Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 326 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16251 Shonto Starlings 15-1 1542 23-15 61% 15 AZ
16252 Falcon Fever 15 1542 3-2 60% 15 MN
16253 NLVA 18-Sam 1542 17-14 55% 18 CA
16254 Yakima Elite 14-Premier 1542 13-14 48% 14 WA
16255 Kansas Rise VBC 18-2 1542 11-9 55% 18 KS
16256 THNDR 16-2 1542 5-1 83% 16 OH
16257 FRVBC 17-White 1542 1-2 33% 17 CA
16258 Texas Pistols West 13-1 1542 21-16 57% 13 TX
16259 S-N-P 14-Alondra 1542 2-5 29% 14 CA
16260 MAC 14-1 1542 3-4 43% 14 MA
16261 Kali 11-F zuly 1542 5-1 83% 11 PR
16262 EVP Vision 13-3 1542 4-1 80% 13 ON
16263 Redline Zia VBC 12-1 1542 5-2 71% 12 CO
16264 New Waves 15-4 1542 4-2 67% 15 FL
16265 Mission 17 1542 4-2 67% 17 ON
16266 Pocono 17-1 1542 4-1 80% 17 PA
16267 Lady Lakers 14-S black 1542 4-1 67% 14 ND
16268 Rockawave Volleyball Training 12-3 sail 1542 13-8 62% 12 NY
16269 Altitude 12-Black 1542 40-34 53% 12 AZ
16270 GSA 14-Taniya 1542 8-5 62% 14 CA
16271 OK Charge 17-National 1542 22-33 40% 17 OK
16272 Club Z 13-Kylie 1542 19-12 61% 13 NM
16273 H. Skyline TW 15-3 1542 3-3 50% 15 TX
16274 Central VBC 12-1 1542 4-4 50% 12 NV
16275 Club V 18-Prodigy marcus 1542 25-30 45% 18 UT
16276 AVC CLE 14-Blue 1542 24-31 44% 14 OH
16277 East Texas 16-Black 1542 4-5 36% 16 TX
16278 The Edge 14 Elite 1542 19-23 45% 14 IL
16279 NC GOLD VOLLEYBALL 15-1 1542 0-0 0% 15 GA
16280 GRV 16-Black (LK) 1542 24-15 62% 16 MI
16281 Mizuno CNVBC 13-Corina 1542 14-15 48% 13 MO
16282 Fusion 13-Sparks 1542 13-9 59% 13 VT
16283 I AM VBC 16-Black 1542 30-42 42% 16 WI
16284 Aus Velocity 14-3 sapphire 1542 17-17 47% 14 TX
16285 Volitude 14-Blue 1542 17-18 49% 14 CA
16286 Touch 3 14-Green 1542 2-1 67% 14 CA
16287 CJVA 16-Diamond 1542 18-18 50% 16 NJ
16288 AEV 16 National 1542 21-22 49% 16 TX
16289 Main Beach 13-Premier 1542 5-5 50% 13 CA
16290 WAVE ALLIANCE 17 PRO 1542 41-19 68% 17 FL
16291 ND Elite 17-Gold 1542 6-4 60% 17 ND
16292 Hornets 17 1542 53-63 46% 17 NV
16293 SWI3D 17-Black 1542 8-7 53% 17 NE
16294 SoDak Juniors 12 1542 6-3 67% 12 MN
16295 Club 909-18-1 1542 23-22 51% 18 CA
16296 ELEVATE HI 16 1542 8-7 53% 16 HI
16297 MVVC 17-White 1542 20-26 43% 17 CA
16298 WF Elite 13-White 1542 22-11 56% 13 TX
16299 BEVBC 17-Black 1542 37-28 57% 17 MD
16300 Chisholm 11-1 1542 7-6 54% 11 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.