Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 279 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13901 Shenandoah Surge Volleyball Club 15 SHENANDOAH SURGE MD -14/15uTEAL (CH) 1569 19-11 59% 15 MD
13902 GVC 16-1 1569 23-28 45% 16 CT
13903 Cap City 16-Reg diamonds 1569 16-14 44% 16 MT
13904 Venetian Bay Volleyball Club 17 17u Venetian Bay FL 1569 19-14 58% 17 FL
13905 Pipeline SCVBC 17-Adidas 1569 28-20 58% 17 CA
13906 NYCLI 14 Elite 1569 26-24 52% 14 NY
13907 PEAK 15-4 1569 9-7 56% 15 OK
13908 305VBC 11-R pedro 1569 20-13 61% 11 FL
13909 OK Elevate 13-1 1569 37-18 66% 13 OK
13910 Loggers 12 1569 3-1 75% 12 MN
13911 Four1Nine Xtreme 12 12-Rodriquez (OV) 1569 4-1 80% 12 OH
13912 Prime X Volleyball 17-1 1569 24-18 57% 17 TX
13913 KSA 12-Red 1569 20-14 59% 12 KY
13914 VCNebraska 15-White 1569 5-5 50% 15 NE
13915 Infinite Training Volleyball Club 13 ITVC 13'S 1569 11-6 65% 13 CA
13916 Lions South 17-1 1569 53-36 60% 17 IL
13917 Sunshine 12-Elite 1569 25-30 45% 12 CA
13918 EVBA 12-Green 1569 6-4 60% 12 MN
13919 Maricopa 18-Navy 1569 6-2 75% 18 CA
13920 AJV 15-Cedar park 1569 28-18 61% 15 TX
13921 Actsports 18-Glover/morland 1569 16-11 59% 18 VA
13922 SF Elite 14-Premier 1569 19-15 56% 14 CA
13923 Centennial Volleyball Club 12-1 1569 11-14 44% 12 MN
13924 HORIZON VBC G13-1 1569 6-7 38% 13 KY
13925 Upontop 11-S - tim jr 1569 18-6 75% 11 FL
13926 AVC Nebraska 15-White 1569 26-19 53% 15 NE
13927 EVA 11-White 1569 19-12 59% 11 AR
13928 Main Beach 13-Power 1569 12-13 48% 13 CA
13929 SVC 15-U makos 1569 27-16 63% 15 SC
13930 Metro Volleyball Club 13-East 1569 27-14 63% 13 DC
13931 WPVC 13-Armour orange 1569 36-34 51% 13 FL
13932 Prime Performance 14-Teal 1569 35-30 54% 14 AZ
13933 REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 14 REACH DESTINY 1569 4-1 80% 14 PA
13934 Velocity 16-Red 1 1569 15-10 60% 16 MS
13935 Texas 512 15-Orange 1569 30-21 58% 15 TX
13936 Max Performance 16-Tony 1569 26-15 55% 16 MA
13937 Vaqueras 16-F jimmy g 1569 17-10 63% 16 PR
13938 SIVA 16-Black 1569 24-16 60% 16 ID
13939 Elevate HI 15-1 1569 5-1 83% 15 HI
13940 Peak VA 12-Black 1569 14-17 42% 12 TX
13941 Blocksport 13-Nat 1569 6-3 60% 13 TX
13942 BC Rise 14-Adidas 1569 13-9 59% 14 TX
13943 JCVC 17-1 1569 7-4 64% 17 NC
13944 Alamo 15 Silver 1569 25-21 53% 15 TX
13945 AVC 13-Red 1569 24-12 60% 13 PA
13946 SPVC 18-2 1569 4-1 80% 18 NV
13947 Onyx 14-1 1569 4-3 57% 14 CA
13948 STORM 14-Don/jen 1569 28-21 57% 14 CA
13949 SLAM 13-P black 1569 29-22 57% 13 MA
13950 Southern MN Aces 15 Southern MN ACES-16's 1569 6-5 55% 15
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.