2025-2026 Season — Page 323 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16101 | Pulse 12-Black | 1544 | 17-11 | 61% | 12 | CA |
| 16102 | 310VBC 14-S ryan | 1544 | 12-8 | 60% | 14 | CA |
| 16103 | WAVE 16-Rose | 1544 | 16-11 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 16104 | APXVB 14-Kelsey | 1544 | 27-23 | 52% | 14 | UT |
| 16105 | CVVC 18-1 | 1544 | 6-13 | 32% | 18 | UT |
| 16106 | NVA 13-Elite gio | 1544 | 33-23 | 59% | 13 | FL |
| 16107 | RVA G13-White | 1544 | 19-15 | 56% | 13 | WI |
| 16108 | DYNASTY 17 Gold | 1544 | 16-21 | 43% | 17 | KS |
| 16109 | Volitude 14-Black | 1544 | 17-12 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 16110 | Volleycats 11 | 1544 | 9-6 | 50% | 11 | IA |
| 16111 | DBQ Elite Gold 16 | 1544 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | IA |
| 16112 | RRHEATVB 17-1 jen | 1544 | 2-6 | 25% | 17 | UT |
| 16113 | 2Legit 16-1 black | 1544 | 6-5 | 55% | 16 | FL |
| 16114 | North Lake Desert Diggers 12-1 | 1544 | 5-3 | 63% | 12 | ID |
| 16115 | Loser of M 13 | 1544 | 1-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 16116 | Sunshine 11-Tornadoes | 1544 | 3-0 | 100% | 11 | CA |
| 16117 | PAO STL 14-Rda green | 1544 | 30-20 | 60% | 14 | MO |
| 16118 | T10 Jrs 16-1 | 1544 | 3-1 | 60% | 16 | NE |
| 16119 | HV United VBC 12-Red | 1544 | 14-8 | 58% | 12 | MI |
| 16120 | City 15-Blue | 1544 | 27-27 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 16121 | VVA-Butte 14-Alicia | 1544 | 11-19 | 31% | 14 | MT |
| 16122 | Split Mountain Volleyball Club 14 Split Mountain Lindsay | 1544 | 7-4 | 64% | 14 | UT |
| 16123 | AAVC 14-NATL | 1544 | 15-10 | 60% | 14 | NC |
| 16124 | Blue Royals 14 Coral | 1544 | 35-24 | 59% | 14 | WA |
| 16125 | SoCal VBC 15-Frazee | 1544 | 18-26 | 41% | 15 | CA |
| 16126 | New York Elite 15-Blue | 1544 | 18-9 | 67% | 15 | NY |
| 16127 | NorCal Supreme 16-Blue | 1544 | 12-8 | 60% | 16 | CA |
| 16128 | FCV 11-1 | 1544 | 4-3 | 50% | 11 | NE |
| 16129 | Team Momentum 15-Navy | 1544 | 33-38 | 46% | 15 | MO |
| 16130 | RAMS 16-1 | 1544 | 14-8 | 64% | 16 | OR |
| 16131 | Madtown 14-1 regional | 1544 | 13-8 | 57% | 14 | WI |
| 16132 | NYC Impact 18-Black | 1544 | 26-21 | 55% | 18 | NY |
| 16133 | Rogue330 Volleyball Club 16 16R FLAME (OV) | 1544 | 8-5 | 62% | 16 | |
| 16134 | Team Momentum 16 Navy | 1544 | 20-26 | 43% | 16 | MO |
| 16135 | Tstreet SN 18-Alyse | 1543 | 21-9 | 70% | 18 | NV |
| 16136 | Venom Jo Volleyball 14-Black | 1543 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | MN |
| 16137 | GSA 11 | 1543 | 6-5 | 55% | 11 | ID |
| 16138 | Tstreet 14-Gabi | 1543 | 16-12 | 57% | 14 | CA |
| 16139 | Northern Attack 12-1 | 1543 | 6-7 | 43% | 12 | MN |
| 16140 | Katy United 15-Navy | 1543 | 19-13 | 58% | 15 | TX |
| 16141 | ABV Flash 16-S - caroline | 1543 | 14-14 | 50% | 16 | CA |
| 16142 | FH 16-Alaka'i-hannah | 1543 | 17-14 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 16143 | WSRVC 12-Evie | 1543 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | WY |
| 16144 | RCVS 12-2 glori | 1543 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | PR |
| 16145 | MWM 15 | 1543 | 12-6 | 67% | 15 | IL |
| 16146 | BVC 14-Elite | 1543 | 9-8 | 53% | 14 | MN |
| 16147 | AVA TX 14-Attack | 1543 | 25-25 | 50% | 14 | TX |
| 16148 | Black Swamp 10-2 | 1543 | 8-6 | 57% | 10 | OH |
| 16149 | Huskies 17-Elite | 1543 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | SK |
| 16150 | Eclipse Volleyball Club 14 EVC Seigley-Queens (OV) | 1543 | 11-6 | 65% | 14 |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.