Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 293 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14601 Spiketown USA 14.1 1561 35-19 65% 14 WI
14602 South County 17-National 1561 31-31 50% 17 RI
14603 Net Force 16-2 legacy 1561 23-9 66% 16 IA
14604 NIVA South 12-Gazelles 1561 3-1 75% 12 IN
14605 CRUSH 13 1561 14-10 50% 13 NY
14606 SoCal VBC 16-Grandview 1561 30-16 65% 16 CA
14607 UPVBC 16-Pink 1561 29-25 54% 16 OK
14608 SET IT OFF 16u 1561 4-1 80% 16 FL
14609 Richmond SOL Premier 14-Gold 1561 12-10 55% 14 CA
14610 TAV 15-Blue 1561 32-29 52% 15 IL
14611 Pgh Elite 14-Black 1561 13-10 57% 14 PA
14612 PIRATAS ADN 15-1 1561 5-14 26% 15 PR
14613 SSVBC 17-1 1561 26-36 42% 17 NH
14614 ATOMIC 14-Smack n1 1561 35-33 51% 14 AZ
14615 IA Elite 13-Storm 1561 3-1 60% 13 IA
14616 MCV 18-1 1561 18-9 67% 18 CA
14617 MiElite 15-Gold north 1561 21-7 75% 15 MI
14618 BAVC 18-2 joslin 1561 3-5 38% 18 NV
14619 IMPACT Elite 15-Purple 1561 5-2 71% 15
14620 North Shore Stars 15 1561 5-2 71% 15
14621 Junior Bison Volleyball Club 15-Brown 1561 7-2 78% 15
14622 Carolina ICE 17-Nat 1561 21-27 44% 17 SC
14623 Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 15-Girls red 1561 6-2 75% 15
14624 FAVA 13 1561 5-4 50% 13 PA
14625 LA South 15-S 1561 24-13 65% 15 LA
14626 Rival 14-Black 1561 20-13 61% 14 NY
14627 Club Gold 15-Blue 1561 6-5 55% 15 WA
14628 SKY Elite 16-1 1560 6-2 75% 16 PA
14629 TC ELITE 12 CALEY 1560 27-19 59% 12 LA
14630 TPV 14-Navy 1560 28-16 64% 14 TN
14631 ID Impact 14-Ashlyn 1560 10-6 63% 14 WA
14632 Ascent 16-1 1560 20-19 45% 16 MT
14633 Pipeline 16-Ultra tori 1560 31-19 62% 16 CA
14634 CVA 15-Kelly 1560 2-2 50% 15 IA
14635 Riptide 17-1 1560 14-9 61% 17 MN
14636 Kako'o VBA 14-Hunny 1560 4-1 80% 14 HI
14637 Austin County 11-Red 1560 5-1 71% 11 TX
14638 NM Cactus VBC 13-1 1560 0-0 0% 13 CO
14639 MJVA 16-3 1560 6-3 67% 16 GA
14640 TVS 12 Alexis 1560 8-4 57% 12 TX
14641 Flash 16-Caroline 1560 9-5 64% 16 CA
14642 NW Elite 14-2 black 1560 23-19 55% 14 OR
14643 Legit 14-Gray 1560 3-2 60% 14 IA
14644 CVA 14-1 pfadenhauer 1560 18-8 58% 14 IA
14645 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 13-T cass 1560 15-12 56% 13 NJ
14646 ECVC 13-National - karla 1560 9-8 53% 13 AL
14647 Inside Out 13-Black 1560 22-14 61% 13 MI
14648 Hive 14-Grey 1560 12-17 36% 14 UT
14649 FaR Out 13 Silver 1560 27-11 71% 13 MI
14650 MOD Regional 12-Black 1560 8-4 67% 12 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.