2025-2026 Season — Page 296 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14751 | Jax Skyline 15-White | 1559 | 37-31 | 54% | 15 | FL |
| 14752 | MVA 15-Premier | 1559 | 56-31 | 64% | 15 | MI |
| 14753 | No Coast 15-Lights out | 1559 | 26-27 | 49% | 15 | MO |
| 14754 | ITVC 17-Baden | 1559 | 20-23 | 47% | 17 | WA |
| 14755 | Starlings 13-Black | 1559 | 3-1 | 60% | 13 | NE |
| 14756 | DIG 11-A maggie | 1559 | 4-1 | 80% | 11 | TX |
| 14757 | SWI3D 13-Black | 1559 | 6-3 | 67% | 13 | NE |
| 14758 | Santa Fe Storm 15-1 brie | 1559 | 4-1 | 57% | 15 | CO |
| 14759 | SVC JVC 17-Jing | 1559 | 8-13 | 38% | 17 | GA |
| 14760 | Panther Red Slam 11 | 1559 | 2-1 | 67% | 11 | IN |
| 14761 | ReachElite 10 | 1559 | 29-18 | 62% | 10 | FL |
| 14762 | SNVF 18-Mount baker | 1559 | 3-2 | 60% | 18 | WA |
| 14763 | CCVA 11-Elite | 1559 | 3-2 | 60% | 11 | CA |
| 14764 | Mindset Premier 18-Red | 1559 | 15-11 | 58% | 18 | IL |
| 14765 | WAVE 13-Audrey | 1559 | 16-10 | 62% | 13 | CA |
| 14766 | Delano 10-White | 1559 | 3-1 | 60% | 10 | MN |
| 14767 | Elevate 14 Hannah | 1559 | 31-22 | 58% | 14 | SC |
| 14768 | Richmond Volleyball Club 13 RVC VYVL Royals | 1559 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | |
| 14769 | Flying Fish 17 | 1559 | 27-13 | 68% | 17 | FL |
| 14770 | Deacon Flames 14-Black | 1559 | 8-7 | 53% | 14 | ND |
| 14771 | NorCal Supreme 14-Red | 1559 | 17-11 | 61% | 14 | CA |
| 14772 | Pannix 12-Black | 1559 | 8-9 | 47% | 12 | NC |
| 14773 | Rhythm 17-Local | 1559 | 7-3 | 70% | 17 | TN |
| 14774 | AVC 15-Pink mylee | 1559 | 4-1 | 80% | 15 | FL |
| 14775 | AVA TX 15-Power | 1559 | 14-11 | 56% | 15 | TX |
| 14776 | TNT 15 Nitro | 1559 | 33-40 | 45% | 15 | PA |
| 14777 | Force 13 | 1559 | 5-2 | 71% | 13 | UT |
| 14778 | Ashland VC 16-1 | 1559 | 8-6 | 57% | 16 | OR |
| 14779 | OT 12-T karly | 1559 | 25-22 | 53% | 12 | FL |
| 14780 | YVA 14-Green | 1559 | 15-5 | 71% | 14 | MT |
| 14781 | MAVA 12-GreatWhite | 1559 | 26-18 | 59% | 12 | KY |
| 14782 | NVA 14-Navy | 1559 | 5-3 | 56% | 14 | NE |
| 14783 | PAO Southside 17-Rda mls | 1559 | 35-26 | 57% | 17 | MO |
| 14784 | RHVC 15-1 purple | 1559 | 23-12 | 66% | 15 | KY |
| 14785 | City 14-Blue | 1559 | 18-21 | 46% | 14 | CA |
| 14786 | SIVBC 14 Inferno | 1559 | 30-35 | 46% | 14 | WA |
| 14787 | Rancho 17-Gold | 1559 | 29-23 | 56% | 17 | CA |
| 14788 | Bootheel SMASH 15-G | 1559 | 6-3 | 67% | 15 | MO |
| 14789 | MAVS KC 15-Regional | 1559 | 10-12 | 45% | 15 | KS |
| 14790 | Integrity Elite 13-Black | 1559 | 8-3 | 73% | 13 | IL |
| 14791 | RAJO 14-S red | 1559 | 10-3 | 71% | 14 | MN |
| 14792 | Apex VBTC 15-Apex white | 1559 | 29-30 | 49% | 15 | OH |
| 14793 | Enspire 16-Joel | 1559 | 35-18 | 66% | 16 | CA |
| 14794 | HOUNDS 13-S | 1559 | 25-12 | 68% | 13 | MN |
| 14795 | Ace Volleyball Club 16 U16 EP | 1559 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | CO |
| 14796 | ID Crush 16-Mclean | 1559 | 37-42 | 47% | 16 | ID |
| 14797 | Rapid Fire 12-Black | 1559 | 11-11 | 50% | 12 | IL |
| 14798 | WF Elite 11-Black | 1559 | 8-3 | 73% | 11 | TX |
| 14799 | Carolina Warriors 12-1 | 1558 | 25-19 | 57% | 12 | SC |
| 14800 | Lions South 14-2 | 1558 | 86-67 | 56% | 14 | IL |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.