Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 333 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16601 Chaska Juniors 15-1 1539 20-28 42% 15 MN
16602 RIVAL 14-1 1539 6-7 46% 14 FL
16603 Ks Networks Volleyball Club 14-1 1539 2-4 33% 14 KS
16604 Greenway 12 1539 6-3 67% 12 MN
16605 Jr. Sea-Hawks 14-Red 1539 4-3 57% 14
16606 SA Force 13 National 1539 22-20 52% 13 TX
16607 adidas DYNASTY 15-5 1539 11-2 69% 15 KS
16608 Digs 13-Red 1539 13-21 38% 13 NJ
16609 Invicta 13-Kendzee/gracie 1539 28-21 52% 13 UT
16610 Gurabo Volley 12 1539 5-2 71% 12 PR
16611 CID 16-Black 1539 12-11 52% 16 ID
16612 NW Elite 16-1 gold 1539 15-18 45% 16 OR
16613 Cape Cod 16-Dru 1539 10-8 42% 16 MA
16614 Oklahoma Blaze 15-S 1539 12-7 63% 15 OK
16615 Vertex 15-S 1539 5-3 56% 15 TX
16616 Warriors 10 1539 7-6 54% 10 FL
16617 OCJ 18-Maroon 1539 19-8 68% 18 OR
16618 UPONTOP 12-1 1539 7-7 50% 12 FL
16619 SVC 18 Gold 1539 11-9 55% 18 IA
16620 TX Ultimate 12-Blue 1539 4-3 44% 12 TX
16621 VCNebraska 11-Elite 1539 5-4 56% 11 NE
16622 Rhythm 14 Elite 1539 24-19 53% 14 TN
16623 HEAT 13-Elite (OK) 1539 5-1 83% 13 OK
16624 RVC Sparks 17 1539 59-65 46% 17 TX
16625 Central Mass Juniors 15-Elite 1539 5-3 63% 15 MA
16626 Chi City 13-3 regional 1539 18-8 67% 13 IL
16627 LAVA West 12-White 1539 8-4 67% 12 CA
16628 SVA 14-S black 1539 3-1 75% 14 MN
16629 River City Jrs 13 Navy 1539 25-17 60% 13 IA
16630 KIVA 14 Silver 1539 36-35 51% 14 KY
16631 NM HEAT 15-1 1539 3-2 60% 15 MI
16632 CCVB 15-2 1539 1-3 25% 15 GA
16633 PointBreakVBC 15-2 loren 1539 5-3 63% 15 HI
16634 Coalition 17-1 1539 25-20 56% 17 CO
16635 Santa Fe Storm 15-3 liz 1538 2-2 25% 15 CO
16636 MVC 15 Vicki 1538 31-26 54% 15 OH
16637 Performance 12-1 1538 3-1 75% 12
16638 Sanford Fargo 15-Black 1538 17-21 45% 15 MN
16639 Anamosa 14 1538 6-4 43% 14 IA
16640 ATOWN 14-1b 1538 25-14 64% 14 SC
16641 CFV 16-S 1538 10-5 67% 16 WI
16642 KIVA 16 KIVA 67 Grey 1538 3-4 43% 16 KY
16643 UVAC Urban Volleyball 16-Andrew 1538 26-14 65% 16 CA
16644 Watertown JO 16 1538 7-2 78% 16 MN
16645 Rice City 15-Red 1538 8-3 73% 15 LA
16646 Wave 13-1 1538 5-2 71% 13 CA
16647 Phoenix Fire 18 1538 7-2 70% 18 NY
16648 Whirlwind VBC 17-2 1538 17-9 65% 17 NY
16649 Mountain View Volleyball Club 12 MVVC Youth G 6- Jimmy 1538 5-3 63% 12 CA
16650 Lions 12-Blue 1538 23-22 51% 12 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.