2025-2026 Season — Page 327 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16301 | SoDak Juniors 12 | 1542 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | MN |
| 16302 | MOJO Volleyball Academy 17-Pink | 1542 | 8-7 | 53% | 17 | MD |
| 16303 | CJVA 16-Diamond | 1542 | 18-18 | 50% | 16 | NJ |
| 16304 | Chisholm 11-1 | 1542 | 7-6 | 54% | 11 | MN |
| 16305 | Club 909-18-1 | 1542 | 23-22 | 51% | 18 | CA |
| 16306 | Madison Elite 14 Teal | 1542 | 38-28 | 58% | 14 | WI |
| 16307 | High Line 16-Aspiring pnk | 1542 | 26-19 | 57% | 16 | PA |
| 16308 | MVVC 17-White | 1542 | 20-26 | 43% | 17 | CA |
| 16309 | RDEVA 14-Reed | 1542 | 35-26 | 57% | 14 | CO |
| 16310 | 1W 17 Crimson | 1542 | 25-15 | 63% | 17 | WI |
| 16311 | BEVBC 17-Black | 1542 | 37-28 | 57% | 17 | MD |
| 16312 | AEV 16 National | 1542 | 21-22 | 49% | 16 | TX |
| 16313 | KIVA 10-Molly/chloe | 1542 | 2-1 | 67% | 10 | KY |
| 16314 | Kershaw Spark 12 | 1542 | 16-10 | 62% | 12 | SC |
| 16315 | WF Elite 13-White | 1542 | 22-11 | 56% | 13 | TX |
| 16316 | SEC Elite 13-Ty | 1542 | 2-1 | 67% | 13 | CO |
| 16317 | Gorge Juniors 14-1 | 1542 | 11-10 | 52% | 14 | OR |
| 16318 | OCVC 12-Josie | 1542 | 6-4 | 60% | 12 | WY |
| 16319 | Northwoods Extreme 14 | 1542 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | WI |
| 16320 | TN Heat 18-Power | 1542 | 18-14 | 56% | 18 | TN |
| 16321 | SF Juniors Volleyball 16-Black | 1542 | 4-3 | 57% | 16 | CA |
| 16322 | IA VIBE 14-2 teal | 1542 | 9-8 | 50% | 14 | IA |
| 16323 | Air Strike 18 AirStrike D (12) | 1542 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | MI |
| 16324 | Nassau Elite Volleyball Club 13 U13 Silver | 1542 | 10-7 | 59% | 13 | FL |
| 16325 | South Strand Heat 13 | 1542 | 24-17 | 59% | 13 | SC |
| 16326 | GOLDENBULLS 14-G black | 1542 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | FL |
| 16327 | CHAMP 16-1 | 1542 | 10-7 | 59% | 16 | AL |
| 16328 | Temecula Viper 13-2 ashlyn | 1542 | 21-17 | 55% | 13 | CA |
| 16329 | Galena Spikers Galena Invasion 12 | 1542 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | IA |
| 16330 | Excel NW 18-Gold | 1542 | 3-3 | 50% | 18 | WA |
| 16331 | NNJ 12-Jamie | 1542 | 32-21 | 60% | 12 | NV |
| 16332 | LA6 15-Jamie | 1542 | 19-14 | 56% | 15 | LA |
| 16333 | PowerPlex Iowa Heart 15-Black | 1542 | 3-3 | 50% | 15 | IA |
| 16334 | JAG VBC 13-3 | 1542 | 11-7 | 61% | 13 | WI |
| 16335 | Invasion 14-1 | 1542 | 21-14 | 58% | 14 | OR |
| 16336 | ACCEL 12-Black gualandri | 1541 | 12-9 | 52% | 12 | TX |
| 16337 | Train4F 14-1 | 1541 | 19-16 | 54% | 14 | OH |
| 16338 | L2 Volleyball Club 13 L2 231 | 1541 | 23-14 | 62% | 13 | MI |
| 16339 | Venom 11-Red | 1541 | 34-27 | 56% | 11 | AZ |
| 16340 | Intensity 16-Black | 1541 | 21-14 | 60% | 16 | MD |
| 16341 | Pillar 16-Purple | 1541 | 29-21 | 58% | 16 | OH |
| 16342 | LRVA 16-1 | 1541 | 3-1 | 75% | 16 | |
| 16343 | Burl Elite 11-Orange | 1541 | 11-8 | 58% | 11 | WI |
| 16344 | FaR Out 14-Garnet | 1541 | 21-9 | 70% | 14 | MI |
| 16345 | Lockdown VBC 14-Herons | 1541 | 27-16 | 63% | 14 | MA |
| 16346 | Kings County KCV 12-1 | 1541 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | NV |
| 16347 | Stars 15 Philip | 1541 | 45-27 | 63% | 15 | SC |
| 16348 | Nona Volleyball Academy 14 14 WILLIE (FL) | 1541 | 8-3 | 73% | 14 | FL |
| 16349 | Maroon Belles 14-Mindy | 1541 | 10-4 | 71% | 14 | CO |
| 16350 | Cape Cod 18-Marylou | 1541 | 15-4 | 71% | 18 | MA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.