Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 294 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
14651 BRUSA 15-Carlos 1560 24-17 59% 15 CA
14652 AZ Valor 16-Premier 1560 37-19 66% 16 AZ
14653 Flash 16-Caroline 1560 9-5 64% 16 CA
14654 Freedom G14-1 1560 8-7 50% 14 MO
14655 Ignite 14-Blaze 1560 24-23 51% 14 TX
14656 NSVBC 15-Select blue 1560 15-14 52% 15 WI
14657 Ohana Storm 14-Willie 1560 19-14 58% 14 CA
14658 Southern Extreme Volleyball 15-1 1560 13-10 54% 15 MN
14659 MVP 14-Gold 1560 20-23 47% 14 SC
14660 Club One AZ 13-Gold 1560 37-30 55% 13 AZ
14661 SMV 14-5 silver 1560 30-19 61% 14 MN
14662 Mem Metro 11-Travel black 1560 13-11 54% 11 TN
14663 Aspire 14-Pink 1560 9-7 56% 14 AZ
14664 BORINQUEN COQUI 17 BORINQUEN COQUI CPT 2027 1560 8-7 53% 17 PR
14665 Orange Crush 11 1560 6-3 55% 11 IA
14666 Rise 11-1 1560 6-5 55% 11 OH
14667 GRIT 14-BLUE 1560 21-11 64% 14 IN
14668 RHVC 16-1 1560 24-14 63% 16 KY
14669 NY Shark Attack 12 1560 11-7 48% 12 NY
14670 Club Koa 15-Black 1560 45-48 48% 15 CA
14671 Kako'o VBA 14-Hunny 1560 4-1 80% 14 HI
14672 NJVBC 15-Black panthers 1560 6-3 67% 15 NJ
14673 HVA 12-RED 1560 12-11 52% 12 TX
14674 Evolve 17-Red 1560 3-2 60% 17 CA
14675 ENCORE 12-Ava 1560 3-1 75% 12 CA
14676 LCVC 12 (NO) 1560 3-2 60% 12 MN
14677 Central Missouri VBC G13-2 1560 8-7 40% 13 IN
14678 Kali 15-F luis 1560 13-11 54% 15 PR
14679 NW Elite 14-2 black 1560 23-19 55% 14 OR
14680 Hive 14-Grey 1560 12-17 36% 14 UT
14681 SKY Elite 16-1 1560 6-2 75% 16 PA
14682 Jays 16-Blue 1560 7-2 78% 16 ND
14683 True North Volleyball Academy 14-1 1560 5-3 45% 14 MO
14684 Putnam VBC 17 Putnam VBC - Winter 1560 7-3 70% 17 OH
14685 Pursuit 10-Elite 1560 9-7 56% 10 MO
14686 SA Valkyries 13-Purple 1560 20-13 59% 13 TX
14687 Austin County 11-Red 1560 5-1 71% 11 TX
14688 TVS 12 Alexis 1560 8-4 57% 12 TX
14689 KIVA 10 Lauren 1560 4-2 67% 10 KY
14690 Boss CLE 15-3 1560 26-22 54% 15 OH
14691 Juggernaut 14-Regional 1 1560 29-19 60% 14 CO
14692 MOD Regional 12-Black 1560 8-4 67% 12 IL
14693 Ascent 16-1 1560 20-19 45% 16 MT
14694 IOWA VIBE TEAL 15 1560 2-1 40% 15 IA
14695 Infinite Training Volleyball Club 15 ITVC 15'S 1560 13-12 52% 15 CA
14696 TPV 14-Navy 1560 28-16 64% 14 TN
14697 TC ELITE 12 CALEY 1560 27-19 59% 12 LA
14698 CVA 15-Kelly 1560 2-2 50% 15 IA
14699 Pipeline 16-Ultra tori 1560 31-19 62% 16 CA
14700 Iowa Rockets 15 AW 1560 27-22 55% 15 IA
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.