Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 298 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14851 SMV 12-2 silver 1558 23-19 53% 12 MN
14852 SEV Sporting Edge 16-Armour 1558 5-4 56% 16 NV
14853 NPJ Salem 13 National 1558 35-42 45% 13 OR
14854 North Fork 13-S 1558 2-1 67% 13 CO
14855 VALLEY VENOM 11-1 1558 13-23 36% 11 TX
14856 Ark Volley 11-Regional 1558 20-14 57% 11 AR
14857 DCVA 14-3 1558 3-2 38% 14 CO
14858 AVC Red 13-2 1558 7-4 54% 13 TX
14859 Aura 15 1558 17-9 65% 15 CA
14860 Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 15-Girls black 1558 4-3 57% 15
14861 BVA 13-R 1558 20-12 63% 13 NC
14862 Vancouver Thunder Volleyball Club 14-White 1558 5-4 56% 14
14863 Dead Frog 15-Gold 1558 14-11 56% 15 MI
14864 SEU 15-N 1558 9-5 64% 15 FL
14865 Alamo 14-Gold 2 1558 33-23 57% 14 TX
14866 Pipeline 16-Ultra jamie 1558 26-23 53% 16 CA
14867 Elevation 11-Timberline 1558 28-21 57% 11 CO
14868 Club Momentum 12-White 1558 2-0 100% 12 MN
14869 Forward 15-Red 1558 5-1 83% 15 FL
14870 Ridgetop VBC 18 1558 8-3 73% 18 PA
14871 Pride Volleyball Club 15 15s Adrienne (BY) 1558 4-2 67% 15 LA
14872 USA MI RunBird 16 1558 54-32 63% 16 MI
14873 Prime 16-Blue 1558 18-9 67% 16 CA
14874 Club GSL 14-Elect - kevin 1558 28-24 50% 14 UT
14875 Fusion 15 Power 1558 5-2 45% 15 WI
14876 Champion 12-Z purple 1558 15-13 52% 12 NC
14877 Legacy 14-Elite west 1558 32-17 65% 14 MI
14878 Big Sky Volleyball Club 16 Big Sky 16-4-2 (EV) (7) 1558 2-0 40% 16 MT
14879 COAST 15-R1 sophia 1558 16-11 59% 15 CA
14880 603 United 16-Central white 1558 19-19 50% 16 NH
14881 Pillar 13-Purple 1558 25-23 52% 13 OH
14882 MVI 13-Paula 1558 5-3 56% 13 ID
14883 Uptime VB 12-1 1558 17-13 57% 12 TN
14884 G3 12-Elite chris 1558 19-16 54% 12 MO
14885 War Eagle 15-1 voltage 1558 17-13 57% 15 AZ
14886 Ultimate G12-Blue 1558 19-13 59% 12 IL
14887 Spiketown VBC 12-2 1558 4-2 67% 12 OH
14888 Pgh Elite 12-Gold 1558 5-1 83% 12 PA
14889 LAVBC 11-Keiki 1557 4-4 50% 11 HI
14890 Alliance 16-White 1557 20-13 61% 16 CA
14891 BEVBC 12 Navy 1557 20-19 51% 12 MD
14892 Panda 17-Black 1557 19-12 61% 17 CA
14893 OK Charge 13 Select 1557 19-13 59% 13 OK
14894 ZTV 14-4 silver 1557 15-9 48% 14 MT
14895 TopFlight 16-National gr 1557 6-17 26% 16 NV
14896 GSL JO 11-1 1557 2-1 67% 11 MN
14897 OYVBA 17-1 1557 8-5 62% 17 MN
14898 DVA UA 14 Elite 1557 49-30 62% 14 IL
14899 NorthShore 16-Schafer 1557 13-8 62% 16 OH
14900 GSVC 14-Gold 1557 3-2 60% 14 NH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.