Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 299 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14901 GSVC 14-Gold 1557 3-2 60% 14 NH
14902 904 Elite 14-Local 1557 6-8 43% 14 FL
14903 Arsenal 15-Gold 1557 20-22 44% 15 TX
14904 Buckeyefire 12 Vertock 1557 32-25 56% 12 OH
14905 High Impact 17-S 1557 11-4 73% 17 TX
14906 Forza 14-Orange 1557 52-24 68% 14 IL
14907 SERVE VBC 16-1 1557 19-17 53% 16 OH
14908 Chicago Elite 12-Pomegranate 1557 8-4 67% 12 IL
14909 iCrush 13-Black 1557 15-15 47% 13 TX
14910 Alamo 13-Gold 2 1557 26-24 50% 13 TX
14911 FC Flames 13 1557 7-4 64% 13 CO
14912 VVA 17-Ogas 1557 3-2 60% 17 CA
14913 Junior Jays 16 1557 10-9 53% 16 MN
14914 PVCGA 14-1 1557 25-17 58% 14 GA
14915 Heat 14-Red 1557 21-15 58% 14 WI
14916 Phoenix 14-Orange 1557 9-7 56% 14 OH
14917 CCVBC 14-Gina 1557 15-13 54% 14 CA
14918 OT 12-O leslee 1557 8-8 50% 12 FL
14919 Croix Attack 14-1 1557 10-7 53% 14 WI
14920 Bandits 16 1557 4-5 31% 16 AL
14921 AAVA 12-2 rain 1557 16-11 59% 12 OR
14922 Red Wing 12-Black 1557 5-2 71% 12 MN
14923 Sequoia Crush 18-Black 1557 16-12 57% 18 CA
14924 SFSVC 15-3 liz 1557 24-11 69% 15 NM
14925 BVA 18-1 1557 24-13 65% 18 NC
14926 Lassen 18-1 1557 2-0 100% 18 NV
14927 Victory 13-National green 1557 14-23 35% 13 TX
14928 MoCO MAVS 12-Cp 1557 2-1 67% 12 TX
14929 Mineral Area 14-Ladycats 1557 8-3 73% 14 MO
14930 SOVC Grigsby 14-A 1557 4-1 80% 14 OH
14931 KRATOS Volley Academy 16 Vixens 1557 29-18 62% 16 CT
14932 Rise 17-Purple 1557 34-30 53% 17 CO
14933 Stormbreaker 15 Nova 1557 23-17 57% 15 CA
14934 No Limits 13-Elite 1557 27-21 55% 13 TX
14935 EU 12-Platinum 1557 20-11 65% 12 IN
14936 A5 Chattanooga 13-1 1557 44-67 40% 13 GA
14937 Trinity 11-Blaze 1557 33-17 66% 11 FL
14938 Spiketown VBC 17-1 1557 18-9 67% 17 OH
14939 OCVBC 12 1557 3-1 60% 12 NE
14940 Arkansas Elite 11-2 1557 17-9 63% 11 AR
14941 Game Day 12-1 1557 15-13 52% 12 OR
14942 Carolina ICE 16-Nat 2 1557 29-23 56% 16 SC
14943 NPSC United Panthers 15-1 1557 40-24 61% 15 VA
14944 NorthShore 12-Axolotls 1557 22-15 59% 12 MI
14945 Zuma Bay 16 Surge 1557 25-18 58% 16 CA
14946 Crossroads 16 1557 13-11 54% 16 TX
14947 3CVBC 16 National 1557 25-22 53% 16 TX
14948 RPB 16-Bolt 1557 12-5 71% 16 FL
14949 Heat 16 ignite 1557 20-13 61% 16 WI
14950 NOVA Juniors 16-S maroon 1557 25-15 63% 16 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.