Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 322 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16051 DVC 17-Elite 1544 12-9 57% 17 OH
16052 LA South 10 GOLD 1544 22-14 59% 10 LA
16053 BVC GU 14 1544 6-4 60% 14 NJ
16054 South Bay 18-Black 1544 21-14 60% 18 NY
16055 Tenacity 12-1 1544 15-9 60% 12 WI
16056 TOVC 10-Edwin 1544 5-2 71% 10 PR
16057 Starlings Tucson 16-Red 1544 5-4 56% 16 CA
16058 FEVA 17-1 1544 28-37 43% 17 WA
16059 VOLT 11-Power 1544 5-4 42% 11 ND
16060 BRUSA 15 Costa 1544 27-15 64% 15 CA
16061 ATOWN 15-1b 1544 22-15 59% 15 SC
16062 Five Star 15-Black 1544 29-25 54% 15 CO
16063 MN Select 11-2 1544 20-19 51% 11 MN
16064 Garrett United 15-1 1544 16-14 53% 15 OH
16065 Lakas 16-Elite 1544 18-26 41% 16 CA
16066 1W 16 Onyx 1544 15-10 60% 16 WI
16067 Black Swamp 11-2 1544 13-9 59% 11 OH
16068 Hollywood 14-2 inspire american 1544 4-2 67% 14 OH
16069 W Pride 16-1 1544 13-8 62% 16 NY
16070 CWAVE Fralick-Hive 12 1544 3-2 60% 12 OH
16071 OVA 14-G elite 1544 28-29 49% 14 AZ
16072 JJVA Club 14-E 1544 10-5 67% 14 FL
16073 Allegheny Volleyball Club 14-White 1544 3-1 75% 14 PA
16074 Eastside Ice Tempest 18-1 1544 43-29 56% 18 NY
16075 MAVS 816 13-1 1544 3-2 60% 13 KS
16076 Vegas VolleyStars 16-1 1544 19-20 49% 16 CA
16077 FEVA 18-1 1544 24-14 63% 18 WA
16078 NJVBC 12-Aces 1544 8-7 53% 12 NJ
16079 MAULOA LEHUA 14 1544 3-2 60% 14 HI
16080 JJVA Club 14-D 1544 9-6 60% 14 FL
16081 Loser of M 13 1544 1-0 100% 13
16082 City 15-Blue 1544 27-27 50% 15 CA
16083 Velocity 11-Black 1544 24-17 57% 11 MS
16084 PCV 16-1 1544 6-3 67% 16 WA
16085 Ho'okahi 17 1544 3-2 60% 17 HI
16086 Infinity 17-Navy 1544 12-10 55% 17 WI
16087 AVA 14-R maurer 1544 6-4 60% 14 OH
16088 Battle Volleyball Club 13-1 1544 8-5 62% 13 VA
16089 Rhythm 15 Elite 1544 24-17 57% 15 TN
16090 AAVC 14-Black 1544 15-13 54% 14 CA
16091 SCI ACES 16 1544 5-4 56% 16 IA
16092 DG Warriors 17-Gold 1544 25-19 57% 17 OH
16093 Xcel VB 13-1 purple 1544 17-9 59% 13 AL
16094 PR Arsenal 12 1544 4-1 80% 12 PR
16095 NOVA Juniors 12-S navy 1544 10-6 63% 12 OH
16096 Buffalo Stampeders 11-1 1544 33-26 56% 11 FL
16097 Wizard 15 1544 25-24 51% 15 FL
16098 Horseshoe VBC 16-White 1544 14-9 58% 16 PA
16099 WSA Gators 12-Regional 1544 4-1 80% 12 FL
16100 ARSEL 13-1 1544 11-11 50% 13 PR
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.