Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 307 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15301 Grandlake 14-Hays 1552 3-2 60% 14 OH
15302 NEVBC 18-National 1552 20-15 57% 18 CO
15303 SWVBC 18 1552 24-13 65% 18 WI
15304 Top Select 11-Top 1552 37-32 54% 11 FL
15305 NE D-League 12 1552 5-5 50% 12 IA
15306 New Heights 17-1 (RM) 1552 13-13 50% 17 WY
15307 GP 14-Local black 1552 37-18 67% 14 FL
15308 RRIV 14 Regional 1552 16-13 48% 14 ND
15309 EC IMPACT 14 1552 15-10 58% 14 TX
15310 JNVBC 13 Teal 1552 9-8 47% 13 IA
15311 Vital 17-Jordin 1552 4-5 44% 17 MI
15312 Happy Volley 15 Thunder 1552 24-19 56% 15 PA
15313 IGNITE 16-Blue national 1552 25-21 54% 16 OH
15314 South Central NE 12-Red 1552 3-2 60% 12 NE
15315 IconVBC 14-Elite trinidad 1552 12-8 60% 14 CA
15316 LMVC 13-Nat lane 1552 23-20 53% 13 SC
15317 C1VB 14-Elite grvl 1552 24-16 60% 14 SC
15318 Sherwood Synergy 14-Green 1552 6-3 67% 14 AR
15319 Platinum 13-Apex 1552 14-26 35% 13 UT
15320 Central Oregon COVC 18-Nationals 1552 3-1 75% 18 NV
15321 Ultimate G11 Gold 1552 30-16 65% 11 IL
15322 Krush VBC 12-National 1552 25-26 49% 12 MI
15323 Vision 15-Exv white 1552 26-17 58% 15 TX
15324 Hanover VC 15-1 1552 22-17 56% 15 PA
15325 EASTSIDE ICE VOLLEYBALL CLUB 16 Eastside Ice Tundra 1552 25-20 53% 16 NY
15326 Golden Bear 14-Blue 1552 34-21 62% 14 CA
15327 Starlings Cudahy 17-S burgundy 1552 17-4 81% 17 CA
15328 Princeton 15-1 1552 9-8 53% 15 MN
15329 shockwave reading 14-1 1552 15-8 65% 14 PA
15330 WAVE ALLIANCE 16 PRO 1552 33-20 62% 16 FL
15331 TX SPARKS 13-2 alex 1552 17-11 57% 13 TX
15332 TNT 13 Taz 1552 33-28 54% 13 PA
15333 Balboa Bay 15-Red 1552 26-16 62% 15 CA
15334 MJVA 14-2 1552 2-6 25% 14 TN
15335 ECVC 14-White 1552 17-18 49% 14 VA
15336 Fusion 14-White 1552 21-22 49% 14 PA
15337 CMASS EDGE 14-Black 1552 17-43 28% 14 MA
15338 TW Skyline 14-White 1552 12-12 50% 14 TX
15339 FRVBC 14-Red 1552 21-17 55% 14 CO
15340 Acceleration Volleyball 18 AVB Fire 17/18's 1552 19-11 61% 18 MN
15341 Delaware Juniors 18-Ace 1552 16-13 55% 18 PA
15342 Synergy 14 Blast 1552 32-22 59% 14 PA
15343 Altitude 16-Red 1552 33-22 60% 16 AZ
15344 Desert Sports 17-National 1552 17-23 43% 17 CA
15345 High Desert 18-Chris 1552 5-2 71% 18 CA
15346 MVP Club 13-1 1552 3-1 75% 13 WI
15347 ATHENAVB 14-Black national 1552 2-6 25% 14 MN
15348 Bluff Impact 14 Royal 1552 7-4 50% 14 MO
15349 SA Magic 13-Elite 1552 21-29 42% 13 TX
15350 Rise Elite VC 12-Ashley 1552 13-9 59% 12 FL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.