Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 266 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13251 RoVo Juniors 14 1577 22-11 67% 14 VA
13252 NGT 16U 1577 12-5 71% 16 GA
13253 Red Rock 14-Eden- walnut creek 1577 18-18 50% 14 CA
13254 ESVBC 16-Tornadoes 1577 26-18 59% 16 IA
13255 HRV 14-1 1577 17-8 68% 14 OR
13256 HorseshoeVBC 18-1 1577 5-3 63% 18 PA
13257 Quicksets 16 1577 20-13 59% 16 HI
13258 Mustang VB Club 18 1577 4-0 100% 18 NY
13259 RVC 14-black (NT) 1577 7-4 64% 14 TX
13260 Intense Adidas 13-Ae 1577 30-19 61% 13 SC
13261 AAVC 14-Silver 1577 13-8 62% 14 CA
13262 ESVBC 13-Dolphins 1577 23-10 70% 13 IA
13263 RCVS 17-1 ale/ruben 1577 9-4 69% 17 PR
13264 SMASH Volleyball 14-Sapphire 1577 6-3 67% 14 MA
13265 REIGN 12-White 1577 8-6 57% 12 FL
13266 Colorado Elite 15-Kodiak 1577 27-25 52% 15 CO
13267 Tenacity 18-1 1577 9-5 64% 18 WI
13268 NorthShore 18-Ferguson 1577 25-11 69% 18 OH
13269 Dayton Jrs 17-Blue 1577 26-24 52% 17 OH
13270 SG Elite 15-Elite leilani 1577 4-4 50% 15 CA
13271 Cloud 16-Girls team phet/chalee 1577 7-4 64% 16 CA
13272 Spikezone VBC 16 1577 10-6 50% 16 GA
13273 Brownsville Dynamite 17-1 1577 14-7 67% 17 TX
13274 CJV 17 National 1577 26-14 65% 17 AR
13275 Titans Astra 16 1577 15-16 48% 16 ON
13276 Chicago Elite 11 Elite 1576 23-12 66% 11 IL
13277 Shasta Elite 14-Chai 1576 7-2 78% 14 CA
13278 Horseshoe 14-1 1576 17-12 52% 14 MT
13279 BRUSA 15 Jim 1576 25-13 66% 15 CA
13280 FaR Out 15 Copper 1576 32-12 73% 15 MI
13281 Air Strike 17 AirStrike Randy 1576 4-1 80% 17 MI
13282 HJV 16 MOLTEN 1576 24-14 63% 16 TX
13283 CUVC 14-Sn lauren 1576 11-10 52% 14 NC
13284 STL Crossfire 16-St1 1576 25-16 60% 16 MO
13285 Dive 17-Blue 1576 31-20 61% 17 CO
13286 OK Charge 11-Ua tulsa 1576 21-15 58% 11 OK
13287 Sportime 14-Black 1576 24-27 47% 14 NY
13288 Rocky Elite 14-Black 1576 28-22 56% 14 CO
13289 Electric City Volleyball Academy 17 Electric City 1576 7-4 64% 17 PA
13290 High Impact 13 1576 14-8 64% 13 CO
13291 Southern Swing 15-Blue 1576 18-15 55% 15 TX
13292 Belle Plaine 14-Black 1576 6-4 60% 14 MN
13293 WACO VBC 15-Ua black 1576 17-16 52% 15 TX
13294 Ut Bounce 12 1576 9-11 38% 12 UT
13295 AVA 12-Blizzards 1576 20-10 65% 12 MA
13296 SA Force 18 National 1576 32-22 59% 18 TX
13297 MAC 12-1 elite 1576 21-17 54% 12 OR
13298 830 VBA 15 1576 17-5 77% 15 TX
13299 Pgh Elite 15 Gold 1576 14-8 64% 15 PA
13300 STL Crossfire 14 SR1 1576 25-14 61% 14 MO
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.