Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 301 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15001 NHouston Elite 14-Premier 1556 16-19 46% 14 TX
15002 Merrimack Valley Volleyball Club United 15 ValleyVBC Elite 1556 17-5 77% 15 MA
15003 CCVC 14 1556 8-10 42% 14 WY
15004 HDVC 14-Amanda 1556 21-9 70% 14 TN
15005 Ethos 14-Elite - allyson 1556 32-30 52% 14 TN
15006 Pursuit 14 Elite 1556 28-19 58% 14 MO
15007 Aura 14 1556 18-9 67% 14 CA
15008 Victory 17-Nat'l green 1556 3-1 60% 17 TX
15009 Nova 15-Purple 1556 33-23 59% 15 AZ
15010 Premier Volleyball 13-Premier 2 1556 3-1 75% 13 DE
15011 TX Evolution 16-Red 1556 22-18 55% 16 TX
15012 SC Legends 13-Gold 1556 21-13 62% 13 CA
15013 United Sports Academies 16 Brasil SV - Time Day Tozzi 1556 7-2 78% 16
15014 DVC 12-Purple 1556 5-4 56% 12 OH
15015 C1VB In-house MS 14-Bailey 1556 2-0 50% 14 SC
15016 Citadins 17-White 1556 3-2 60% 17 CT
15017 Prodigy 12-White 1556 24-18 57% 12 KY
15018 PRVC 14-Taylor 1556 11-9 55% 14 WY
15019 Inferno 11 Firestorm 1556 14-6 70% 11 IL
15020 HI Bred VBC 13-Pink wahine 1556 8-3 73% 13 HI
15021 SNVF 16 RAIN 1556 25-29 46% 16 WA
15022 NSVBC 17-Select black 1556 25-20 56% 17 WI
15023 501 Volley 17-2 national 1556 34-28 55% 17 AR
15024 RockCity 18-N2 1556 28-21 57% 18 OH
15025 Idaho ONE 12-Im alden 1556 21-31 39% 12 ID
15026 YYC Eagles 15-Girls blue 1556 4-3 57% 15
15027 Lincoln Fusion 11-Lora 1556 11-10 52% 11 IL
15028 ASHOK 14-1 1556 34-24 59% 14 GA
15029 MSVC 18-Adidas reid 1556 26-20 57% 18 FL
15030 Connect Volleyball 15-1 1556 35-23 60% 15 GA
15031 PVA 14 MOLTEN 1556 14-14 50% 14 MO
15032 CJV 14-National white 1556 24-38 39% 14 NC
15033 WSRVC 14-Schneider 1556 26-20 57% 14 WY
15034 JCVC 11-1 1556 4-1 80% 11 IN
15035 Dynamite 17-Premier 1556 25-12 68% 17 MI
15036 Club Serve 13-Navy 1556 6-3 67% 13 MO
15037 Wildfire 14-Sarah 1556 22-12 65% 14 FL
15038 OK Premier 15-Mel 1556 26-16 60% 15 OK
15039 Mach 6 16-1 1556 43-23 65% 16 IN
15040 NE Velo 16-1s 1556 18-11 62% 16 MN
15041 Aftershock 15-Dave 1556 5-3 63% 15 CA
15042 TEVC 17-Black 1556 25-22 53% 17 TN
15043 Cornwall 17-S 1556 5-2 71% 17 NY
15044 Avoli 15-F carly 1556 5-2 71% 15 PR
15045 LOSO 12-1 mak 1556 3-2 60% 12 OH
15046 BoCo VAC 15-Black 1556 10-4 71% 15 CO
15047 UVA 14-Fremont 1556 4-4 50% 14 CA
15048 SPVB 14-White 1556 42-43 49% 14 IL
15049 COAST 16-R1 jack 1556 16-11 59% 16 CA
15050 Central VBC 14-Gold 1556 6-3 67% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.