Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 329 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16401 DIVA 17-Pink 1541 23-14 62% 17 KY
16402 MOJO Volleyball Academy 13-1 1541 18-6 72% 13 KS
16403 Renaissance 18-Black (KE) 1541 18-19 49% 18 PA
16404 VIRAGO 13-Elite 1541 27-23 54% 13 OK
16405 CPAC 12-Black 1541 3-0 100% 12 SD
16406 Capitals 18-National 1541 10-6 63% 18 NJ
16407 High Voltage 14-2 1541 9-6 60% 14 MN
16408 Cincy Ice 13-1 teal 1541 7-6 54% 13 OH
16409 Katy United 15-Fathom 1541 24-18 57% 15 TX
16410 ROCK Volleyball 14-Sun 1541 28-22 56% 14 PA
16411 Club South 12-Black 1541 10-8 56% 12 WA
16412 West Edge Volleyball Club 16-Dawn 1541 42-25 63% 16 CA
16413 EVCNC 14-Blue 1541 9-6 60% 14 NC
16414 TEXAS FIERCE ELITE 15-1 1541 5-7 42% 15 TX
16415 AZ EVJ 12 Navy 1541 22-18 55% 12 AZ
16416 CUVB 14-Jadore 1541 17-9 55% 14 TX
16417 Bolts 12-P 1541 5-4 38% 12 IA
16418 Iowa United 13-2 elite 1541 28-25 52% 13 IA
16419 Matrix Girls 13-1 1541 4-3 57% 13 AZ
16420 863 Elite 15-2 pink 1541 32-24 57% 15 FL
16421 HOU STELLAR 14-Select 1541 11-6 61% 14 TX
16422 Northern Lights 13-R 1541 32-29 52% 13 MN
16423 DIG 13-Red 1541 15-10 58% 13 TX
16424 ECC 15-North national 1541 32-22 59% 15 NJ
16425 Intensity 16-Black 1541 21-14 60% 16 MD
16426 CALI 17-Blue 1541 32-30 52% 17 NY
16427 Dubuque Force Dubuque All Stars 13 1541 3-2 60% 13 IA
16428 Uptime VB 18-1 1541 22-15 59% 18 TN
16429 All City 11-S 1541 3-2 60% 11 IA
16430 Rize 11-Paul & alli 1541 5-2 56% 11 UT
16431 Top Select 16-Top white 1541 44-30 59% 16 FL
16432 NORCO 18-Blue 1541 19-11 63% 18 CO
16433 ESVC 13-Black 1541 18-21 46% 13 AL
16434 Bandits VBA 18-1 1541 32-18 64% 18 AZ
16435 RCVC 17-Raincity roar 1541 4-3 57% 17 WA
16436 HOU STELLAR 17-Select 1541 22-15 55% 17 TX
16437 Truepoint 18-S 1541 17-17 50% 18 TX
16438 VBR 18 1541 19-12 61% 18 LA
16439 Keweenaw VBC 18 1541 15-6 71% 18 WI
16440 North AL 13 EC 1541 16-10 55% 13 AL
16441 STARLINGSNVBC 13 1541 4-1 80% 13
16442 NEPA ELITE 14-Blizzard 1540 28-20 55% 14 PA
16443 Illini Elite 16-L red 1540 17-15 53% 16 IL
16444 Coulee Region Power 14-S 1540 6-3 67% 14 WI
16445 Synergy 14-Tornado 1540 29-26 53% 14 PA
16446 SynergyForce 12 Gold 1540 27-24 53% 12 CA
16447 Mineral Area 12-Velocity 1540 10-6 63% 12 MO
16448 Austin Skyline 16 Molten 1540 29-24 55% 16 TX
16449 MAVA 12-Tiger 1540 22-18 55% 12 KY
16450 MMP 13-1 1540 8-6 57% 13 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.