Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 314 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15651 AVB Fire 13-Black 1549 5-1 83% 13 MN
15652 Renegades 10-National 1549 4-4 50% 10 TX
15653 1915 Excel VC 15-1 1549 3-0 100% 15 FL
15654 STVA 10 Navy 1549 13-11 48% 10 TX
15655 ACCEL 15-Black powell 1549 21-24 45% 15 TX
15656 PVA 13-1 1549 16-14 53% 13 SC
15657 Chill Volleyball Club 14-Cormier 1549 5-3 63% 14
15658 Erie Elite Ana 14 1549 13-6 68% 14 OH
15659 Ignite 13 Premier (SC) 1549 25-23 52% 13 CA
15660 TC ELITE 18-K 1549 2-1 67% 18 LA
15661 Blue 12-1 1549 18-12 60% 12 MI
15662 SUVA 16-1 1549 3-1 75% 16 OH
15663 TVA 11-1 1549 6-5 55% 11 FL
15664 HJV 13-National 1549 18-17 51% 13 TX
15665 AVC 11-Blue 1549 3-2 60% 11 NE
15666 A5 10-3 1549 4-1 80% 10 GA
15667 Podio 14-1 1549 5-2 71% 14 CA
15668 Lassen 18-2 1549 2-0 100% 18 NV
15669 Copper State 16-1 1549 20-12 63% 16 AZ
15670 Spa City 16-Coral 1549 25-24 51% 16 NY
15671 949 G15-White 1549 28-35 44% 15 CA
15672 Mizuno Northern Lights 18-B 1549 17-20 46% 18 MN
15673 BVA 13-N jenna 1549 42-34 55% 13 FL
15674 Rev 12-1 pistons 1549 24-27 47% 12 IN
15675 OK Elite 14 Gold 1549 15-7 65% 14 OK
15676 Metro Volleyball Club 13-North 1549 26-20 54% 13 DC
15677 Rancho Valley 12-Premier 1549 24-22 52% 12 CA
15678 ESO 17 Prime 1549 15-13 54% 17 OH
15679 CALI 17-Red 1549 33-15 69% 17 NY
15680 HPVBC Teal Storm 14U 1549 50-24 68% 14 TX
15681 FTL 15-Fusion usa libertya 1549 3-1 75% 15 FL
15682 Wink Lady Cats 15 1549 10-8 56% 15 TX
15683 Networks Acad 15-2 1549 5-2 56% 15 AL
15684 Shockwave VB Academy 12-1 1549 7-3 54% 12 KS
15685 BVA 17-1 1549 23-29 44% 17 NC
15686 East TX Jrs 16-Mavs 1549 13-9 52% 16
15687 417 Juniors 17-2 1549 4-3 57% 17 MO
15688 BCS Skyline H 13-Black 1549 12-13 48% 13 TX
15689 Lineshot 15-Pink american 1549 8-5 62% 15 OH
15690 Dynamite 13-Premier 1549 22-17 56% 13 MI
15691 Elevate 13-Arctic aces 1549 22-19 54% 13 WI
15692 East Texas 12-Black 1548 6-3 67% 12 LA
15693 Starlings Tucson 14-White 1548 4-2 67% 14 CA
15694 Rival 18-Black 1548 20-22 48% 18 NY
15695 Junior Bison Volleyball Club 14-Gold 1548 6-3 67% 14
15696 OP2 12-4 select 1548 3-1 60% 12
15697 Wrecking Crew 14-P 1548 8-10 42% 14 TX
15698 Lineshot 15-Purple 1548 17-9 65% 15 OH
15699 OKI VC 14-1 1548 10-5 67% 14 NC
15700 Metro 13-Black 1548 18-15 55% 13 GA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.