Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 302 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
15051 CLUB UNION CLUB UNION 12-Blue 1556 3-0 100% 12 UT
15052 LAVA Islands 14-Molten 1556 14-20 41% 14 CA
15053 SouthJamm 15-Black 1556 10-5 56% 15 AL
15054 MSSVC 14-Lightning 1556 4-3 57% 14 WV
15055 Voltage 15-Black - eunice 1556 26-24 52% 15 FL
15056 TX Premier 12-Club 1556 18-10 58% 12 TX
15057 Five Star 16-Black 1556 31-38 45% 16 CO
15058 NIVA 16 JADE 1556 22-15 59% 16 IN
15059 Premier 16-Royal 1556 6-4 60% 16 PA
15060 575 15-Danielle ws 1556 5-3 63% 15 GA
15061 Black Canyon 15-S paige 1556 14-9 58% 15 CO
15062 MoCo Jrs 15 Adidas 1556 31-21 57% 15 TX
15063 Oxygen 15-White 1556 6-3 67% 15 NJ
15064 Rush City Digz 15 1556 8-2 80% 15 WI
15065 ASVC 15-N1e 1556 47-37 56% 15 AZ
15066 NL 15-Onyx 1556 28-15 65% 15 MI
15067 Allons 18 1555 13-8 62% 18 LA
15068 Endless Momentum 17-Power blue 1555 5-3 63% 17 MA
15069 Pacific 17-2 1555 5-3 63% 17 WA
15070 OWV 13-PURPLE 1555 30-19 61% 13 FL
15071 Fusion 13-Hailee 1555 9-10 41% 13 UT
15072 SUSA 16-1 1555 15-17 47% 16 UT
15073 Corozal TIV 16-1 anthony 1555 6-4 60% 16 PR
15074 Rose City 16-1 1555 8-5 62% 16 MI
15075 One Ohana 14-Adidas 1555 24-17 59% 14 WA
15076 Aspire 15-Black 1555 24-31 44% 15 AZ
15077 Premier Volleyball 17 Premier Flare 1555 9-10 47% 17 DE
15078 Mavericks 15-1 1555 5-4 56% 15 FL
15079 Mo Mighty Piranhas 13-1 1555 7-1 88% 13 MO
15080 Vail Peak 14U Pink 1555 29-18 62% 14 CO
15081 Yorktown 12 1555 10-9 53% 12 IN
15082 OCVC 12-Slunks 1555 25-19 57% 12 CA
15083 Cypress Huskies 11u 1555 20-10 67% 11 TX
15084 JVC 11-Black 1555 10-4 56% 11 IN
15085 Fresno Heat HEAT 18-National ryan 1555 3-4 43% 18 NV
15086 ForceVC 11-1 1555 17-25 40% 11 OH
15087 EliteZ 13-Girls hp black 1555 23-14 62% 13 NH
15088 603 United 18-Central white 1555 21-19 53% 18 NH
15089 CID WR 15-Blue 1555 20-14 59% 15 ID
15090 850 ELITE 12-1 1555 20-14 59% 12 AL
15091 Topeka Saints 11-2 1555 5-1 83% 11 KS
15092 BAVA 14-Protostega 1555 25-15 61% 14 TX
15093 NE Velo 11-2 1555 3-0 100% 11 MN
15094 HVA 13-Blue 1555 12-6 67% 13 TX
15095 OK Charge 14-Nat'l tulsa 1555 26-22 54% 14 OK
15096 CVBC 15-1 1555 13-17 38% 15 VA
15097 Boston United 15-Sky 1555 3-0 100% 15 MA
15098 NVA 14-Elite fernando 1555 30-23 57% 14 FL
15099 Synergy 16-Lithium 1555 32-26 55% 16 PA
15100 Charged Up 14-White 1555 11-4 73% 14 MI
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.