-21 | 38% | 13 | NJ |
| 16609 | Invicta 13-Kendzee/gracie | 1539 | 28-21 | 52% | 13 | UT |
| 16610 | Gurabo Volley 12 | 1539 | 5-2 | 71% | 12 | PR |
| 16611 | CID 16-Black | 1539 | 12-11 | 52% | 16 | ID |
| 16612 | NW Elite 16-1 gold | 1539 | 15-18 | 45% | 16 | OR |
| 16613 | Cape Cod 16-Dru | 1539 | 10-8 | 42% | 16 | MA |
| 16614 | Oklahoma Blaze 15-S | 1539 | 12-7 | 63% | 15 | OK |
| 16615 | Vertex 15-S | 1539 | 5-3 | 56% | 15 | TX |
| 16616 | Warriors 10 | 1539 | 7-6 | 54% | 10 | FL |
| 16617 | OCJ 18-Maroon | 1539 | 19-8 | 68% | 18 | OR |
| 16618 | UPONTOP 12-1 | 1539 | 7-7 | 50% | 12 | FL |
| 16619 | SVC 18 Gold | 1539 | 11-9 | 55% | 18 | IA |
| 16620 | TX Ultimate 12-Blue | 1539 | 4-3 | 44% | 12 | TX |
| 16621 | VCNebraska 11-Elite | 1539 | 5-4 | 56% | 11 | NE |
| 16622 | Rhythm 14 Elite | 1539 | 24-19 | 53% | 14 | TN |
| 16623 | HEAT 13-Elite (OK) | 1539 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | OK |
| 16624 | RVC Sparks 17 | 1539 | 59-65 | 46% | 17 | TX |
| 16625 | Central Mass Juniors 15-Elite | 1539 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | MA |
| 16626 | Chi City 13-3 regional | 1539 | 18-8 | 67% | 13 | IL |
| 16627 | LAVA West 12-White | 1539 | 8-4 | 67% | 12 | CA |
| 16628 | SVA 14-S black | 1539 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | MN |
| 16629 | River City Jrs 13 Navy | 1539 | 25-17 | 60% | 13 | IA |
| 16630 | KIVA 14 Silver | 1539 | 36-35 | 51% | 14 | KY |
| 16631 | NM HEAT 15-1 | 1539 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | MI |
| 16632 | CCVB 15-2 | 1539 | 1-3 | 25% | 15 | GA |
| 16633 | PointBreakVBC 15-2 loren | 1539 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | HI |
| 16634 | Coalition 17-1 | 1539 | 25-20 | 56% | 17 | CO |
| 16635 | Santa Fe Storm 15-3 liz | 1538 | 2-2 | 25% | 15 | CO |
| 16636 | MVC 15 Vicki | 1538 | 31-26 | 54% | 15 | OH |
| 16637 | Performance 12-1 | 1538 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | |
| 16638 | Sanford Fargo 15-Black | 1538 | 17-21 | 45% | 15 | MN |
| 16639 | Anamosa 14 | 1538 | 6-4 | 43% | 14 | IA |
| 16640 | ATOWN 14-1b | 1538 | 25-14 | 64% | 14 | SC |
| 16641 | CFV 16-S | 1538 | 10-5 | 67% | 16 | WI |
| 16642 | KIVA 16 KIVA 67 Grey | 1538 | 3-4 | 43% | 16 | KY |
| 16643 | UVAC Urban Volleyball 16-Andrew | 1538 | 26-14 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 16644 | Watertown JO 16 | 1538 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | MN |
| 16645 | Rice City 15-Red | 1538 | 8-3 | 73% | 15 | LA |
| 16646 | Wave 13-1 | 1538 | 5-2 | 71% | 13 | CA |
| 16647 | Phoenix Fire 18 | 1538 | 7-2 | 70% | 18 | NY |
| 16648 | Whirlwind VBC 17-2 | 1538 | 17-9 | 65% | 17 | NY |
| 16649 | Mountain View Volleyball Club 12 MVVC Youth G 6- Jimmy | 1538 | 5-3 | 63% | 12 | CA |
| 16650 | Lions 12-Blue | 1538 | 23-22 | 51% | 12 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.