Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 278 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13851 MVP 60450 16-Red 1570 11-4 69% 16 IL
13852 Monarcas Volleyball Club 16 1570 5-2 71% 16 PR
13853 HJV 15-Adidas 1570 14-12 54% 15 TX
13854 NYC Impact Volleyball Club 14-Black 1570 4-2 67% 14 NJ
13855 SF TREMORS 13 JAGUARS 1570 21-20 51% 13 CA
13856 ShowTime Blue 13 1570 39-25 57% 13 TX
13857 Ridgeland Reds 14-Red 1570 4-3 57% 14 MN
13858 AppVC 17-Elite black 1570 26-18 59% 17 NC
13859 Tstreet SN 18-Dana 1570 24-23 51% 18 NV
13860 RADD Elite 16-Red 1570 7-7 50% 16 FL
13861 Northern Lights 14-S 1570 23-8 74% 14 WI
13862 CC VEL 16-1 1570 23-22 51% 16 TX
13863 Five Star 12-North 1570 16-12 57% 12 CO
13864 NJVBC 17-Ravens 1570 10-5 67% 17 NJ
13865 BEV 18 Empire 1570 31-27 53% 18 NY
13866 CG 14-Black 1570 4-4 50% 14 WA
13867 Balboa Bay 15-White 1570 27-24 53% 15 CA
13868 Falcon Volleyball Club 17 1570 2-0 40% 17 IA
13869 NetForce 25-26 17-S 1570 12-5 71% 17 VA
13870 TC ELITE 16-Heaven 1570 15-17 47% 16 LA
13871 Clarence VBC 16-1 1570 17-10 57% 16 NY
13872 Mana Toa 18-1 1570 3-2 60% 18 AL
13873 Black Hills Juniors 16-Gold 1570 3-5 38% 16 WY
13874 South Central Select VBC 14 14 Travel (NO) 1570 8-2 67% 14 ND
13875 Iowa Impact 14-2 premier 1570 17-8 61% 14 IA
13876 FTL 15-Nuclear adams 1570 21-11 66% 15 FL
13877 Canuck VBC 16-1 1570 2-5 29% 16 AB
13878 Ama Xtreme 16-Intensity 1570 3-1 75% 16
13879 Club Attack 12-Erin 1569 10-7 59% 12
13880 C2K Volleyball Club 13 13 Garlock (OV) (12) 1569 3-1 75% 13
13881 HTF 17 1569 6-3 55% 17 SC
13882 MBTV 14-Red 1569 17-13 57% 14 OH
13883 ID Crush 10-Bettis 1569 4-3 57% 10 ID
13884 Cabatu 14-National 1569 15-12 56% 14 AL
13885 Miami Hype 16-Premier1 1569 40-19 68% 16 FL
13886 HEMOLELE 12 1569 4-2 67% 12 HI
13887 UNION 13-Ky white 1569 32-15 68% 13 IN
13888 SNVF 16-Mount adams 1569 3-1 75% 16 WA
13889 TeamLVC 16-Pink 1569 31-20 61% 16 NY
13890 SV Vipers 17 1569 30-14 61% 17 NY
13891 SKEVA 14-Blue 1569 48-38 56% 14 KY
13892 PIVC Storm 14-Elite madi 1569 28-24 54% 14 AL
13893 DN 14-White 1569 13-8 57% 14 TX
13894 JERSEY JRS 16-National 1569 9-6 60% 16 NJ
13895 Vital 12-1 gold 1569 32-27 54% 12 MN
13896 ENVY 15-Flood 1569 32-15 68% 15 RI
13897 HVC Ace Angels 12 1569 17-11 61% 12 TX
13898 ACV 14-A 1569 7-4 50% 14 IA
13899 CEVC 17-1 1569 5-2 71% 17 NY
13900 CVC 17-National (NE) 1569 6-2 75% 17 NE
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.