2025-2026 Season — Page 292 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14551 | Eastside Volleyball Club Tournament 12 Morton Aces 6th Grade (GL) | 1561 | 3-2 | 60% | 12 | IL |
| 14552 | ATOMIC 14-Smack n1 | 1561 | 35-33 | 51% | 14 | AZ |
| 14553 | PIRATAS ADN 15-1 | 1561 | 5-14 | 26% | 15 | PR |
| 14554 | SSVBC 17-1 | 1561 | 26-36 | 42% | 17 | NH |
| 14555 | MOD Elite 16-Gold | 1561 | 30-33 | 48% | 16 | IL |
| 14556 | Junior Bison Volleyball Club 15-Brown | 1561 | 7-2 | 78% | 15 | |
| 14557 | Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 15-Girls red | 1561 | 6-2 | 75% | 15 | |
| 14558 | IMPACT Elite 15-Purple | 1561 | 5-2 | 71% | 15 | |
| 14559 | MiElite 15-Gold north | 1561 | 21-7 | 75% | 15 | MI |
| 14560 | Ascent 15-Black | 1561 | 23-20 | 53% | 15 | AZ |
| 14561 | MCV 18-1 | 1561 | 18-9 | 67% | 18 | CA |
| 14562 | OLC 18-Purple elite | 1561 | 29-16 | 64% | 18 | SC |
| 14563 | Club Unite 17-Knox blue | 1561 | 24-14 | 63% | 17 | TN |
| 14564 | FAVA 13 | 1561 | 5-4 | 50% | 13 | PA |
| 14565 | UPVBC 16-Pink | 1561 | 29-25 | 54% | 16 | OK |
| 14566 | BAVC 18-2 joslin | 1561 | 3-5 | 38% | 18 | NV |
| 14567 | ALL IN 17-2 | 1561 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | NV |
| 14568 | SF TREMORS 18-Jaguars | 1561 | 17-19 | 47% | 18 | CA |
| 14569 | LA South 15-S | 1561 | 24-13 | 65% | 15 | LA |
| 14570 | AVA 16-N schumacher | 1561 | 19-32 | 37% | 16 | OH |
| 14571 | Red Rock 14-Jada - redwood city | 1561 | 19-20 | 49% | 14 | CA |
| 14572 | Tstreet SN 13-Alyssa | 1561 | 21-13 | 62% | 13 | NV |
| 14573 | TAV 15-Blue | 1561 | 32-29 | 52% | 15 | IL |
| 14574 | Gibbstown Spikers 14U | 1561 | 21-13 | 57% | 14 | NJ |
| 14575 | White Stone Volleyball Club 12 White Stone U11/12 | 1561 | 14-11 | 56% | 12 | CA |
| 14576 | ATOMIC 15-Smack n1 | 1561 | 38-39 | 49% | 15 | AZ |
| 14577 | Upstate 13 Seneca | 1561 | 12-12 | 50% | 13 | SC |
| 14578 | United 14-Bhm blue | 1561 | 16-13 | 55% | 14 | AL |
| 14579 | Eastside 12-R mcdonnell | 1561 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | OH |
| 14580 | Courthouse 15-Blue 2 | 1561 | 31-13 | 69% | 15 | OR |
| 14581 | RVBC 14-Royal | 1561 | 11-5 | 69% | 14 | PA |
| 14582 | West Dubuque Thunder 10 | 1561 | 2-0 | 67% | 10 | IA |
| 14583 | Illini NW 13-Aqua | 1561 | 8-4 | 62% | 13 | IL |
| 14584 | Legit 17-G malea | 1561 | 5-3 | 63% | 17 | IA |
| 14585 | ATN 18 | 1561 | 28-26 | 52% | 18 | CA |
| 14586 | Instinct VBC 14-Wild gold | 1561 | 6-9 | 40% | 14 | TX |
| 14587 | ECC 18-South national | 1561 | 19-20 | 49% | 18 | NJ |
| 14588 | NMB 14-Pink mion | 1561 | 16-13 | 55% | 14 | FL |
| 14589 | Colorado Springs Alt CSA 13-Navy | 1561 | 21-22 | 49% | 13 | CO |
| 14590 | Dig Deep 13-Stars | 1561 | 14-7 | 61% | 13 | NH |
| 14591 | Mountain Crush 18-1 | 1561 | 9-8 | 53% | 18 | AZ |
| 14592 | 208 14-Spokane | 1561 | 23-17 | 57% | 14 | ID |
| 14593 | Invasion Volleyball Club 13-2 | 1561 | 6-6 | 38% | 13 | MO |
| 14594 | Pono 11-1 brian | 1561 | 14-12 | 52% | 11 | TX |
| 14595 | Impact 14-1 (NO) | 1561 | 14-9 | 61% | 14 | MN |
| 14596 | SoCal VBC 16-Grandview | 1561 | 30-16 | 65% | 16 | CA |
| 14597 | SF Juniors 13-Black | 1561 | 19-24 | 44% | 13 | CA |
| 14598 | NIVA South 12-Gazelles | 1561 | 3-1 | 75% | 12 | IN |
| 14599 | CRVBC 15-1 owls | 1561 | 18-10 | 58% | 15 | NH |
| 14600 | Richmond SOL Premier 14-Gold | 1561 | 12-10 | 55% | 14 | CA |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.