Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 267 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
13301 MJVA 15-Elite gold 1576 24-18 57% 15 TN
13302 Mizuno CNVBC 12-Kristen 1576 15-8 65% 12 MO
13303 OT 13-T angie 1576 31-16 66% 13 FL
13304 TEAM Hiki No 18-1 1576 21-11 66% 18 OR
13305 RVORL 17-1 1576 9-9 50% 17 FL
13306 Metro Volleyball Club 13-Central 1576 21-17 53% 13 DC
13307 Fresno Heat Volleyball Club 12-Black 1576 0-0 0% 12 CA
13308 Kairos 16 Delta 1576 32-20 62% 16 SD
13309 Idaho Show 16-National smith 1576 7-7 50% 16 ID
13310 Kidron VBC Santangelo 17 1576 13-6 68% 17 OH
13311 HP Illinois 14-Gold 1576 2-0 67% 14 MO
13312 SVA 16-Junior 1576 37-35 51% 16 WA
13313 Twisters 12-Felicya 1576 8-7 53% 12 CA
13314 SKC 14-Black 1576 6-3 67% 14 KS
13315 MAVS KC 15-3 1576 4-2 50% 15 KS
13316 Champion 16-N purple 1576 39-23 63% 16 NC
13317 ACT 14-Tuan 1576 21-17 55% 14 CA
13318 Stars 12-Red 1576 10-4 63% 12 ND
13319 Mem Metro 14-Elite gold 1576 32-19 63% 14 TN
13320 STL Crossfire 14 ST1 1576 42-30 58% 14 MO
13321 SA Force 17-2 national 1576 6-3 67% 17 NV
13322 Oly Reign 13 Gold 1576 22-24 48% 13 WA
13323 Windthorst 14-Primetime 1576 4-2 67% 14 TX
13324 Rise 17-Blue 1576 3-1 60% 17 NE
13325 Prime Volleyball 17 Prime BLUE 1576 13-12 46% 17 UT
13326 STARZ 12-Blue 1576 24-13 65% 12 IL
13327 Mem Metro 14-Elite wht 1576 33-19 63% 14 TN
13328 HBJ 13-Falcons 1576 16-7 70% 13 AR
13329 TAV 17-Black 1576 33-26 56% 17 IL
13330 Upstate VBC 12-Pink 1576 9-4 53% 12 NY
13331 MN Select 16-Maroon 1576 40-24 63% 16 MN
13332 Grandlake 15-Woehrmyer 1576 3-2 60% 15 OH
13333 MOVA UA 12 GOLD 1576 41-20 67% 12 MO
13334 SPVC 18-1 1576 5-1 83% 18 GA
13335 CLUB 43 14-1 1576 25-24 51% 14 MN
13336 UEPA 15-G 1576 24-24 48% 15 TX
13337 VOLT 17-1 1576 37-31 54% 17 ND
13338 P3R 15-Monongahela 1576 4-1 80% 15 PA
13339 Shonto 17 1576 5-3 63% 17 CA
13340 AAVC 16-1 1576 6-2 75% 16 NV
13341 Northern Lights 15-W 1576 37-33 53% 15 MN
13342 CJV 13-National white 1576 27-28 49% 13 NC
13343 HRVC 15-National green 1576 24-24 50% 15 NC
13344 IPV 13-Hp 1576 30-12 71% 13 IL
13345 Zero Gravity 16-Orange 1576 4-2 67% 16 OH
13346 Carolina ICE 13 Nat 1576 22-24 48% 13 SC
13347 575 14-Wsl frankie 1576 21-9 66% 14 GA
13348 BVB 13 1575 8-3 73% 13 MN
13349 Michio Chicago 16-Premier 1575 20-26 43% 16 IL
13350 Red Wing 11-White 1575 3-1 75% 11 MN
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.