Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 316 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15751 MSVB 15-R tyler/eleasha 1548 7-10 41% 15 AK
15752 Storm 13-National black 1548 7-8 47% 13 TX
15753 MVIce 13-P paula 1548 12-10 46% 13 ID
15754 KPV 15-Pink-zach 1548 23-27 46% 15 KY
15755 Metro Volleyball Club 15-Central 1548 23-16 53% 15 DC
15756 Skyline 12-White iv/adrian 1548 3-2 60% 12 TX
15757 SIVBA 12-Turquoise 1548 9-6 50% 12 MO
15758 NKYVC 17-3 typhoon 1548 25-28 47% 17 KY
15759 TX432 14-1 1548 3-4 43% 14 TX
15760 Reign 14-S 1548 26-16 62% 14 TX
15761 WTM 13-1 1548 13-12 52% 13 TX
15762 Texas Coastal 14-Maroon 1548 2-1 67% 14 TX
15763 WENTZVILLE HEAT 15-1 navy 1548 26-15 59% 15 MO
15764 VLBR NC 14-Tara 1548 10-10 50% 14 NC
15765 ThunderVanbc 16-2 1548 3-4 43% 16 WA
15766 Coqui VBC 15-Slunks 1548 12-18 40% 15 MS
15767 TriCounty ATTACK 14-2 1548 17-9 65% 14 NJ
15768 M2 Volleyball 15-N1 1548 33-21 61% 15 GA
15769 Starlings Tucson 14-White 1548 4-2 67% 14 CA
15770 Sportime 13-Gold 1548 16-26 38% 13 NY
15771 Kokoro Volleyball 16-3 1548 40-31 56% 16 MN
15772 LAVA North 14-Molten 1548 20-21 49% 14 CA
15773 MPCG-FS Attack Volleyball 12-1 1548 3-2 60% 12 ND
15774 Independent 11-Julia 1548 2-1 67% 11 IN
15775 SRVC Tide 13 1548 25-14 63% 13 MD
15776 TX VISION 14-BLACK 1548 17-16 52% 14 TX
15777 Integrity 17-Intense red 1548 18-18 45% 17 PA
15778 SOSVBC 17-N artem 1548 8-10 44% 17 NY
15779 Central Oregon COVC 16-National 1548 4-4 50% 16 NV
15780 AP 17-Wilco yellow 1547 30-23 57% 17 TX
15781 Belusa United 16 Ice 1547 30-12 71% 16 IL
15782 MARIN 16-Slate 1547 29-24 55% 16 CA
15783 Monon 11-2r shock 1547 23-14 62% 11 IN
15784 Summit 12-Blue elite 1547 20-19 51% 12 IN
15785 Hermantown 16-Black 1547 14-11 56% 16 MN
15786 Mass Premier 15-2 1547 24-21 53% 15 MA
15787 Stingray Black 15-1 1547 14-14 50% 15 CA
15788 Ignite Volleyball Club 16 16U Premier 1547 3-3 50% 16 UT
15789 BVC 14-1 regional - rob s 1547 17-13 57% 14 AL
15790 LHV Girls 15-3 prowl 1547 24-11 69% 15 MA
15791 Triangle 13 Silver 1547 15-13 54% 13 NC
15792 IA VIBE 16-1 nike 1547 26-17 60% 16 IA
15793 No Limits 15 National (NTR) 1547 21-18 49% 15
15794 Richmond Volleyball Club 13 RVC VYVL Team MG 1547 3-2 60% 13
15795 OVVC 13-Green 1547 6-4 60% 13 OH
15796 DACAN 13-2 blitz 1547 3-2 60% 13 NY
15797 WVC 18-1 navy 1547 21-9 62% 18 MO
15798 AEV 13-Regional 1547 9-6 60% 13 TX
15799 Performance 17-1 national 1547 20-9 69% 17
15800 MMVC 16 Gold 1547 20-15 57% 16 WV
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.