Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 328 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16351 Lions Starved Rock 11-Ruby 1541 12-5 71% 11 IL
16352 Texas Tornados 13-Adidas 1541 15-18 44% 13 TX
16353 Alliance 16-Premier 1541 30-31 49% 16 TN
16354 Cape Cod 18-Marylou 1541 15-4 71% 18 MA
16355 Sparc VBC 16-1 1541 16-8 64% 16 MI
16356 RISE 712 12-1 1541 14-11 56% 12 IA
16357 FaR Out 14-Garnet 1541 21-9 70% 14 MI
16358 CVIBE 14-1-ashley 1541 7-8 47% 14 NC
16359 RockwoodThunder 12-Carolina 1541 25-27 45% 12 MO
16360 Maroon Belles 14-Mindy 1541 10-4 71% 14 CO
16361 NSVA 15-1 1541 3-2 60% 15 CA
16362 KC Force 16-Teal 1541 4-3 57% 16 MO
16363 L2 Volleyball Club 13 L2 231 1541 23-14 62% 13 MI
16364 Matrix Girls 13-1 1541 4-3 57% 13 AZ
16365 Sioux City Future's 11 1541 7-3 70% 11 IA
16366 Vaqueras 11-F paloma r 1541 4-1 80% 11 PR
16367 WVBC 13-Lil giants 1541 28-18 61% 13 CA
16368 Southwest Extreme 14-1 1541 4-0 100% 14 LA
16369 Smash 14-1 1541 3-0 100% 14 MA
16370 MKE Sting 13-Silver 1541 40-42 49% 13 WI
16371 NET 13-S black 1541 1-0 100% 13 AR
16372 Cyclones 16-B 1541 66-56 54% 16 IL
16373 CENTRAL TX PERF 12-1 1541 10-6 63% 12 TX
16374 GirlieGirlie VBC 16-1 1541 8-5 62% 16 HI
16375 NWF Select 14-W&k 1541 2-5 29% 14 GA
16376 ABBA 12-1 1541 3-3 50% 12 OH
16377 Dime 13-Premier 1541 17-25 40% 13 CA
16378 Diggersz 13-Red demi 1541 11-10 41% 13 IL
16379 Sibley East 15-1 1541 4-1 80% 15 MN
16380 No Limits 16 National 1541 22-20 52% 16 WA
16381 MHAC 16 1541 4-4 50% 16 OR
16382 OC Lady Elite 16-Regional 1541 21-14 60% 16 NY
16383 SFSVC 12-1 joe 1541 18-11 62% 12 NM
16384 ID ONE 16-Black 1541 3-2 60% 16 ID
16385 FRVBC 14-White 1541 24-21 53% 14 CO
16386 Storm 12-National black 1541 8-8 50% 12 TX
16387 Shock 15-Ua spark 1541 26-21 55% 15 IL
16388 TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 15-1 1541 5-7 42% 15 TX
16389 TVS 12 Mykayla 1541 7-7 47% 12 TX
16390 Image 15-Black 1541 13-12 48% 15
16391 Colorado Elite 12-Grizzly 1541 19-22 46% 12 CO
16392 AP 15-Wilco yellow 1541 27-30 47% 15 TX
16393 NHouston Elite 10-Premier 1541 8-9 47% 10 TX
16394 OYA 14-Alpha 1541 17-11 61% 14 CA
16395 IVC 16 Nationals 1541 14-16 47% 16 AK
16396 Next 14-White 1541 12-17 41% 14 OH
16397 Amarillo Xtreme 10-Spikers 1541 10-11 48% 10 TX
16398 Kansas Volleyball Club 15-1 1541 12-14 44% 15 KS
16399 Boise Ignite 17 National 1541 13-21 38% 17 UT
16400 Cincy Ice 13-1 teal 1541 7-6 54% 13 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.