2025-2026 Season — Page 304 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15151 | I AM VBC 10-RED | 1554 | 24-14 | 63% | 10 | WI |
| 15152 | SGJO 12-1 | 1554 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | MN |
| 15153 | SW Fusion 14-Gold | 1554 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | MN |
| 15154 | Texas Diamonds 15-Black | 1554 | 22-15 | 58% | 15 | TX |
| 15155 | AVB Fire 16-2 | 1554 | 20-15 | 57% | 16 | MN |
| 15156 | Vertex 16-S | 1554 | 5-2 | 71% | 16 | TX |
| 15157 | Cedar Elite 14 | 1554 | 3-1 | 60% | 14 | NE |
| 15158 | FCVBC 14-Black | 1554 | 3-1 | 43% | 14 | CO |
| 15159 | Club Apex 17-Grey | 1554 | 29-18 | 62% | 17 | KY |
| 15160 | UEPA 15-Gold | 1554 | 2-1 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 15161 | TVC 12-Black | 1554 | 16-21 | 43% | 12 | OH |
| 15162 | SOMD 18-Black | 1554 | 18-9 | 67% | 18 | MD |
| 15163 | Rockland 14-Stars | 1554 | 13-11 | 54% | 14 | NJ |
| 15164 | Club Serve G14-1 | 1554 | 9-6 | 56% | 14 | MO |
| 15165 | Cool City Select 16-S | 1554 | 19-9 | 68% | 16 | WI |
| 15166 | JVB 12-White | 1554 | 8-4 | 67% | 12 | MN |
| 15167 | Premier 13 Spree | 1554 | 27-25 | 52% | 13 | OH |
| 15168 | Momentum 10-Black | 1554 | 18-12 | 60% | 10 | FL |
| 15169 | Club SyrV 12-Explosion | 1554 | 16-10 | 52% | 12 | NY |
| 15170 | NYCLBVC 13-White | 1554 | 20-14 | 59% | 13 | NJ |
| 15171 | Ignite VBCF 16-Premier | 1554 | 4-4 | 50% | 16 | NV |
| 15172 | Elite Volleyball Clubs 15-2 | 1554 | 3-4 | 27% | 15 | KY |
| 15173 | Garrett United 16-1 | 1554 | 15-14 | 52% | 16 | OH |
| 15174 | Galena Choas 13 | 1554 | 2-0 | 50% | 13 | IA |
| 15175 | SEAVC 17-Black | 1554 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | MT |
| 15176 | NYC Volley Verse 16-Gold | 1554 | 22-15 | 59% | 16 | NY |
| 15177 | Metro Volleyball Club 16-South pw | 1554 | 33-18 | 62% | 16 | DC |
| 15178 | NPJ Portland 14-Black | 1554 | 29-31 | 48% | 14 | OR |
| 15179 | CVT Phoenix 15-Black | 1554 | 4-1 | 80% | 15 | NY |
| 15180 | Empire 13-1 | 1554 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | KS |
| 15181 | Zero Gravity 16-Gray | 1554 | 10-5 | 67% | 16 | OH |
| 15182 | SA Force 15-2 national | 1554 | 5-4 | 56% | 15 | NV |
| 15183 | BAJA 15-Black | 1554 | 6-5 | 55% | 15 | MX |
| 15184 | Minneota 13 | 1554 | 2-1 | 50% | 13 | MN |
| 15185 | Criollas 13-2 | 1554 | 5-1 | 83% | 13 | PR |
| 15186 | SA Elite 12-3 gold | 1554 | 7-2 | 78% | 12 | TX |
| 15187 | Lakeshore Storm 12-Blue | 1554 | 12-7 | 63% | 12 | WI |
| 15188 | Capital Ice 14 | 1554 | 26-31 | 46% | 14 | WA |
| 15189 | Red Rock 17-Mikey - walnut creek | 1554 | 26-25 | 51% | 17 | CA |
| 15190 | East Texas 18-B | 1554 | 5-5 | 45% | 18 | LA |
| 15191 | Roots 15 | 1554 | 3-2 | 60% | 15 | TX |
| 15192 | Charged Up 18 Royal | 1554 | 12-11 | 52% | 18 | MI |
| 15193 | TX Legends 16 Cobalt | 1554 | 13-9 | 50% | 16 | TX |
| 15194 | Next Rev VB 16-Silver | 1554 | 30-20 | 60% | 16 | VA |
| 15195 | E381 SLOGA 14-1 | 1554 | 4-2 | 67% | 14 | NY |
| 15196 | Juggernaut 15-National2 | 1554 | 30-29 | 51% | 15 | CO |
| 15197 | 360 Volleyball Club 15 15 Kaos Red | 1554 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | TX |
| 15198 | Thunderbolt 15-Gold | 1554 | 28-20 | 56% | 15 | MO |
| 15199 | LIV Volleyball Club 13-Black stella | 1554 | 14-10 | 58% | 13 | CA |
| 15200 | Kids America 13-Barnett | 1554 | 10-6 | 63% | 13 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.