Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 291 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14501 Top Flight 14-Gamma 1562 7-4 64% 14 IL
14502 Next Level 14-3 christian 1562 5-1 83% 14 PR
14503 MOXIE COQUI TUPELO 17-Pink 1562 18-12 58% 17 MS
14504 Reef Volleyball Club 16-Select 1562 25-15 63% 16 CA
14505 Laguna Niguel Breakers 15-1 1562 23-15 61% 15 CA
14506 Northern Attack 18 1562 17-7 71% 18 MN
14507 Sherwood Synergy 13-Green 1562 5-3 63% 13 AR
14508 EC Power Chesapeake 18-Black 1562 3-4 43% 18 PA
14509 Club Legacy 13-Bravo 1562 13-12 52% 13 NE
14510 Augusta Juniors Volleyball Club 13-Madison 1562 22-13 63% 13 GA
14511 AEV 14 American 1562 22-14 61% 14 TX
14512 Lena Legends 14 1562 12-11 48% 14 IL
14513 AVBC 12 National 1562 28-22 56% 12 MI
14514 LVT Select 13-Tiffany 1562 21-17 55% 13 FL
14515 Ridgecrest Starlings 17 1562 4-3 57% 17 CA
14516 Idaho LUV 14-Paige 1562 8-9 44% 14 ID
14517 JVC San Lorenzo 17-2 1562 4-1 80% 17 PR
14518 Sideout 14 1562 5-4 56% 14 WA
14519 Wind 13-1 1562 7-3 70% 13 OK
14520 Mill City 13 1562 21-26 45% 13 MA
14521 HP 12-Black 1562 23-10 70% 12 MI
14522 Club V 17-Prodigy austin 1562 15-37 29% 17 UT
14523 Midwest Juniors 14-1 1562 4-1 80% 14 KS
14524 Midwest United 14 Navy 1562 32-25 56% 14 MN
14525 VolleyFX 14 Conjure 1562 29-28 49% 14 NY
14526 Wisconsin Ice 14 National 1562 22-23 49% 14 WI
14527 NWI Premier 14-Black 1562 13-11 54% 14 IA
14528 Panhandle Powerhouse 10 and 11 1562 4-0 100% 11 NE
14529 FVC 16-Thunder 1562 6-3 60% 16 NE
14530 Paradigm Volleyball Club 16 Paradigm Rumble 1562 11-3 79% 16 NY
14531 360VBA 14-1 1562 28-15 64% 14 WI
14532 CJV 14-Select navy 1562 36-22 62% 14 NC
14533 ARVBC 14-Black 1562 5-4 56% 14 GA
14534 BLACK ROSE 18-Black 1562 15-6 68% 18 PA
14535 GRIT 17-Blue 1562 12-13 48% 17 IN
14536 Phoenix Rising 14-Kelsi / jacinth 1562 18-11 62% 14 TN
14537 SCVB 12-Riley 1562 21-25 46% 12 CA
14538 Legends 12-1william 1562 11-9 55% 12 PR
14539 Buckeye 15-Red national 1562 19-33 37% 15 OH
14540 FTL 15-Nuclear a 1562 19-10 66% 15 FL
14541 Colorado Elite 14-Kodiak 1562 28-29 49% 14 CO
14542 NEK Storm 16-1 1562 5-2 71% 16 KS
14543 Legacy 11-Elite west 1562 26-15 63% 11 MI
14544 FLASH 17 1562 3-2 60% 17 PA
14545 MN Select 16-Royal 1561 5-3 63% 16 MN
14546 FVC 17-Tempest 1561 26-22 53% 17 MD
14547 IMPACT - 13-3 1561 10-8 56% 13 TX
14548 Ignition 18 U17 1561 9-4 69% 18 WA
14549 Wisconsin Blaze 15-Black 1561 31-28 53% 15 WI
14550 Pono 11-1 brian 1561 14-12 52% 11 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.