Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 265 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13201 Mill City 16-Blue 1577 21-11 66% 16 MA
13202 Altitude 14-Red 1577 42-27 60% 14 AZ
13203 Aftershock 13-Ross 1577 22-14 59% 13 CA
13204 ForceVC 16-2 1577 25-21 54% 16 OH
13205 TDV 15-Elite 1577 20-24 45% 15 OH
13206 LC Elite 16-1 black 1577 25-19 57% 16 OR
13207 Eagles VBC 14-S 1577 14-4 78% 14 OR
13208 High Voltage 12-1 1577 12-12 50% 12 MN
13209 Momentum Volleyball 13-Brock 1577 29-17 63% 13 CO
13210 Core STL 14-Carolina 1577 23-20 52% 14 MO
13211 Allegiance 18-Royal 1577 27-20 57% 18 TX
13212 Capital Force 14-2 1577 5-1 83% 14 MO
13213 Eagles BEA 13-1 1577 4-1 80% 13 PA
13214 UNION 14-Blue 1577 42-32 57% 14 IN
13215 UVA 12-Steph 1577 3-0 100% 12 LA
13216 NWF Select 14-Watson & kaapa 1577 31-24 56% 14 AL
13217 HVC HALOS 13 1577 22-12 65% 13 TX
13218 SA Juniors 14 Baden 1577 26-17 60% 14 TX
13219 CRSURGEVBC 17 1577 20-15 57% 17 IA
13220 Truepoint 15-S 1577 23-22 51% 15 TX
13221 Desert Elite 17-1 1577 5-4 56% 17 CA
13222 RISE 18-Regional 1577 27-24 53% 18 CA
13223 No Limits 10 1577 2-0 100% 10 NV
13224 Mid-Michigan ACES 12-Layla 1577 4-1 80% 12 MI
13225 516 Elite 15-Ruby 1577 14-11 56% 15 NY
13226 Prime 13 Tammy 1577 26-17 60% 13 CO
13227 SSWolfpack 12-Pups 1577 12-7 57% 12 MA
13228 New Wave 13-S platinum 1577 25-22 53% 13 CA
13229 BVA FC 18-Navy kayla 1577 26-16 62% 18 KY
13230 A5 13-Molina 1577 24-17 59% 13 GA
13231 West Valley Dragons 14-1 1577 24-14 62% 14 OR
13232 HIC 16-Keano 1577 3-3 50% 16 UT
13233 BBVCL 12-Kyle 1577 6-6 50% 12 NV
13234 Angelo Rise 12-1 1577 27-16 63% 12 TX
13235 AVA 18-National 1577 23-21 52% 18 AL
13236 Kokoro VBC 12-1 1577 18-16 53% 12 CA
13237 Laredo Infinity 15-Black 1577 15-9 60% 15 TX
13238 Fr Challenge Elite 12-Legend 1577 11-10 46% 12 TX
13239 Prime 18 adidas 1577 24-19 56% 18 CA
13240 Palm Beach Jrs 11 Elite 1577 4-2 67% 11 FL
13241 De Pere Diggers 14-S blue 1577 8-5 62% 14 WI
13242 OT 14-T jasmyn 1577 32-25 56% 14 FL
13243 MAVS KC 16-2 1577 3-2 60% 16 KS
13244 KIVA 12-Kristi 1577 3-0 100% 12 KY
13245 Horizonvbc 16-1 1577 20-20 50% 16 CA
13246 FaR Out 14 Cardinal 1577 31-13 70% 14 MI
13247 SG Elite 14-Storm 1577 12-5 71% 14 CA
13248 Tri-State Elite 15-Gray 1577 24-16 60% 15 KY
13249 PVA 14-Gray 1577 11-5 69% 14 MO
13250 MAVS KC 17-2 1577 4-1 80% 17 KS
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.