Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 324 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16151 Southwest Smoke 14-1 1543 5-3 63% 14 KS
16152 1915 Excel VC 14-1 1543 8-5 62% 14 FL
16153 Club One AZ 14-Royal 1543 13-22 37% 14 AZ
16154 Rise 14-Shai 1543 11-7 61% 14 CA
16155 Capitals 15-United 1543 14-12 54% 15 NJ
16156 Aitkin 16-2 1543 3-1 75% 16 MN
16157 Eagan 13 1543 3-3 50% 13 MN
16158 Maunalani 18-Rise 1543 14-12 54% 18 HI
16159 CVT Phoenix 16-Black 1543 4-1 80% 16 NY
16160 Rage 12-Shahan 1543 12-12 50% 12 CA
16161 Aitkin 13-S 1543 3-2 60% 13 MN
16162 STL Crossfire 14 R1 1543 30-17 64% 14 MO
16163 FC United 17 Teal 1543 15-11 50% 17 MO
16164 Crank It 14-Gold 1543 23-14 62% 14 MI
16165 Panhandle Powerhouse 14-Kiraly 1543 3-2 60% 14 NE
16166 Athletic Empire 17 1543 18-11 62% 17 TX
16167 PCVBC 11-Lanham 1543 7-3 70% 11 OH
16168 Midway Elite SS 12-Royal 1543 6-4 60% 12 IL
16169 Guns Up VBC 12-Plainview 1543 15-12 56% 12 TX
16170 Barracuda 18-S 1543 19-15 56% 18 NC
16171 Sunshine 11-South bay 1543 15-12 56% 11 CA
16172 Huskies 17-Elite 1543 3-2 60% 17 SK
16173 Iowa Select 12-B/w 1543 2-1 67% 12 IA
16174 Snipers VBC 16 10 1543 9-11 41% 10 NV
16175 WAJ 15-Storm white 1543 5-4 45% 15 AL
16176 KC Fire Volleyball 11-1 1543 6-1 86% 11 KS
16177 MiElite 11-Pipeline west 1543 9-8 50% 11 MI
16178 SVC NGV 18-Natl 1543 12-16 43% 18 GA
16179 FCA Volleyball 17-1 1543 11-17 39% 17 ME
16180 UVA 15-S select 1543 2-3 40% 15 LA
16181 Bootheel SMASH 14 Bootheel SMASH Phoenix (GW) 1543 6-7 43% 14 MO
16182 Junior Bison Volleyball Club 15-Gold girls 1543 6-3 67% 15
16183 East Bay Volleyball Academy 16-Crimson 1543 15-23 39% 16 FL
16184 ABBA 13-1 1543 5-1 83% 13 OH
16185 StingrayVBA 14-Select js 1543 3-2 60% 14
16186 Apex Volleyball Academy 14 Apex Sawman (OV) 1543 3-1 75% 14 OH
16187 Central Rage Volleyball Club 15-Red 1543 4-3 57% 15
16188 RADD Elite 16-1 1543 18-23 44% 16 FL
16189 Cape Coast 18 ATLAS 1543 21-41 34% 18 FL
16190 SynergyForce 14 Gold 1543 22-30 42% 14 CA
16191 *Sartell 16-1 1543 3-2 60% 16 MN
16192 CMASS EDGE 14-Blue 1543 21-31 40% 14 MA
16193 IMUA UVC 13-Aqua 1543 19-14 58% 13 CA
16194 Vortex 14-James 1543 20-13 57% 14 UT
16195 H2 17-Ua longhorns_geoff 1543 14-32 29% 17 MO
16196 San Diego VBC 13-Katie 1543 21-25 46% 13 CA
16197 Crosscourt 17 1543 24-26 46% 17 PA
16198 EKJV 18-Blue 1543 2-5 29% 18 KY
16199 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 17-2 1543 4-5 27% 17 MO
16200 WI Flight 18-Black 1543 18-19 49% 18 WI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.