2025-2026 Season — Page 280 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13951 | Aspire 12-1 black | 1568 | 23-19 | 55% | 12 | AB |
| 13952 | Summit 12-National blue | 1568 | 19-27 | 38% | 12 | TX |
| 13953 | AZ SKY 10-Blue | 1568 | 7-5 | 58% | 10 | AZ |
| 13954 | MoCo Jrs 12-Adidas | 1568 | 14-7 | 67% | 12 | TX |
| 13955 | Crossfire 15-Red | 1568 | 35-15 | 70% | 15 | MN |
| 13956 | PEAK 10-2 | 1568 | 21-12 | 64% | 10 | OK |
| 13957 | SDVBC 13-Connor | 1568 | 29-16 | 64% | 13 | CA |
| 13958 | TORCH 15-Ellie | 1568 | 31-20 | 61% | 15 | CA |
| 13959 | Minneota 13-S | 1568 | 3-2 | 60% | 13 | MN |
| 13960 | MVP 60450 13U Red | 1568 | 20-10 | 67% | 13 | IL |
| 13961 | ForwardVB 14-Red | 1568 | 18-10 | 64% | 14 | FL |
| 13962 | Southern Pines Volleyball Club 12 SPVC Shortleaf Pine | 1568 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | GA |
| 13963 | New WAVE 18 Tsunami | 1568 | 34-20 | 63% | 18 | IL |
| 13964 | NHVB 12-1 | 1568 | 6-5 | 55% | 12 | MN |
| 13965 | Spire VC 17-Palm | 1568 | 16-9 | 64% | 17 | OH |
| 13966 | Ultra Blues 15 | 1568 | 9-5 | 64% | 15 | PA |
| 13967 | IVC 14-Catherine | 1568 | 14-7 | 58% | 14 | TX |
| 13968 | North Point 15-National | 1568 | 26-16 | 54% | 15 | TX |
| 13969 | LBJ 16-1 | 1568 | 11-4 | 58% | 16 | ND |
| 13970 | West Central Force 16-S | 1568 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | MN |
| 13971 | Hive 17-Black | 1568 | 27-24 | 53% | 17 | UT |
| 13972 | CPU CVB "The Storm" CPU CVB 15-Black | 1568 | 4-2 | 67% | 15 | IA |
| 13973 | Shonto Starlings 14-S green | 1568 | 25-13 | 66% | 14 | AZ |
| 13974 | AVA 13-R hemsink | 1568 | 5-4 | 56% | 13 | OH |
| 13975 | Impact Vball Club 15 | 1568 | 46-27 | 61% | 15 | MO |
| 13976 | A5 Volleyball Club 13-Stars | 1568 | 4-1 | 80% | 13 | GA |
| 13977 | SCVC 17-2 leslee | 1568 | 14-6 | 70% | 17 | TN |
| 13978 | MVC 12-1 | 1568 | 9-3 | 64% | 12 | OH |
| 13979 | ESVBC 14-Vipers local | 1568 | 15-10 | 60% | 14 | IA |
| 13980 | OK Charge 10-Ua | 1568 | 17-15 | 50% | 10 | OK |
| 13981 | JoCo Volleyball Club 13-1 | 1568 | 8-3 | 73% | 13 | NC |
| 13982 | Freeze ND 15 Polar | 1568 | 24-21 | 52% | 15 | ND |
| 13983 | Shockwave VB Academy 12-2 | 1568 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | KS |
| 13984 | JAG VBC 11-1 | 1568 | 12-7 | 63% | 11 | WI |
| 13985 | Montverde Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1568 | 11-21 | 34% | 18 | FL |
| 13986 | AVB Fire 16-1 | 1568 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | MN |
| 13987 | Premier PEAK 16 | 1568 | 89-70 | 56% | 16 | DE |
| 13988 | Southwest Extreme 13 | 1568 | 4-0 | 100% | 13 | LA |
| 13989 | Coastal VBC 13-White | 1568 | 22-10 | 61% | 13 | DE |
| 13990 | MVVC 11-Black | 1568 | 7-1 | 88% | 11 | NV |
| 13991 | MN CORE 13-1 | 1568 | 13-11 | 52% | 13 | MN |
| 13992 | New York Elite 15-Black | 1568 | 19-27 | 41% | 15 | NY |
| 13993 | MJVA 17-2 | 1568 | 3-4 | 43% | 17 | GA |
| 13994 | TW Skyline 16-White | 1568 | 14-15 | 48% | 16 | TX |
| 13995 | TX FLAMES 13-National | 1568 | 20-22 | 48% | 13 | TX |
| 13996 | DJRVB 14-N | 1568 | 12-21 | 36% | 14 | IN |
| 13997 | Meraki VB 13-1 | 1568 | 15-17 | 44% | 13 | NH |
| 13998 | K1 Bayamon Moncho 16-20 | 1568 | 4-1 | 80% | 16 | PR |
| 13999 | HBJ 14-River valley | 1568 | 10-4 | 71% | 14 | AR |
| 14000 | UVC 12-Blue | 1568 | 4-2 | 67% | 12 | TX |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.