Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 280 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13951 Aspire 12-1 black 1568 23-19 55% 12 AB
13952 Summit 12-National blue 1568 19-27 38% 12 TX
13953 AZ SKY 10-Blue 1568 7-5 58% 10 AZ
13954 MoCo Jrs 12-Adidas 1568 14-7 67% 12 TX
13955 Crossfire 15-Red 1568 35-15 70% 15 MN
13956 PEAK 10-2 1568 21-12 64% 10 OK
13957 SDVBC 13-Connor 1568 29-16 64% 13 CA
13958 TORCH 15-Ellie 1568 31-20 61% 15 CA
13959 Minneota 13-S 1568 3-2 60% 13 MN
13960 MVP 60450 13U Red 1568 20-10 67% 13 IL
13961 ForwardVB 14-Red 1568 18-10 64% 14 FL
13962 Southern Pines Volleyball Club 12 SPVC Shortleaf Pine 1568 4-2 67% 12 GA
13963 New WAVE 18 Tsunami 1568 34-20 63% 18 IL
13964 NHVB 12-1 1568 6-5 55% 12 MN
13965 Spire VC 17-Palm 1568 16-9 64% 17 OH
13966 Ultra Blues 15 1568 9-5 64% 15 PA
13967 IVC 14-Catherine 1568 14-7 58% 14 TX
13968 North Point 15-National 1568 26-16 54% 15 TX
13969 LBJ 16-1 1568 11-4 58% 16 ND
13970 West Central Force 16-S 1568 6-4 60% 16 MN
13971 Hive 17-Black 1568 27-24 53% 17 UT
13972 CPU CVB "The Storm" CPU CVB 15-Black 1568 4-2 67% 15 IA
13973 Shonto Starlings 14-S green 1568 25-13 66% 14 AZ
13974 AVA 13-R hemsink 1568 5-4 56% 13 OH
13975 Impact Vball Club 15 1568 46-27 61% 15 MO
13976 A5 Volleyball Club 13-Stars 1568 4-1 80% 13 GA
13977 SCVC 17-2 leslee 1568 14-6 70% 17 TN
13978 MVC 12-1 1568 9-3 64% 12 OH
13979 ESVBC 14-Vipers local 1568 15-10 60% 14 IA
13980 OK Charge 10-Ua 1568 17-15 50% 10 OK
13981 JoCo Volleyball Club 13-1 1568 8-3 73% 13 NC
13982 Freeze ND 15 Polar 1568 24-21 52% 15 ND
13983 Shockwave VB Academy 12-2 1568 4-2 67% 12 KS
13984 JAG VBC 11-1 1568 12-7 63% 11 WI
13985 Montverde Volleyball Club 18-1 1568 11-21 34% 18 FL
13986 AVB Fire 16-1 1568 3-2 60% 16 MN
13987 Premier PEAK 16 1568 89-70 56% 16 DE
13988 Southwest Extreme 13 1568 4-0 100% 13 LA
13989 Coastal VBC 13-White 1568 22-10 61% 13 DE
13990 MVVC 11-Black 1568 7-1 88% 11 NV
13991 MN CORE 13-1 1568 13-11 52% 13 MN
13992 New York Elite 15-Black 1568 19-27 41% 15 NY
13993 MJVA 17-2 1568 3-4 43% 17 GA
13994 TW Skyline 16-White 1568 14-15 48% 16 TX
13995 TX FLAMES 13-National 1568 20-22 48% 13 TX
13996 DJRVB 14-N 1568 12-21 36% 14 IN
13997 Meraki VB 13-1 1568 15-17 44% 13 NH
13998 K1 Bayamon Moncho 16-20 1568 4-1 80% 16 PR
13999 HBJ 14-River valley 1568 10-4 71% 14 AR
14000 UVC 12-Blue 1568 4-2 67% 12 TX
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.