Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 297 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14801 Wichita Legacy 14-1 1558 4-2 67% 14 KS
14802 CLUB LEGACY 16-Bravo 1558 21-18 54% 16 NE
14803 Vibe 12-Neal 1558 18-15 55% 12 CA
14804 West County 16-1 1558 4-1 80% 16 CA
14805 North Iowa Blaze 14 1558 4-3 44% 14 IA
14806 VVVBC 16 Sky 1558 26-23 53% 16 WA
14807 PEAK 12-1 1558 11-9 55% 12 SC
14808 Midwest Juniors 13-1 1558 3-2 60% 13 KS
14809 The St. James 12 Navy 1558 24-24 47% 12 VA
14810 Vancouver Thunder Volleyball Club 14-White 1558 5-4 56% 14
14811 Decatur Force 15 Aqua 1558 25-20 56% 15 IN
14812 BRAVO 17-1 1558 28-14 67% 17 FL
14813 CSCV 16-1 1558 4-4 50% 16 TX
14814 ESO 13-Select 1558 9-5 64% 13 OH
14815 Madtown 15-3 national 1558 34-31 52% 15 WI
14816 Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 15-Girls black 1558 4-3 57% 15
14817 316VBC 15-Blue 1558 3-2 60% 15 KS
14818 OT 15-J perez 1558 2-6 25% 15 FL
14819 Hammerin Hawks 12-1 1558 2-1 50% 12 IA
14820 Iron 13-Black 1558 9-4 69% 13 AL
14821 Lady Raiders 14-Gold 1558 15-8 65% 14 IL
14822 PVA 15-Blue 1558 25-17 60% 15 VA
14823 CSNS 15-1 1558 19-12 61% 15 SC
14824 ASTARZ 18 1558 2-6 25% 18 WA
14825 Empowered 11-Elite black 1558 17-12 59% 11 IN
14826 The Edge 16-Black walter 1558 17-20 46% 16 CO
14827 NVA 14-White 1558 27-27 50% 14 PA
14828 CSVC 16-1 1558 23-21 52% 16 IN
14829 Endless VBC 16-Navy john 1558 8-8 50% 16 TX
14830 South Strand Heat 18 1558 16-7 70% 18 SC
14831 Mizuno Northern Lights 18-2 1558 14-25 36% 18 MN
14832 Platform 13-Navy 1558 16-13 48% 13 IA
14833 NE Elite 16-Altitude 1558 18-14 56% 16 NE
14834 KIVA 12-Jessica 1558 2-0 100% 12 KY
14835 540 VB 14 National 1558 31-25 55% 14 VA
14836 No Coast 13 Riptide 1558 26-28 48% 13 MO
14837 Tribe 12-1 1558 4-1 80% 12 OH
14838 KMS 12-Ruff 1558 3-1 75% 12 MN
14839 UVC 12-Tom 1558 4-2 67% 12 IL
14840 BRYC 16-White 1558 31-17 65% 16 VA
14841 mountain one OLD 16-1 1558 2-1 40% 16
14842 GRV 16-White 1558 3-2 60% 16 IN
14843 MWP 18-Purple 1558 20-11 65% 18 MN
14844 Rhythm 18 Macie 1558 12-21 36% 18 TN
14845 SVC Girls 17-1 1558 43-38 52% 17 NY
14846 Mojo Volleyball Utah 16-Elite 1558 4-6 40% 16 UT
14847 HP Illinois 14-Fuchsia 1558 2-0 67% 14 MO
14848 REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 15 REACH EXCEL 1558 4-9 31% 15 PA
14849 ARSEL 13-3 gilberto 1558 5-1 83% 13 PR
14850 Tuba City VBC 10-1 1558 9-5 64% 10 AZ
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.