Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 305 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15201 Kids America 13-Barnett 1554 10-6 63% 13 OH
15202 Miami United 15-Jenna 1554 3-2 60% 15 FL
15203 Grandlake 15-Cook 1554 6-4 60% 15 OH
15204 BAJA 15-Black 1554 6-5 55% 15 MX
15205 Wichita Legacy 15-2 1554 11-2 79% 15 KS
15206 Black Hills Juniors NH 15-1 1554 6-10 38% 15 WY
15207 NT 15-Windermere 1554 43-26 62% 15 FL
15208 East Texas 13-Mavs 1554 12-9 44% 13 LA
15209 540 VB 16 National 1554 31-32 49% 16 VA
15210 SoCal VBC 15-Grandview 1554 20-25 44% 15 CA
15211 Katy Volleyball 15-Blue 1554 22-13 58% 15 TX
15212 Express 13 1554 4-1 50% 13 IA
15213 Border West 16 1554 10-6 59% 16 MN
15214 AVC CLE 11-Red 1554 25-21 54% 11 OH
15215 Aleta 13-2 1554 3-2 60% 13 OH
15216 Jays 12-Blue 1554 3-1 75% 12 ND
15217 OCJ 18-White 1553 16-5 70% 18 OR
15218 Synergy 14-Maag 1553 4-1 80% 14 OH
15219 IVC 17U Elite 1553 31-16 65% 17 ND
15220 Ohana 17-Regional 1553 10-6 63% 17 IA
15221 TPV 13-Yankee 1553 33-34 49% 13 TN
15222 LTX SELECT 12-Blue 1553 16-10 62% 12 TX
15223 CPVC 14-Taylor 1553 4-2 67% 14 CA
15224 AFVBC 18 Everest 1553 29-25 54% 18 CA
15225 CV Starlings 12-Brandi 1553 4-3 57% 12 CA
15226 East Texas 17-B 1553 10-9 48% 17 LA
15227 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 15-1 1553 3-3 43% 15 MO
15228 Ohana 16-Girls national 1553 3-3 50% 16 IA
15229 L2 17-3 1553 35-30 54% 17 MI
15230 HEAT 17-Travel jennifer 1553 16-15 52% 17 CA
15231 Downstate 16-White 1553 17-18 49% 16 NY
15232 Roots 16-3 maple 1553 22-23 49% 16 TX
15233 ACT 13-Celeste 1553 19-15 56% 13 CA
15234 Mindset Premier 13-Black 1553 43-31 57% 13 IL
15235 STL Crossfire 12-Sr3 1553 21-20 51% 12 MO
15236 Rockwood 10-Silver 1553 3-1 75% 10 MO
15237 Shawano Storm 14-Black 1553 6-4 60% 14 WI
15238 PVA 12-Regional aspen 1553 14-10 58% 12 NY
15239 Empire Volleyball Club 14 U14 Empire Black (NO) 1553 12-10 46% 14
15240 clubSAV 12-Local white 1553 7-7 50% 12 GA
15241 Delano 12-2 1553 4-3 50% 12 MN
15242 Empire Volleyball Club 16 U16 Empire Black (NO) 1553 19-11 58% 16
15243 Advitl 13-Tania 1553 9-3 75% 13 PR
15244 SIVBC 18 Wave 1553 26-26 50% 18 WA
15245 575 15-Pcnb brandon 1553 36-27 57% 15 GA
15246 Junior Bisons 14-Brown 1553 3-1 75% 14 KY
15247 PC Elite 15 1553 16-12 50% 15 TX
15248 North Point 16-V 1553 12-10 55% 16 TX
15249 FCE 13-2 1553 7-8 47% 13 FL
15250 Show 16-Jamison 1553 12-17 41% 16 ID
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.