Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 323 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16101 Pulse 12-Black 1544 17-11 61% 12 CA
16102 310VBC 14-S ryan 1544 12-8 60% 14 CA
16103 WAVE 16-Rose 1544 16-11 59% 16 CA
16104 APXVB 14-Kelsey 1544 27-23 52% 14 UT
16105 CVVC 18-1 1544 6-13 32% 18 UT
16106 NVA 13-Elite gio 1544 33-23 59% 13 FL
16107 RVA G13-White 1544 19-15 56% 13 WI
16108 DYNASTY 17 Gold 1544 16-21 43% 17 KS
16109 Volitude 14-Black 1544 17-12 59% 14 CA
16110 Volleycats 11 1544 9-6 50% 11 IA
16111 DBQ Elite Gold 16 1544 3-2 60% 16 IA
16112 RRHEATVB 17-1 jen 1544 2-6 25% 17 UT
16113 2Legit 16-1 black 1544 6-5 55% 16 FL
16114 North Lake Desert Diggers 12-1 1544 5-3 63% 12 ID
16115 Loser of M 13 1544 1-0 100% 13
16116 Sunshine 11-Tornadoes 1544 3-0 100% 11 CA
16117 PAO STL 14-Rda green 1544 30-20 60% 14 MO
16118 T10 Jrs 16-1 1544 3-1 60% 16 NE
16119 HV United VBC 12-Red 1544 14-8 58% 12 MI
16120 City 15-Blue 1544 27-27 50% 15 CA
16121 VVA-Butte 14-Alicia 1544 11-19 31% 14 MT
16122 Split Mountain Volleyball Club 14 Split Mountain Lindsay 1544 7-4 64% 14 UT
16123 AAVC 14-NATL 1544 15-10 60% 14 NC
16124 Blue Royals 14 Coral 1544 35-24 59% 14 WA
16125 SoCal VBC 15-Frazee 1544 18-26 41% 15 CA
16126 New York Elite 15-Blue 1544 18-9 67% 15 NY
16127 NorCal Supreme 16-Blue 1544 12-8 60% 16 CA
16128 FCV 11-1 1544 4-3 50% 11 NE
16129 Team Momentum 15-Navy 1544 33-38 46% 15 MO
16130 RAMS 16-1 1544 14-8 64% 16 OR
16131 Madtown 14-1 regional 1544 13-8 57% 14 WI
16132 NYC Impact 18-Black 1544 26-21 55% 18 NY
16133 Rogue330 Volleyball Club 16 16R FLAME (OV) 1544 8-5 62% 16
16134 Team Momentum 16 Navy 1544 20-26 43% 16 MO
16135 Tstreet SN 18-Alyse 1543 21-9 70% 18 NV
16136 Venom Jo Volleyball 14-Black 1543 4-1 80% 14 MN
16137 GSA 11 1543 6-5 55% 11 ID
16138 Tstreet 14-Gabi 1543 16-12 57% 14 CA
16139 Northern Attack 12-1 1543 6-7 43% 12 MN
16140 Katy United 15-Navy 1543 19-13 58% 15 TX
16141 ABV Flash 16-S - caroline 1543 14-14 50% 16 CA
16142 FH 16-Alaka'i-hannah 1543 17-14 50% 16 TX
16143 WSRVC 12-Evie 1543 4-2 67% 12 WY
16144 RCVS 12-2 glori 1543 5-1 83% 12 PR
16145 MWM 15 1543 12-6 67% 15 IL
16146 BVC 14-Elite 1543 9-8 53% 14 MN
16147 AVA TX 14-Attack 1543 25-25 50% 14 TX
16148 Black Swamp 10-2 1543 8-6 57% 10 OH
16149 Huskies 17-Elite 1543 3-2 60% 17 SK
16150 Eclipse Volleyball Club 14 EVC Seigley-Queens (OV) 1543 11-6 65% 14
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.