2025-2026 Season — Page 306 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15251 | IVC 15 | 1553 | 1-0 | 33% | 15 | ND |
| 15252 | CCC - Hawks 14 | 1553 | 5-11 | 31% | 14 | MN |
| 15253 | Crossfire 14-Violet | 1553 | 6-4 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 15254 | antvb 14-1 | 1553 | 16-13 | 55% | 14 | IL |
| 15255 | SUSA 12-Navy | 1553 | 3-0 | 60% | 12 | UT |
| 15256 | Jax Skyline 12-Black | 1553 | 29-25 | 54% | 12 | FL |
| 15257 | Grandlake 13-Lutz | 1553 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | OH |
| 15258 | Nebraska ONE 10-Crush | 1553 | 3-1 | 75% | 10 | NE |
| 15259 | Cheetah West 12 | 1553 | 5-3 | 56% | 12 | NY |
| 15260 | TriState Crusaders 13-1 | 1553 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | NE |
| 15261 | Four1Nine Xtreme 14 14-Kintner (OV) | 1553 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | OH |
| 15262 | The 606 10-Blue | 1553 | 8-5 | 62% | 10 | IL |
| 15263 | SLAM 15-Black | 1553 | 25-21 | 51% | 15 | TX |
| 15264 | RISE Gold 17 | 1553 | 4-2 | 57% | 17 | UT |
| 15265 | South Shore Slam 18-Lime | 1553 | 7-8 | 47% | 18 | WI |
| 15266 | iSPIKE 18-1 | 1553 | 12-11 | 52% | 18 | OR |
| 15267 | CORE Girls 15-Titanium | 1553 | 10-10 | 50% | 15 | NJ |
| 15268 | City 14-1 | 1553 | 14-12 | 52% | 14 | NY |
| 15269 | Stars 16 Philip | 1553 | 47-29 | 62% | 16 | SC |
| 15270 | FLASH 14-2 gold | 1553 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | OH |
| 15271 | OT 13-O christian | 1553 | 23-21 | 52% | 13 | FL |
| 15272 | NCVC 16-Rush - black | 1553 | 13-11 | 46% | 16 | NY |
| 15273 | Paradise Hitters 15 | 1553 | 8-4 | 67% | 15 | MA |
| 15274 | Xtreme 15-National kelly | 1553 | 12-8 | 60% | 15 | NJ |
| 15275 | Alexandria Volleyball Club, MN 15-2 | 1553 | 14-15 | 48% | 15 | MN |
| 15276 | Lions Cityside 12-3 | 1553 | 10-13 | 43% | 12 | IL |
| 15277 | AR SELECT 13-Ntl | 1553 | 28-19 | 60% | 13 | AR |
| 15278 | Spokane Ignite 15-Ignition | 1553 | 4-1 | 50% | 15 | |
| 15279 | Spire VC 17 Daywalt | 1553 | 46-21 | 69% | 17 | OH |
| 15280 | FCA Force 16-1 savannah | 1553 | 11-7 | 61% | 16 | NC |
| 15281 | Jennings County Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1553 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | IN |
| 15282 | TORCH 14-Julia | 1553 | 24-17 | 59% | 14 | CA |
| 15283 | 3s Up VBA 15-1 | 1553 | 23-23 | 50% | 15 | SC |
| 15284 | Brookings 12-Black | 1553 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | SD |
| 15285 | Tampa North 14-Orange | 1553 | 25-12 | 68% | 14 | FL |
| 15286 | MVP 15-Elite | 1553 | 30-26 | 53% | 15 | TX |
| 15287 | Pride Volleyball Club 16 16s Brandi (BY) | 1553 | 2-1 | 50% | 16 | LA |
| 15288 | 501 Volley 12-4 regional | 1553 | 19-12 | 61% | 12 | AR |
| 15289 | Colorado Skyline 15 Royal | 1553 | 26-33 | 44% | 15 | CO |
| 15290 | MAVS KC 15-4 | 1553 | 6-5 | 38% | 15 | KS |
| 15291 | ForceVC 13-4 | 1553 | 9-5 | 64% | 13 | OH |
| 15292 | KNIGHTS 15 | 1553 | 2-2 | 50% | 15 | IA |
| 15293 | FCE 13-2 | 1553 | 7-8 | 47% | 13 | FL |
| 15294 | THNDR 16-1 | 1553 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | OH |
| 15295 | South KC Juniors 18-1 | 1553 | 8-7 | 47% | 18 | KS |
| 15296 | SEC Elite 13-S - williams | 1553 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | CO |
| 15297 | spc volleyball 10-1 | 1553 | 11-4 | 73% | 10 | FL |
| 15298 | ATTACK 14-1 | 1553 | 5-2 | 50% | 14 | ND |
| 15299 | Legacy Volleyball Club 15-Onika | 1553 | 4-5 | 44% | 15 | NY |
| 15300 | KOKUA 18 | 1552 | 27-26 | 51% | 18 | WA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.