Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 300 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14951 Rockhill Blast 17 1557 10-7 59% 17 TX
14952 Samba 14 1557 16-10 62% 14 CA
14953 WJVC 15-1 1557 3-4 43% 15 TX
14954 Iowa Select 14-Ready 1557 4-1 80% 14 IA
14955 Prime Volleyball Club 12-Adidas 1557 18-19 49% 12 CA
14956 Dubuque Insanity 14-Grey 1557 3-1 75% 14 IA
14957 SBS 11U 1557 3-1 75% 11 TX
14958 TX LEGACY 14-Liberty 1557 24-17 56% 14 TX
14959 Rise Elite VC 15-Stephen 1557 45-24 65% 15 FL
14960 LAVA Mission 14-Premier 1557 22-14 61% 14 CA
14961 JJVA Club 16-D 1557 9-5 64% 16 FL
14962 Next Level 16-Alvin 1557 14-3 82% 16 MI
14963 MAVS KC 11 Premier 1557 8-12 40% 11 KS
14964 DJVBC 14-1 1557 8-5 62% 14 PA
14965 Club Cyclones Volleyball Arctic 14 1557 5-4 56% 14
14966 SCVBC 15-Semi-national 1557 7-3 70% 15 TN
14967 OVVC 16-North 1557 12-8 60% 16 OH
14968 Infinite Training Volleyball Club 14 ITVC 13'S 1557 17-7 71% 14 CA
14969 Bradenton Spartans 17 1557 15-10 60% 17 FL
14970 TPV 13-Red 1557 27-15 64% 13 TN
14971 218 Elite 16-S 1557 14-5 74% 16 MN
14972 FRST VOLLEYBALL 16-1 purple 1557 13-24 34% 16 TX
14973 CVT Phoenix 15-White 1557 4-1 80% 15 NY
14974 oe 15-2 1557 7-4 64% 15 OH
14975 Legit 12-G royal 1556 7-4 58% 12 IA
14976 Tempo Volleyball Club 14-1 1556 16-22 42% 14 WI
14977 Lunatics Volleyball Club 17 LVC Lunatics Tayler 1556 6-3 60% 17 UT
14978 Tsunami 13-1n maria 1556 12-6 67% 13 GA
14979 EVP Soar 14-1 1556 3-4 43% 14 FL
14980 Advantage 13 Teal 1556 18-16 53% 13 NC
14981 H2 14-1 longhorns_alex 1556 4-2 67% 14 MO
14982 Alta Sierra 14-S coach amy 1556 9-9 50% 14 CA
14983 Aleta 16-1 1556 21-23 48% 16 OH
14984 Rage 12-Wagner 1556 11-8 58% 12 CA
14985 Lakers 12-White 1556 3-2 60% 12 NY
14986 VC United 17-4 elite 1556 31-16 66% 17 IL
14987 Peninsula Wild 12 Peninsula Wild Frost 1556 7-5 50% 12 AK
14988 GCVC 12-Silver 1556 18-19 49% 12 OH
14989 HVVC 18-BLUE 1556 25-17 60% 18 MI
14990 GVG 15-Mito 1556 4-3 57% 15 PR
14991 WF Elite 15-White 1556 24-13 60% 15 TX
14992 Spiketown VBC 15-2 1556 6-3 67% 15 OH
14993 Top Flight 12-Gamma sp 1556 2-4 33% 12 IL
14994 HEVBA 13-1 1556 21-19 53% 13 MA
14995 DVC 13-Aileen 1556 5-1 83% 13 PR
14996 UVA 14-Local 1556 5-1 83% 14 LA
14997 Dyersville Intensity 12-Green 1556 2-0 40% 12 IA
14998 Avidity 15-Ruby 1556 18-23 44% 15 MA
14999 575 18-Can danielle 1556 22-16 58% 18 GA
15000 NHouston Elite 14-Premier 1556 16-19 46% 14 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.