Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 327 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16301 SoDak Juniors 12 1542 6-3 67% 12 MN
16302 MOJO Volleyball Academy 17-Pink 1542 8-7 53% 17 MD
16303 CJVA 16-Diamond 1542 18-18 50% 16 NJ
16304 Chisholm 11-1 1542 7-6 54% 11 MN
16305 Club 909-18-1 1542 23-22 51% 18 CA
16306 Madison Elite 14 Teal 1542 38-28 58% 14 WI
16307 High Line 16-Aspiring pnk 1542 26-19 57% 16 PA
16308 MVVC 17-White 1542 20-26 43% 17 CA
16309 RDEVA 14-Reed 1542 35-26 57% 14 CO
16310 1W 17 Crimson 1542 25-15 63% 17 WI
16311 BEVBC 17-Black 1542 37-28 57% 17 MD
16312 AEV 16 National 1542 21-22 49% 16 TX
16313 KIVA 10-Molly/chloe 1542 2-1 67% 10 KY
16314 Kershaw Spark 12 1542 16-10 62% 12 SC
16315 WF Elite 13-White 1542 22-11 56% 13 TX
16316 SEC Elite 13-Ty 1542 2-1 67% 13 CO
16317 Gorge Juniors 14-1 1542 11-10 52% 14 OR
16318 OCVC 12-Josie 1542 6-4 60% 12 WY
16319 Northwoods Extreme 14 1542 4-1 80% 14 WI
16320 TN Heat 18-Power 1542 18-14 56% 18 TN
16321 SF Juniors Volleyball 16-Black 1542 4-3 57% 16 CA
16322 IA VIBE 14-2 teal 1542 9-8 50% 14 IA
16323 Air Strike 18 AirStrike D (12) 1542 3-2 60% 18 MI
16324 Nassau Elite Volleyball Club 13 U13 Silver 1542 10-7 59% 13 FL
16325 South Strand Heat 13 1542 24-17 59% 13 SC
16326 GOLDENBULLS 14-G black 1542 9-6 60% 14 FL
16327 CHAMP 16-1 1542 10-7 59% 16 AL
16328 Temecula Viper 13-2 ashlyn 1542 21-17 55% 13 CA
16329 Galena Spikers Galena Invasion 12 1542 3-2 60% 12 IA
16330 Excel NW 18-Gold 1542 3-3 50% 18 WA
16331 NNJ 12-Jamie 1542 32-21 60% 12 NV
16332 LA6 15-Jamie 1542 19-14 56% 15 LA
16333 PowerPlex Iowa Heart 15-Black 1542 3-3 50% 15 IA
16334 JAG VBC 13-3 1542 11-7 61% 13 WI
16335 Invasion 14-1 1542 21-14 58% 14 OR
16336 ACCEL 12-Black gualandri 1541 12-9 52% 12 TX
16337 Train4F 14-1 1541 19-16 54% 14 OH
16338 L2 Volleyball Club 13 L2 231 1541 23-14 62% 13 MI
16339 Venom 11-Red 1541 34-27 56% 11 AZ
16340 Intensity 16-Black 1541 21-14 60% 16 MD
16341 Pillar 16-Purple 1541 29-21 58% 16 OH
16342 LRVA 16-1 1541 3-1 75% 16
16343 Burl Elite 11-Orange 1541 11-8 58% 11 WI
16344 FaR Out 14-Garnet 1541 21-9 70% 14 MI
16345 Lockdown VBC 14-Herons 1541 27-16 63% 14 MA
16346 Kings County KCV 12-1 1541 4-2 67% 12 NV
16347 Stars 15 Philip 1541 45-27 63% 15 SC
16348 Nona Volleyball Academy 14 14 WILLIE (FL) 1541 8-3 73% 14 FL
16349 Maroon Belles 14-Mindy 1541 10-4 71% 14 CO
16350 Cape Cod 18-Marylou 1541 15-4 71% 18 MA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.