Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 296 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14751 Jax Skyline 15-White 1559 37-31 54% 15 FL
14752 MVA 15-Premier 1559 56-31 64% 15 MI
14753 No Coast 15-Lights out 1559 26-27 49% 15 MO
14754 ITVC 17-Baden 1559 20-23 47% 17 WA
14755 Starlings 13-Black 1559 3-1 60% 13 NE
14756 DIG 11-A maggie 1559 4-1 80% 11 TX
14757 SWI3D 13-Black 1559 6-3 67% 13 NE
14758 Santa Fe Storm 15-1 brie 1559 4-1 57% 15 CO
14759 SVC JVC 17-Jing 1559 8-13 38% 17 GA
14760 Panther Red Slam 11 1559 2-1 67% 11 IN
14761 ReachElite 10 1559 29-18 62% 10 FL
14762 SNVF 18-Mount baker 1559 3-2 60% 18 WA
14763 CCVA 11-Elite 1559 3-2 60% 11 CA
14764 Mindset Premier 18-Red 1559 15-11 58% 18 IL
14765 WAVE 13-Audrey 1559 16-10 62% 13 CA
14766 Delano 10-White 1559 3-1 60% 10 MN
14767 Elevate 14 Hannah 1559 31-22 58% 14 SC
14768 Richmond Volleyball Club 13 RVC VYVL Royals 1559 3-2 60% 13
14769 Flying Fish 17 1559 27-13 68% 17 FL
14770 Deacon Flames 14-Black 1559 8-7 53% 14 ND
14771 NorCal Supreme 14-Red 1559 17-11 61% 14 CA
14772 Pannix 12-Black 1559 8-9 47% 12 NC
14773 Rhythm 17-Local 1559 7-3 70% 17 TN
14774 AVC 15-Pink mylee 1559 4-1 80% 15 FL
14775 AVA TX 15-Power 1559 14-11 56% 15 TX
14776 TNT 15 Nitro 1559 33-40 45% 15 PA
14777 Force 13 1559 5-2 71% 13 UT
14778 Ashland VC 16-1 1559 8-6 57% 16 OR
14779 OT 12-T karly 1559 25-22 53% 12 FL
14780 YVA 14-Green 1559 15-5 71% 14 MT
14781 MAVA 12-GreatWhite 1559 26-18 59% 12 KY
14782 NVA 14-Navy 1559 5-3 56% 14 NE
14783 PAO Southside 17-Rda mls 1559 35-26 57% 17 MO
14784 RHVC 15-1 purple 1559 23-12 66% 15 KY
14785 City 14-Blue 1559 18-21 46% 14 CA
14786 SIVBC 14 Inferno 1559 30-35 46% 14 WA
14787 Rancho 17-Gold 1559 29-23 56% 17 CA
14788 Bootheel SMASH 15-G 1559 6-3 67% 15 MO
14789 MAVS KC 15-Regional 1559 10-12 45% 15 KS
14790 Integrity Elite 13-Black 1559 8-3 73% 13 IL
14791 RAJO 14-S red 1559 10-3 71% 14 MN
14792 Apex VBTC 15-Apex white 1559 29-30 49% 15 OH
14793 Enspire 16-Joel 1559 35-18 66% 16 CA
14794 HOUNDS 13-S 1559 25-12 68% 13 MN
14795 Ace Volleyball Club 16 U16 EP 1559 5-3 63% 16 CO
14796 ID Crush 16-Mclean 1559 37-42 47% 16 ID
14797 Rapid Fire 12-Black 1559 11-11 50% 12 IL
14798 WF Elite 11-Black 1559 8-3 73% 11 TX
14799 Carolina Warriors 12-1 1558 25-19 57% 12 SC
14800 Lions South 14-2 1558 86-67 56% 14 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.