2025-2026 Season — Page 322 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16051 | DVC 17-Elite | 1544 | 12-9 | 57% | 17 | OH |
| 16052 | LA South 10 GOLD | 1544 | 22-14 | 59% | 10 | LA |
| 16053 | BVC GU 14 | 1544 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | NJ |
| 16054 | South Bay 18-Black | 1544 | 21-14 | 60% | 18 | NY |
| 16055 | Tenacity 12-1 | 1544 | 15-9 | 60% | 12 | WI |
| 16056 | TOVC 10-Edwin | 1544 | 5-2 | 71% | 10 | PR |
| 16057 | Starlings Tucson 16-Red | 1544 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | CA |
| 16058 | FEVA 17-1 | 1544 | 28-37 | 43% | 17 | WA |
| 16059 | VOLT 11-Power | 1544 | 5-4 | 42% | 11 | ND |
| 16060 | BRUSA 15 Costa | 1544 | 27-15 | 64% | 15 | CA |
| 16061 | ATOWN 15-1b | 1544 | 22-15 | 59% | 15 | SC |
| 16062 | Five Star 15-Black | 1544 | 29-25 | 54% | 15 | CO |
| 16063 | MN Select 11-2 | 1544 | 20-19 | 51% | 11 | MN |
| 16064 | Garrett United 15-1 | 1544 | 16-14 | 53% | 15 | OH |
| 16065 | Lakas 16-Elite | 1544 | 18-26 | 41% | 16 | CA |
| 16066 | 1W 16 Onyx | 1544 | 15-10 | 60% | 16 | WI |
| 16067 | Black Swamp 11-2 | 1544 | 13-9 | 59% | 11 | OH |
| 16068 | Hollywood 14-2 inspire american | 1544 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | OH |
| 16069 | W Pride 16-1 | 1544 | 13-8 | 62% | 16 | NY |
| 16070 | CWAVE Fralick-Hive 12 | 1544 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | OH |
| 16071 | OVA 14-G elite | 1544 | 28-29 | 49% | 14 | AZ |
| 16072 | JJVA Club 14-E | 1544 | 10-5 | 67% | 14 | FL |
| 16073 | Allegheny Volleyball Club 14-White | 1544 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | PA |
| 16074 | Eastside Ice Tempest 18-1 | 1544 | 43-29 | 56% | 18 | NY |
| 16075 | MAVS 816 13-1 | 1544 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | KS |
| 16076 | Vegas VolleyStars 16-1 | 1544 | 19-20 | 49% | 16 | CA |
| 16077 | FEVA 18-1 | 1544 | 24-14 | 63% | 18 | WA |
| 16078 | NJVBC 12-Aces | 1544 | 8-7 | 53% | 12 | NJ |
| 16079 | MAULOA LEHUA 14 | 1544 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | HI |
| 16080 | JJVA Club 14-D | 1544 | 9-6 | 60% | 14 | FL |
| 16081 | Loser of M 13 | 1544 | 1-0 | 100% | 13 | |
| 16082 | City 15-Blue | 1544 | 27-27 | 50% | 15 | CA |
| 16083 | Velocity 11-Black | 1544 | 24-17 | 57% | 11 | MS |
| 16084 | PCV 16-1 | 1544 | 6-3 | 67% | 16 | WA |
| 16085 | Ho'okahi 17 | 1544 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | HI |
| 16086 | Infinity 17-Navy | 1544 | 12-10 | 55% | 17 | WI |
| 16087 | AVA 14-R maurer | 1544 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 16088 | Battle Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1544 | 8-5 | 62% | 13 | VA |
| 16089 | Rhythm 15 Elite | 1544 | 24-17 | 57% | 15 | TN |
| 16090 | AAVC 14-Black | 1544 | 15-13 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 16091 | SCI ACES 16 | 1544 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | IA |
| 16092 | DG Warriors 17-Gold | 1544 | 25-19 | 57% | 17 | OH |
| 16093 | Xcel VB 13-1 purple | 1544 | 17-9 | 59% | 13 | AL |
| 16094 | PR Arsenal 12 | 1544 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | PR |
| 16095 | NOVA Juniors 12-S navy | 1544 | 10-6 | 63% | 12 | OH |
| 16096 | Buffalo Stampeders 11-1 | 1544 | 33-26 | 56% | 11 | FL |
| 16097 | Wizard 15 | 1544 | 25-24 | 51% | 15 | FL |
| 16098 | Horseshoe VBC 16-White | 1544 | 14-9 | 58% | 16 | PA |
| 16099 | WSA Gators 12-Regional | 1544 | 4-1 | 80% | 12 | FL |
| 16100 | ARSEL 13-1 | 1544 | 11-11 | 50% | 13 | PR |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.