2025-2026 Season — Page 301 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15001 | NHouston Elite 14-Premier | 1556 | 16-19 | 46% | 14 | TX |
| 15002 | Merrimack Valley Volleyball Club United 15 ValleyVBC Elite | 1556 | 17-5 | 77% | 15 | MA |
| 15003 | CCVC 14 | 1556 | 8-10 | 42% | 14 | WY |
| 15004 | HDVC 14-Amanda | 1556 | 21-9 | 70% | 14 | TN |
| 15005 | Ethos 14-Elite - allyson | 1556 | 32-30 | 52% | 14 | TN |
| 15006 | Pursuit 14 Elite | 1556 | 28-19 | 58% | 14 | MO |
| 15007 | Aura 14 | 1556 | 18-9 | 67% | 14 | CA |
| 15008 | Victory 17-Nat'l green | 1556 | 3-1 | 60% | 17 | TX |
| 15009 | Nova 15-Purple | 1556 | 33-23 | 59% | 15 | AZ |
| 15010 | Premier Volleyball 13-Premier 2 | 1556 | 3-1 | 75% | 13 | DE |
| 15011 | TX Evolution 16-Red | 1556 | 22-18 | 55% | 16 | TX |
| 15012 | SC Legends 13-Gold | 1556 | 21-13 | 62% | 13 | CA |
| 15013 | United Sports Academies 16 Brasil SV - Time Day Tozzi | 1556 | 7-2 | 78% | 16 | |
| 15014 | DVC 12-Purple | 1556 | 5-4 | 56% | 12 | OH |
| 15015 | C1VB In-house MS 14-Bailey | 1556 | 2-0 | 50% | 14 | SC |
| 15016 | Citadins 17-White | 1556 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | CT |
| 15017 | Prodigy 12-White | 1556 | 24-18 | 57% | 12 | KY |
| 15018 | PRVC 14-Taylor | 1556 | 11-9 | 55% | 14 | WY |
| 15019 | Inferno 11 Firestorm | 1556 | 14-6 | 70% | 11 | IL |
| 15020 | HI Bred VBC 13-Pink wahine | 1556 | 8-3 | 73% | 13 | HI |
| 15021 | SNVF 16 RAIN | 1556 | 25-29 | 46% | 16 | WA |
| 15022 | NSVBC 17-Select black | 1556 | 25-20 | 56% | 17 | WI |
| 15023 | 501 Volley 17-2 national | 1556 | 34-28 | 55% | 17 | AR |
| 15024 | RockCity 18-N2 | 1556 | 28-21 | 57% | 18 | OH |
| 15025 | Idaho ONE 12-Im alden | 1556 | 21-31 | 39% | 12 | ID |
| 15026 | YYC Eagles 15-Girls blue | 1556 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | |
| 15027 | Lincoln Fusion 11-Lora | 1556 | 11-10 | 52% | 11 | IL |
| 15028 | ASHOK 14-1 | 1556 | 34-24 | 59% | 14 | GA |
| 15029 | MSVC 18-Adidas reid | 1556 | 26-20 | 57% | 18 | FL |
| 15030 | Connect Volleyball 15-1 | 1556 | 35-23 | 60% | 15 | GA |
| 15031 | PVA 14 MOLTEN | 1556 | 14-14 | 50% | 14 | MO |
| 15032 | CJV 14-National white | 1556 | 24-38 | 39% | 14 | NC |
| 15033 | WSRVC 14-Schneider | 1556 | 26-20 | 57% | 14 | WY |
| 15034 | JCVC 11-1 | 1556 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | IN |
| 15035 | Dynamite 17-Premier | 1556 | 25-12 | 68% | 17 | MI |
| 15036 | Club Serve 13-Navy | 1556 | 6-3 | 67% | 13 | MO |
| 15037 | Wildfire 14-Sarah | 1556 | 22-12 | 65% | 14 | FL |
| 15038 | OK Premier 15-Mel | 1556 | 26-16 | 60% | 15 | OK |
| 15039 | Mach 6 16-1 | 1556 | 43-23 | 65% | 16 | IN |
| 15040 | NE Velo 16-1s | 1556 | 18-11 | 62% | 16 | MN |
| 15041 | Aftershock 15-Dave | 1556 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 15042 | TEVC 17-Black | 1556 | 25-22 | 53% | 17 | TN |
| 15043 | Cornwall 17-S | 1556 | 5-2 | 71% | 17 | NY |
| 15044 | Avoli 15-F carly | 1556 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | PR |
| 15045 | LOSO 12-1 mak | 1556 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | OH |
| 15046 | BoCo VAC 15-Black | 1556 | 10-4 | 71% | 15 | CO |
| 15047 | UVA 14-Fremont | 1556 | 4-4 | 50% | 14 | CA |
| 15048 | SPVB 14-White | 1556 | 42-43 | 49% | 14 | IL |
| 15049 | COAST 16-R1 jack | 1556 | 16-11 | 59% | 16 | CA |
| 15050 | Central VBC 14-Gold | 1556 | 6-3 | 67% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.