Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 248 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12351 Ignite VB Club AZ 13-National 1588 4-5 44% 13 NV
12352 WF Elite 17-Black 1588 17-14 49% 17 TX
12353 Platinum 13-Peak 1588 12-13 48% 13 UT
12354 TuoCo Elite 13-S 1588 18-16 53% 13 CA
12355 Starlights 11-Red 1588 6-5 46% 11 TX
12356 KODA 12-Central 1588 11-3 73% 12 NY
12357 Top Select 13-Top white 1588 40-22 65% 13 FL
12358 DVBC Meeker 14-Ivy 1588 3-1 75% 14 CO
12359 No Limits VBC 17-National 1588 4-10 29% 17 NV
12360 501 Volley 14-4 regional 1588 22-8 73% 14 AR
12361 SAFB 15 Firestorm 1588 23-11 68% 15 TX
12362 Central VBC 17-Gold 1588 12-10 55% 17 CA
12363 Redline 17-BLACK 1588 22-11 67% 17 MI
12364 OK Charge 15-Amer tulsa 1588 27-15 64% 15 OK
12365 TW Skyline 12 Royal 1588 21-23 47% 12 TX
12366 TAV 12 1588 24-12 67% 12 TN
12367 MVP 60450 15-Black 1588 10-3 77% 15 IL
12368 BRUSA Volleyball Club 16-Crystal 1588 30-11 73% 16 CA
12369 Academy North 15-Hp-1 1588 44-56 44% 15 CA
12370 BONNEVILLE 14-Trevor 1588 13-6 54% 14 ID
12371 Foley 17-1 1588 6-0 100% 17 MN
12372 NJVBC 17-S ravens 1588 4-1 80% 17 PA
12373 Club Net 16-Premier 1588 29-17 63% 16 AR
12374 Southernmost Volleyball Club 18-1 1588 14-4 78% 18 FL
12375 Mizuno Club North Volleyball 13-1 1588 8-6 57% 13 MO
12376 DN 15-White 1588 10-18 33% 15 TX
12377 787EV 17-Alexie 1588 3-9 25% 17 PR
12378 ETVMR 16-1 1588 3-5 38% 16 MA
12379 Synergy 15 1588 17-8 63% 15 IA
12380 Adversity-WI 17-1 1588 34-25 58% 17 WI
12381 HEAT 10-White 1588 16-11 59% 10 TX
12382 Vital 14-2 royal 1588 43-26 62% 14 MN
12383 Pink Panthers 14 1588 6-3 60% 14 WY
12384 Jr Huskies 14-1 1588 16-11 59% 14 IN
12385 Kenai 16-K 1588 6-4 60% 16 AK
12386 MIDTN Volleyball 13-Blue 1588 35-23 60% 13 TN
12387 FINESSE VOLLEYBALL ACADEMY 13-1 1588 27-16 61% 13 MO
12388 212 Degrees 17 212 Degrees (101) 1588 8-3 73% 17
12389 Colts 13 1588 14-11 50% 13
12390 Pana'ewa 16 1588 5-3 63% 16 HI
12391 Katy United 13-Molten 1588 34-21 61% 13 TX
12392 Adversity-WI 14-1 1588 33-22 60% 14 WI
12393 PV 10-White 1588 3-2 60% 10 IA
12394 Inspired VB 15-Black 1588 41-31 57% 15 MN
12395 Aspire 16-Pink 1587 7-7 50% 16 AB
12396 RVBC 12-White 1587 12-5 71% 12 PA
12397 Volley Pro 14-Black 1587 8-18 30% 14 TX
12398 SVBC Spirit 16-Elite 1587 3-2 60% 16 IA
12399 KVC 17 1587 19-7 68% 17 SC
12400 SVVC 18 1587 6-4 60% 18 KY
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.