Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 317 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15801 Carolina One 12 C1VB Juniors Liz J (PM) (17) 1547 4-2 67% 12 SC
15802 TAV Houston 15 Royal 1547 18-15 53% 15 TX
15803 IA VIBE 16-1 nike 1547 26-17 60% 16 IA
15804 Raiders 10-S 1547 2-1 67% 10 MN
15805 AEV 13-Regional 1547 9-6 60% 13 TX
15806 Battle Volleyball Club 12-1 1547 6-3 67% 12 VA
15807 MCVC White 14-1 1547 5-3 63% 14 IN
15808 MMVC 16 Gold 1547 20-15 57% 16 WV
15809 XVC 15 1547 5-2 71% 15 OH
15810 SSP Storm 18-Select 1547 41-36 53% 18 FL
15811 WVBA 15-Elite black 1547 35-27 56% 15 FL
15812 Back Bay Volleyball 12 1547 3-1 75% 12 VA
15813 St. Croix Select 14 SC Select Teal (BG) 1547 14-8 64% 14 WI
15814 Ignite Volleyball Club 16 16U Premier 1547 3-3 50% 16 UT
15815 Wildcats 15-1 1547 8-5 62% 15 MN
15816 VolleyFX 12 Dream 1547 14-9 52% 12 NY
15817 Monon 11-2r shock 1547 23-14 62% 11 IN
15818 Legend 18U Blue 1547 7-2 54% 18 CA
15819 Mass Premier 15-2 1547 24-21 53% 15 MA
15820 Hermantown 16-Black 1547 14-11 56% 16 MN
15821 Triangle 13 Silver 1547 15-13 54% 13 NC
15822 MARIN 16-Slate 1547 29-24 55% 16 CA
15823 BVC 14-1 regional - rob s 1547 17-13 57% 14 AL
15824 Stingray Black 15-1 1547 14-14 50% 15 CA
15825 Belusa United 16 Ice 1547 30-12 71% 16 IL
15826 Lineshot 14-Purple national 1547 17-8 68% 14 OH
15827 DACAN 13-2 blitz 1547 3-2 60% 13 NY
15828 WVC 18-1 navy 1547 21-9 62% 18 MO
15829 Performance 17-1 national 1547 20-9 69% 17
15830 RVC 14 Zonal 1547 39-26 60% 14 VA
15831 Outsiders 13-Z 1547 20-9 69% 13 IN
15832 Indy United 18-1 1547 40-20 67% 18 IN
15833 Summit Surge 14-A 1547 6-1 86% 14 TN
15834 USYVL El Segundo 13u 1547 15-4 79% 13 CA
15835 VV U13 1547 19-12 56% 13 VA
15836 308 Elite VBC 18 1547 9-7 56% 18
15837 Accelerate 13 1547 3-1 75% 13 LA
15838 Club Velocity YDT 12-Black 1547 2-0 100% 12 MN
15839 New WaveS 11-Lydia 1547 14-11 56% 11 FL
15840 CinciVB Acad 10-2 1547 3-1 75% 10 OH
15841 Rogue 13-Go 1547 30-33 48% 13 OH
15842 AP 15-Lite highlighter 1547 14-6 70% 15 TX
15843 Iron VC 13-1 1547 10-2 67% 13 AL
15844 Summit 12-Blue elite 1547 20-19 51% 12 IN
15845 SPRING Mini 407 13-Shae 1547 3-1 75% 13 FL
15846 AP 17-Wilco yellow 1547 30-23 57% 17 TX
15847 Richmond Volleyball Club 13 RVC VYVL Team MG 1547 3-2 60% 13
15848 No Limits 15 National (NTR) 1547 21-18 49% 15
15849 Elite Juniors 14-1 1547 6-3 67% 14 OH
15850 Valkyries 17 Elite 1547 38-35 52% 17 IN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.