2025-2026 Season — Page 315 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15701 | SIVA 16 LYNDSEY | 1548 | 29-19 | 60% | 16 | WA |
| 15702 | Sky High 17-1 | 1548 | 7-2 | 78% | 17 | TX |
| 15703 | Independent 11-Julia | 1548 | 2-1 | 67% | 11 | IN |
| 15704 | Iowa Alliance 16-Black | 1548 | 4-2 | 67% | 16 | IA |
| 15705 | Marshall JO 15-Orange | 1548 | 7-4 | 64% | 15 | MN |
| 15706 | TriCounty ATTACK 14-2 | 1548 | 17-9 | 65% | 14 | NJ |
| 15707 | East Texas 12-Black | 1548 | 6-3 | 67% | 12 | LA |
| 15708 | Texas Coastal 14-Maroon | 1548 | 2-1 | 67% | 14 | TX |
| 15709 | Wave 15-Tide | 1548 | 22-11 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 15710 | Xtreme VBC 15 Adidas | 1548 | 27-18 | 60% | 15 | WI |
| 15711 | Kokoro Volleyball 16-3 | 1548 | 40-31 | 56% | 16 | MN |
| 15712 | CCVC 15-National | 1548 | 25-17 | 60% | 15 | AL |
| 15713 | Elevate 14-Kirstin | 1548 | 19-13 | 59% | 14 | SC |
| 15714 | Empowered 15-Elite red | 1548 | 31-19 | 62% | 15 | IN |
| 15715 | Lakas 16 Power | 1548 | 21-17 | 55% | 16 | CA |
| 15716 | Metro 13-Black | 1548 | 18-15 | 55% | 13 | GA |
| 15717 | Wrecking Crew 14-P | 1548 | 8-10 | 42% | 14 | TX |
| 15718 | OKI VC 14-1 | 1548 | 10-5 | 67% | 14 | NC |
| 15719 | HOP Rebels 12 Gold | 1548 | 14-12 | 54% | 12 | WA |
| 15720 | Central Elite 17-2 | 1548 | 12-1 | 80% | 17 | MO |
| 15721 | Grandlake 18-Marbaugh | 1548 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | OH |
| 15722 | Angelo Rise 15-S black | 1548 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 15723 | Club V 14-Keleni | 1548 | 18-11 | 55% | 14 | UT |
| 15724 | Empowered 15-Elite onyx | 1548 | 29-25 | 54% | 15 | IN |
| 15725 | Rival 18-Black | 1548 | 20-22 | 48% | 18 | NY |
| 15726 | Charged Up 17 Royal | 1548 | 19-16 | 54% | 17 | MI |
| 15727 | SKC 13-Black | 1548 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | KS |
| 15728 | Cobra 12-Black | 1548 | 9-10 | 47% | 12 | MA |
| 15729 | WTM 13-1 | 1548 | 13-12 | 52% | 13 | TX |
| 15730 | Spokane Ignite 13 U13 Ignite Black (EV) | 1548 | 7-7 | 50% | 13 | |
| 15731 | Anamosa 13-S | 1548 | 2-2 | 50% | 13 | IA |
| 15732 | Skyline 12-White iv/adrian | 1548 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | TX |
| 15733 | SIVBA 12-Turquoise | 1548 | 9-6 | 50% | 12 | MO |
| 15734 | Metro Volleyball Club 15-Central | 1548 | 23-16 | 53% | 15 | DC |
| 15735 | Air VBC 15-Blue | 1548 | 15-13 | 54% | 15 | WI |
| 15736 | Lineshot 15-Purple | 1548 | 17-9 | 65% | 15 | OH |
| 15737 | SRVC Tide 13 | 1548 | 25-14 | 63% | 13 | MD |
| 15738 | CPVC 17-Black | 1548 | 32-15 | 68% | 17 | NC |
| 15739 | Aftershock 14-Jaime | 1548 | 22-13 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 15740 | TOVC Cesar 17 | 1548 | 7-3 | 70% | 17 | PR |
| 15741 | M2 Volleyball 15-N1 | 1548 | 33-21 | 61% | 15 | GA |
| 15742 | Sportime 13-Gold | 1548 | 16-26 | 38% | 13 | NY |
| 15743 | Reign 14-S | 1548 | 26-16 | 62% | 14 | TX |
| 15744 | OP2 12-4 select | 1548 | 3-1 | 60% | 12 | |
| 15745 | Junior Bison Volleyball Club 14-Gold | 1548 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | |
| 15746 | Integrity 17-Intense red | 1548 | 18-18 | 45% | 17 | PA |
| 15747 | SOSVBC 17-N artem | 1548 | 8-10 | 44% | 17 | NY |
| 15748 | WENTZVILLE HEAT 15-1 navy | 1548 | 26-15 | 59% | 15 | MO |
| 15749 | Hawks VBC 15-1 | 1548 | 14-7 | 67% | 15 | OH |
| 15750 | Houston Hazard 14-White | 1548 | 15-10 | 58% | 14 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.