Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 325 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16201 Vortex 14-James 1543 20-13 57% 14 UT
16202 H2 17-Ua longhorns_geoff 1543 14-32 29% 17 MO
16203 San Diego VBC 13-Katie 1543 21-25 46% 13 CA
16204 Rise 14-Shai 1543 11-7 61% 14 CA
16205 Crosscourt 17 1543 24-26 46% 17 PA
16206 EKJV 18-Blue 1543 2-5 29% 18 KY
16207 WI Flight 18-Black 1543 18-19 49% 18 WI
16208 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 17-2 1543 4-5 27% 17 MO
16209 Avoli 13-F dariel 1543 7-8 47% 13 PR
16210 Five Starz 13-Black adri 1543 28-30 47% 13 CA
16211 TopSpin 18-Red 1543 16-23 41% 18 KY
16212 Pelican State 16 1543 16-23 41% 16 LA
16213 Hype VB 14-Howard 1543 6-3 50% 14 MS
16214 BRUSA 17-2 jim 1543 9-9 50% 17 CA
16215 417 Juniors G15-1 1543 1-1 20% 15 MO
16216 Aspire NW 11-1 empire 1543 18-22 43% 11 OR
16217 OVVC 15-Green 1543 19-15 56% 15 OH
16218 RVBC 17-Royal 1543 12-8 60% 17 PA
16219 United 16-2 GJ 1543 21-19 53% 16 CO
16220 Jr Cougars 13 1543 9-6 60% 13 NE
16221 Starlings GH 16-1 1543 22-16 58% 16 CT
16222 MADFROG 14-East diamond 1543 4-4 50% 14 TX
16223 RIZE 12-Sarah 1543 5-3 56% 12 ID
16224 Independent 12-Purple pickles 1543 3-1 75% 12 IN
16225 Flyers 17-Usa-jose 1543 12-21 34% 17 TX
16226 EXCELL 15-2 jess navy 1543 15-10 60% 15 SC
16227 South County 14-Erika 1543 4-14 22% 14 UT
16228 CUVC 13 Premier 1543 26-39 40% 13 NC
16229 Next 15-White 1543 28-26 52% 15 OH
16230 Raptors volleyball 14-Green 1543 6-3 67% 14 UT
16231 UNION 16-In white 1543 30-15 67% 16 IN
16232 Crank It 14-Gold 1543 23-14 62% 14 MI
16233 Kansas Rise VBC 14-2 1543 13-6 59% 14 KS
16234 Luverne Airborne 16 1543 3-1 75% 16 MN
16235 Raptors volleyball 15-Grey 1543 4-2 67% 15 UT
16236 STL Crossfire 14 R1 1543 30-17 64% 14 MO
16237 MAVS 12-Angie 1543 2-1 50% 12 KS
16238 Apex 18-National navy 1543 9-7 56% 18 MO
16239 Fusion 14-Blue (NO) 1543 4-2 67% 14 MN
16240 SPARKS VBC 15-RED 1542 27-22 55% 15 PA
16241 Lions Starved Rock 15-Blue 1542 11-7 55% 15 IL
16242 Onondaga Lightning 15 1542 8-4 67% 15 NY
16243 VolleyFX 18 Majestic 1542 20-12 61% 18 NY
16244 RC Rage 15 Billy 1542 13-7 65% 15 NC
16245 IMUA UVC 15-Ua 1542 30-22 58% 15 CA
16246 MoCo MAVS 11-Red 1542 8-6 53% 11 TX
16247 JAG VBC 13-3 1542 11-7 61% 13 WI
16248 Alpha Omega Volleyball G13-1 1542 7-6 47% 13 MO
16249 UNION 11-In white 1542 29-14 67% 11 IN
16250 IMPACT - 11-1 1542 12-5 57% 11 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.