Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 292 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14551 Eastside Volleyball Club Tournament 12 Morton Aces 6th Grade (GL) 1561 3-2 60% 12 IL
14552 ATOMIC 14-Smack n1 1561 35-33 51% 14 AZ
14553 PIRATAS ADN 15-1 1561 5-14 26% 15 PR
14554 SSVBC 17-1 1561 26-36 42% 17 NH
14555 MOD Elite 16-Gold 1561 30-33 48% 16 IL
14556 Junior Bison Volleyball Club 15-Brown 1561 7-2 78% 15
14557 Pacific Coast Volleyball Club 15-Girls red 1561 6-2 75% 15
14558 IMPACT Elite 15-Purple 1561 5-2 71% 15
14559 MiElite 15-Gold north 1561 21-7 75% 15 MI
14560 Ascent 15-Black 1561 23-20 53% 15 AZ
14561 MCV 18-1 1561 18-9 67% 18 CA
14562 OLC 18-Purple elite 1561 29-16 64% 18 SC
14563 Club Unite 17-Knox blue 1561 24-14 63% 17 TN
14564 FAVA 13 1561 5-4 50% 13 PA
14565 UPVBC 16-Pink 1561 29-25 54% 16 OK
14566 BAVC 18-2 joslin 1561 3-5 38% 18 NV
14567 ALL IN 17-2 1561 4-1 80% 17 NV
14568 SF TREMORS 18-Jaguars 1561 17-19 47% 18 CA
14569 LA South 15-S 1561 24-13 65% 15 LA
14570 AVA 16-N schumacher 1561 19-32 37% 16 OH
14571 Red Rock 14-Jada - redwood city 1561 19-20 49% 14 CA
14572 Tstreet SN 13-Alyssa 1561 21-13 62% 13 NV
14573 TAV 15-Blue 1561 32-29 52% 15 IL
14574 Gibbstown Spikers 14U 1561 21-13 57% 14 NJ
14575 White Stone Volleyball Club 12 White Stone U11/12 1561 14-11 56% 12 CA
14576 ATOMIC 15-Smack n1 1561 38-39 49% 15 AZ
14577 Upstate 13 Seneca 1561 12-12 50% 13 SC
14578 United 14-Bhm blue 1561 16-13 55% 14 AL
14579 Eastside 12-R mcdonnell 1561 3-1 75% 12 OH
14580 Courthouse 15-Blue 2 1561 31-13 69% 15 OR
14581 RVBC 14-Royal 1561 11-5 69% 14 PA
14582 West Dubuque Thunder 10 1561 2-0 67% 10 IA
14583 Illini NW 13-Aqua 1561 8-4 62% 13 IL
14584 Legit 17-G malea 1561 5-3 63% 17 IA
14585 ATN 18 1561 28-26 52% 18 CA
14586 Instinct VBC 14-Wild gold 1561 6-9 40% 14 TX
14587 ECC 18-South national 1561 19-20 49% 18 NJ
14588 NMB 14-Pink mion 1561 16-13 55% 14 FL
14589 Colorado Springs Alt CSA 13-Navy 1561 21-22 49% 13 CO
14590 Dig Deep 13-Stars 1561 14-7 61% 13 NH
14591 Mountain Crush 18-1 1561 9-8 53% 18 AZ
14592 208 14-Spokane 1561 23-17 57% 14 ID
14593 Invasion Volleyball Club 13-2 1561 6-6 38% 13 MO
14594 Pono 11-1 brian 1561 14-12 52% 11 TX
14595 Impact 14-1 (NO) 1561 14-9 61% 14 MN
14596 SoCal VBC 16-Grandview 1561 30-16 65% 16 CA
14597 SF Juniors 13-Black 1561 19-24 44% 13 CA
14598 NIVA South 12-Gazelles 1561 3-1 75% 12 IN
14599 CRVBC 15-1 owls 1561 18-10 58% 15 NH
14600 Richmond SOL Premier 14-Gold 1561 12-10 55% 14 CA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.