2025-2026 Season — Page 298 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14851 | SMV 12-2 silver | 1558 | 23-19 | 53% | 12 | MN |
| 14852 | SEV Sporting Edge 16-Armour | 1558 | 5-4 | 56% | 16 | NV |
| 14853 | NPJ Salem 13 National | 1558 | 35-42 | 45% | 13 | OR |
| 14854 | North Fork 13-S | 1558 | 2-1 | 67% | 13 | CO |
| 14855 | VALLEY VENOM 11-1 | 1558 | 13-23 | 36% | 11 | TX |
| 14856 | Ark Volley 11-Regional | 1558 | 20-14 | 57% | 11 | AR |
| 14857 | DCVA 14-3 | 1558 | 3-2 | 38% | 14 | CO |
| 14858 | AVC Red 13-2 | 1558 | 7-4 | 54% | 13 | TX |
| 14859 | Aura 15 | 1558 | 17-9 | 65% | 15 | CA |
| 14860 | Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 15-Girls black | 1558 | 4-3 | 57% | 15 | |
| 14861 | BVA 13-R | 1558 | 20-12 | 63% | 13 | NC |
| 14862 | Vancouver Thunder Volleyball Club 14-White | 1558 | 5-4 | 56% | 14 | |
| 14863 | Dead Frog 15-Gold | 1558 | 14-11 | 56% | 15 | MI |
| 14864 | SEU 15-N | 1558 | 9-5 | 64% | 15 | FL |
| 14865 | Alamo 14-Gold 2 | 1558 | 33-23 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 14866 | Pipeline 16-Ultra jamie | 1558 | 26-23 | 53% | 16 | CA |
| 14867 | Elevation 11-Timberline | 1558 | 28-21 | 57% | 11 | CO |
| 14868 | Club Momentum 12-White | 1558 | 2-0 | 100% | 12 | MN |
| 14869 | Forward 15-Red | 1558 | 5-1 | 83% | 15 | FL |
| 14870 | Ridgetop VBC 18 | 1558 | 8-3 | 73% | 18 | PA |
| 14871 | Pride Volleyball Club 15 15s Adrienne (BY) | 1558 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | LA |
| 14872 | USA MI RunBird 16 | 1558 | 54-32 | 63% | 16 | MI |
| 14873 | Prime 16-Blue | 1558 | 18-9 | 67% | 16 | CA |
| 14874 | Club GSL 14-Elect - kevin | 1558 | 28-24 | 50% | 14 | UT |
| 14875 | Fusion 15 Power | 1558 | 5-2 | 45% | 15 | WI |
| 14876 | Champion 12-Z purple | 1558 | 15-13 | 52% | 12 | NC |
| 14877 | Legacy 14-Elite west | 1558 | 32-17 | 65% | 14 | MI |
| 14878 | Big Sky Volleyball Club 16 Big Sky 16-4-2 (EV) (7) | 1558 | 2-0 | 40% | 16 | MT |
| 14879 | COAST 15-R1 sophia | 1558 | 16-11 | 59% | 15 | CA |
| 14880 | 603 United 16-Central white | 1558 | 19-19 | 50% | 16 | NH |
| 14881 | Pillar 13-Purple | 1558 | 25-23 | 52% | 13 | OH |
| 14882 | MVI 13-Paula | 1558 | 5-3 | 56% | 13 | ID |
| 14883 | Uptime VB 12-1 | 1558 | 17-13 | 57% | 12 | TN |
| 14884 | G3 12-Elite chris | 1558 | 19-16 | 54% | 12 | MO |
| 14885 | War Eagle 15-1 voltage | 1558 | 17-13 | 57% | 15 | AZ |
| 14886 | Ultimate G12-Blue | 1558 | 19-13 | 59% | 12 | IL |
| 14887 | Spiketown VBC 12-2 | 1558 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | OH |
| 14888 | Pgh Elite 12-Gold | 1558 | 5-1 | 83% | 12 | PA |
| 14889 | LAVBC 11-Keiki | 1557 | 4-4 | 50% | 11 | HI |
| 14890 | Alliance 16-White | 1557 | 20-13 | 61% | 16 | CA |
| 14891 | BEVBC 12 Navy | 1557 | 20-19 | 51% | 12 | MD |
| 14892 | Panda 17-Black | 1557 | 19-12 | 61% | 17 | CA |
| 14893 | OK Charge 13 Select | 1557 | 19-13 | 59% | 13 | OK |
| 14894 | ZTV 14-4 silver | 1557 | 15-9 | 48% | 14 | MT |
| 14895 | TopFlight 16-National gr | 1557 | 6-17 | 26% | 16 | NV |
| 14896 | GSL JO 11-1 | 1557 | 2-1 | 67% | 11 | MN |
| 14897 | OYVBA 17-1 | 1557 | 8-5 | 62% | 17 | MN |
| 14898 | DVA UA 14 Elite | 1557 | 49-30 | 62% | 14 | IL |
| 14899 | NorthShore 16-Schafer | 1557 | 13-8 | 62% | 16 | OH |
| 14900 | GSVC 14-Gold | 1557 | 3-2 | 60% | 14 | NH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.