2025-2026 Season — Page 321 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16001 | Fusion 17 | 1545 | 8-6 | 57% | 17 | MN |
| 16002 | HF Volleyball 14-1 | 1545 | 36-25 | 58% | 14 | TN |
| 16003 | CinciVB Acad 13-1 | 1545 | 7-24 | 23% | 13 | OH |
| 16004 | AAVA 18-1 storm | 1545 | 15-26 | 37% | 18 | OR |
| 16005 | IVC 14 Blaze | 1545 | 5-2 | 63% | 14 | ND |
| 16006 | NE Storm 16-Avalanche | 1545 | 27-31 | 47% | 16 | MA |
| 16007 | Texas Pistols West 12-1 | 1545 | 11-8 | 58% | 12 | TX |
| 16008 | Firehawks 18-1 | 1545 | 8-4 | 67% | 18 | AZ |
| 16009 | GVC 15 | 1545 | 3-1 | 60% | 15 | IA |
| 16010 | Tri-State Elite 10-Blue | 1545 | 11-8 | 58% | 10 | KY |
| 16011 | CSTORM 16-Green | 1545 | 35-27 | 56% | 16 | OH |
| 16012 | HHVBC 14-1b | 1545 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | IA |
| 16013 | CUVC 13-Sn elizabeth | 1545 | 9-7 | 56% | 13 | NC |
| 16014 | Lakeview Volleyball 17-1 | 1545 | 2-4 | 25% | 17 | SD |
| 16015 | LAV 12-Local black | 1545 | 16-12 | 57% | 12 | AL |
| 16016 | DBQ Insanity 14-4 white | 1545 | 16-11 | 55% | 14 | IA |
| 16017 | CVC 12-Ln | 1545 | 2-1 | 67% | 12 | ND |
| 16018 | Tstreet LV 13-Melane | 1545 | 6-7 | 46% | 13 | CA |
| 16019 | Olympic Premier OPVBC 14-National | 1545 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | NV |
| 16020 | SEVA 13-Navy alexia | 1545 | 7-3 | 70% | 13 | NC |
| 16021 | BVC 15 Morgan | 1545 | 16-20 | 44% | 15 | CA |
| 16022 | Johnston 14 National | 1545 | 15-14 | 50% | 14 | IA |
| 16023 | EVA 15-White | 1545 | 25-14 | 64% | 15 | AR |
| 16024 | SVC 16-Blue national | 1545 | 16-16 | 50% | 16 | MO |
| 16025 | Maricopa 12-Navy | 1545 | 4-3 | 57% | 12 | CA |
| 16026 | HVVC 14-Grey | 1545 | 26-11 | 70% | 14 | MI |
| 16027 | SWI3D 12-Black | 1545 | 2-0 | 40% | 12 | NE |
| 16028 | HOVA 12-R red | 1545 | 8-6 | 57% | 12 | OH |
| 16029 | Denali - MVC 16 | 1545 | 15-16 | 48% | 16 | ON |
| 16030 | BONNEVILLE 16-Kinley | 1545 | 6-10 | 32% | 16 | ID |
| 16031 | RVC 14-Blue | 1545 | 42-19 | 69% | 14 | KY |
| 16032 | Barr-Reeve Volleyball Club 14 Barr-Reeve Black (Tyler) | 1545 | 8-4 | 62% | 14 | |
| 16033 | Sky Spikers 14 | 1545 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | PR |
| 16034 | Sideout VBC 14-1 | 1545 | 2-5 | 29% | 14 | WA |
| 16035 | AVA 14-R miller | 1545 | 7-4 | 64% | 14 | OH |
| 16036 | Putnam 17-R ashland | 1545 | 15-6 | 71% | 17 | OH |
| 16037 | Galena Spikers 16 | 1545 | 11-11 | 46% | 16 | IA |
| 16038 | SPVB 16 Navy | 1545 | 5-1 | 83% | 16 | IL |
| 16039 | Premier 18 Crimson | 1545 | 18-19 | 46% | 18 | TX |
| 16040 | Peak 17-Black | 1545 | 24-25 | 49% | 17 | FL |
| 16041 | Midwest Penguins 16-N | 1544 | 42-28 | 60% | 16 | WI |
| 16042 | VolleyFX 17 Illusion | 1544 | 26-17 | 59% | 17 | NY |
| 16043 | 501 Volley 16-2 national | 1544 | 27-36 | 42% | 16 | AR |
| 16044 | NEVA 14-1 | 1544 | 12-5 | 71% | 14 | PR |
| 16045 | UtahIce Kristin 15 | 1544 | 3-3 | 43% | 15 | UT |
| 16046 | Venom Jo Volleyball 12-Black | 1544 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | MN |
| 16047 | FC Elite 13-Hawks | 1544 | 7-3 | 70% | 13 | WI |
| 16048 | Lady Sharx 16-Black | 1544 | 17-9 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 16049 | Nestor 14-Marley | 1544 | 2-6 | 25% | 14 | CA |
| 16050 | OK PEAK 14-5 | 1544 | 20-15 | 56% | 14 | OK |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.