2025-2026 Season — Page 299 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14901 | GSVC 14-Gold | 1557 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | NH |
| 14902 | 904 Elite 14-Local | 1557 | 6-8 | 43% | 14 | FL |
| 14903 | Arsenal 15-Gold | 1557 | 20-22 | 44% | 15 | TX |
| 14904 | Buckeyefire 12 Vertock | 1557 | 32-25 | 56% | 12 | OH |
| 14905 | High Impact 17-S | 1557 | 11-4 | 73% | 17 | TX |
| 14906 | Forza 14-Orange | 1557 | 52-24 | 68% | 14 | IL |
| 14907 | SERVE VBC 16-1 | 1557 | 19-17 | 53% | 16 | OH |
| 14908 | Chicago Elite 12-Pomegranate | 1557 | 8-4 | 67% | 12 | IL |
| 14909 | iCrush 13-Black | 1557 | 15-15 | 47% | 13 | TX |
| 14910 | Alamo 13-Gold 2 | 1557 | 26-24 | 50% | 13 | TX |
| 14911 | FC Flames 13 | 1557 | 7-4 | 64% | 13 | CO |
| 14912 | VVA 17-Ogas | 1557 | 3-2 | 60% | 17 | CA |
| 14913 | Junior Jays 16 | 1557 | 10-9 | 53% | 16 | MN |
| 14914 | PVCGA 14-1 | 1557 | 25-17 | 58% | 14 | GA |
| 14915 | Heat 14-Red | 1557 | 21-15 | 58% | 14 | WI |
| 14916 | Phoenix 14-Orange | 1557 | 9-7 | 56% | 14 | OH |
| 14917 | CCVBC 14-Gina | 1557 | 15-13 | 54% | 14 | CA |
| 14918 | OT 12-O leslee | 1557 | 8-8 | 50% | 12 | FL |
| 14919 | Croix Attack 14-1 | 1557 | 10-7 | 53% | 14 | WI |
| 14920 | Bandits 16 | 1557 | 4-5 | 31% | 16 | AL |
| 14921 | AAVA 12-2 rain | 1557 | 16-11 | 59% | 12 | OR |
| 14922 | Red Wing 12-Black | 1557 | 5-2 | 71% | 12 | MN |
| 14923 | Sequoia Crush 18-Black | 1557 | 16-12 | 57% | 18 | CA |
| 14924 | SFSVC 15-3 liz | 1557 | 24-11 | 69% | 15 | NM |
| 14925 | BVA 18-1 | 1557 | 24-13 | 65% | 18 | NC |
| 14926 | Lassen 18-1 | 1557 | 2-0 | 100% | 18 | NV |
| 14927 | Victory 13-National green | 1557 | 14-23 | 35% | 13 | TX |
| 14928 | MoCO MAVS 12-Cp | 1557 | 2-1 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 14929 | Mineral Area 14-Ladycats | 1557 | 8-3 | 73% | 14 | MO |
| 14930 | SOVC Grigsby 14-A | 1557 | 4-1 | 80% | 14 | OH |
| 14931 | KRATOS Volley Academy 16 Vixens | 1557 | 29-18 | 62% | 16 | CT |
| 14932 | Rise 17-Purple | 1557 | 34-30 | 53% | 17 | CO |
| 14933 | Stormbreaker 15 Nova | 1557 | 23-17 | 57% | 15 | CA |
| 14934 | No Limits 13-Elite | 1557 | 27-21 | 55% | 13 | TX |
| 14935 | EU 12-Platinum | 1557 | 20-11 | 65% | 12 | IN |
| 14936 | A5 Chattanooga 13-1 | 1557 | 44-67 | 40% | 13 | GA |
| 14937 | Trinity 11-Blaze | 1557 | 33-17 | 66% | 11 | FL |
| 14938 | Spiketown VBC 17-1 | 1557 | 18-9 | 67% | 17 | OH |
| 14939 | OCVBC 12 | 1557 | 3-1 | 60% | 12 | NE |
| 14940 | Arkansas Elite 11-2 | 1557 | 17-9 | 63% | 11 | AR |
| 14941 | Game Day 12-1 | 1557 | 15-13 | 52% | 12 | OR |
| 14942 | Carolina ICE 16-Nat 2 | 1557 | 29-23 | 56% | 16 | SC |
| 14943 | NPSC United Panthers 15-1 | 1557 | 40-24 | 61% | 15 | VA |
| 14944 | NorthShore 12-Axolotls | 1557 | 22-15 | 59% | 12 | MI |
| 14945 | Zuma Bay 16 Surge | 1557 | 25-18 | 58% | 16 | CA |
| 14946 | Crossroads 16 | 1557 | 13-11 | 54% | 16 | TX |
| 14947 | 3CVBC 16 National | 1557 | 25-22 | 53% | 16 | TX |
| 14948 | RPB 16-Bolt | 1557 | 12-5 | 71% | 16 | FL |
| 14949 | Heat 16 ignite | 1557 | 20-13 | 61% | 16 | WI |
| 14950 | NOVA Juniors 16-S maroon | 1557 | 25-15 | 63% | 16 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.