Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 321 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
16001 Fusion 17 1545 8-6 57% 17 MN
16002 HF Volleyball 14-1 1545 36-25 58% 14 TN
16003 CinciVB Acad 13-1 1545 7-24 23% 13 OH
16004 AAVA 18-1 storm 1545 15-26 37% 18 OR
16005 IVC 14 Blaze 1545 5-2 63% 14 ND
16006 NE Storm 16-Avalanche 1545 27-31 47% 16 MA
16007 Texas Pistols West 12-1 1545 11-8 58% 12 TX
16008 Firehawks 18-1 1545 8-4 67% 18 AZ
16009 GVC 15 1545 3-1 60% 15 IA
16010 Tri-State Elite 10-Blue 1545 11-8 58% 10 KY
16011 CSTORM 16-Green 1545 35-27 56% 16 OH
16012 HHVBC 14-1b 1545 3-1 75% 14 IA
16013 CUVC 13-Sn elizabeth 1545 9-7 56% 13 NC
16014 Lakeview Volleyball 17-1 1545 2-4 25% 17 SD
16015 LAV 12-Local black 1545 16-12 57% 12 AL
16016 DBQ Insanity 14-4 white 1545 16-11 55% 14 IA
16017 CVC 12-Ln 1545 2-1 67% 12 ND
16018 Tstreet LV 13-Melane 1545 6-7 46% 13 CA
16019 Olympic Premier OPVBC 14-National 1545 4-3 57% 14 NV
16020 SEVA 13-Navy alexia 1545 7-3 70% 13 NC
16021 BVC 15 Morgan 1545 16-20 44% 15 CA
16022 Johnston 14 National 1545 15-14 50% 14 IA
16023 EVA 15-White 1545 25-14 64% 15 AR
16024 SVC 16-Blue national 1545 16-16 50% 16 MO
16025 Maricopa 12-Navy 1545 4-3 57% 12 CA
16026 HVVC 14-Grey 1545 26-11 70% 14 MI
16027 SWI3D 12-Black 1545 2-0 40% 12 NE
16028 HOVA 12-R red 1545 8-6 57% 12 OH
16029 Denali - MVC 16 1545 15-16 48% 16 ON
16030 BONNEVILLE 16-Kinley 1545 6-10 32% 16 ID
16031 RVC 14-Blue 1545 42-19 69% 14 KY
16032 Barr-Reeve Volleyball Club 14 Barr-Reeve Black (Tyler) 1545 8-4 62% 14
16033 Sky Spikers 14 1545 3-1 75% 14 PR
16034 Sideout VBC 14-1 1545 2-5 29% 14 WA
16035 AVA 14-R miller 1545 7-4 64% 14 OH
16036 Putnam 17-R ashland 1545 15-6 71% 17 OH
16037 Galena Spikers 16 1545 11-11 46% 16 IA
16038 SPVB 16 Navy 1545 5-1 83% 16 IL
16039 Premier 18 Crimson 1545 18-19 46% 18 TX
16040 Peak 17-Black 1545 24-25 49% 17 FL
16041 Midwest Penguins 16-N 1544 42-28 60% 16 WI
16042 VolleyFX 17 Illusion 1544 26-17 59% 17 NY
16043 501 Volley 16-2 national 1544 27-36 42% 16 AR
16044 NEVA 14-1 1544 12-5 71% 14 PR
16045 UtahIce Kristin 15 1544 3-3 43% 15 UT
16046 Venom Jo Volleyball 12-Black 1544 6-3 67% 12 MN
16047 FC Elite 13-Hawks 1544 7-3 70% 13 WI
16048 Lady Sharx 16-Black 1544 17-9 65% 16 CA
16049 Nestor 14-Marley 1544 2-6 25% 14 CA
16050 OK PEAK 14-5 1544 20-15 56% 14 OK
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.