2025-2026 Season — Page 248 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12351 | Ignite VB Club AZ 13-National | 1588 | 4-5 | 44% | 13 | NV |
| 12352 | WF Elite 17-Black | 1588 | 17-14 | 49% | 17 | TX |
| 12353 | Platinum 13-Peak | 1588 | 12-13 | 48% | 13 | UT |
| 12354 | TuoCo Elite 13-S | 1588 | 18-16 | 53% | 13 | CA |
| 12355 | Starlights 11-Red | 1588 | 6-5 | 46% | 11 | TX |
| 12356 | KODA 12-Central | 1588 | 11-3 | 73% | 12 | NY |
| 12357 | Top Select 13-Top white | 1588 | 40-22 | 65% | 13 | FL |
| 12358 | DVBC Meeker 14-Ivy | 1588 | 3-1 | 75% | 14 | CO |
| 12359 | No Limits VBC 17-National | 1588 | 4-10 | 29% | 17 | NV |
| 12360 | 501 Volley 14-4 regional | 1588 | 22-8 | 73% | 14 | AR |
| 12361 | SAFB 15 Firestorm | 1588 | 23-11 | 68% | 15 | TX |
| 12362 | Central VBC 17-Gold | 1588 | 12-10 | 55% | 17 | CA |
| 12363 | Redline 17-BLACK | 1588 | 22-11 | 67% | 17 | MI |
| 12364 | OK Charge 15-Amer tulsa | 1588 | 27-15 | 64% | 15 | OK |
| 12365 | TW Skyline 12 Royal | 1588 | 21-23 | 47% | 12 | TX |
| 12366 | TAV 12 | 1588 | 24-12 | 67% | 12 | TN |
| 12367 | MVP 60450 15-Black | 1588 | 10-3 | 77% | 15 | IL |
| 12368 | BRUSA Volleyball Club 16-Crystal | 1588 | 30-11 | 73% | 16 | CA |
| 12369 | Academy North 15-Hp-1 | 1588 | 44-56 | 44% | 15 | CA |
| 12370 | BONNEVILLE 14-Trevor | 1588 | 13-6 | 54% | 14 | ID |
| 12371 | Foley 17-1 | 1588 | 6-0 | 100% | 17 | MN |
| 12372 | NJVBC 17-S ravens | 1588 | 4-1 | 80% | 17 | PA |
| 12373 | Club Net 16-Premier | 1588 | 29-17 | 63% | 16 | AR |
| 12374 | Southernmost Volleyball Club 18-1 | 1588 | 14-4 | 78% | 18 | FL |
| 12375 | Mizuno Club North Volleyball 13-1 | 1588 | 8-6 | 57% | 13 | MO |
| 12376 | DN 15-White | 1588 | 10-18 | 33% | 15 | TX |
| 12377 | 787EV 17-Alexie | 1588 | 3-9 | 25% | 17 | PR |
| 12378 | ETVMR 16-1 | 1588 | 3-5 | 38% | 16 | MA |
| 12379 | Synergy 15 | 1588 | 17-8 | 63% | 15 | IA |
| 12380 | Adversity-WI 17-1 | 1588 | 34-25 | 58% | 17 | WI |
| 12381 | HEAT 10-White | 1588 | 16-11 | 59% | 10 | TX |
| 12382 | Vital 14-2 royal | 1588 | 43-26 | 62% | 14 | MN |
| 12383 | Pink Panthers 14 | 1588 | 6-3 | 60% | 14 | WY |
| 12384 | Jr Huskies 14-1 | 1588 | 16-11 | 59% | 14 | IN |
| 12385 | Kenai 16-K | 1588 | 6-4 | 60% | 16 | AK |
| 12386 | MIDTN Volleyball 13-Blue | 1588 | 35-23 | 60% | 13 | TN |
| 12387 | FINESSE VOLLEYBALL ACADEMY 13-1 | 1588 | 27-16 | 61% | 13 | MO |
| 12388 | 212 Degrees 17 212 Degrees (101) | 1588 | 8-3 | 73% | 17 | |
| 12389 | Colts 13 | 1588 | 14-11 | 50% | 13 | |
| 12390 | Pana'ewa 16 | 1588 | 5-3 | 63% | 16 | HI |
| 12391 | Katy United 13-Molten | 1588 | 34-21 | 61% | 13 | TX |
| 12392 | Adversity-WI 14-1 | 1588 | 33-22 | 60% | 14 | WI |
| 12393 | PV 10-White | 1588 | 3-2 | 60% | 10 | IA |
| 12394 | Inspired VB 15-Black | 1588 | 41-31 | 57% | 15 | MN |
| 12395 | Aspire 16-Pink | 1587 | 7-7 | 50% | 16 | AB |
| 12396 | RVBC 12-White | 1587 | 12-5 | 71% | 12 | PA |
| 12397 | Volley Pro 14-Black | 1587 | 8-18 | 30% | 14 | TX |
| 12398 | SVBC Spirit 16-Elite | 1587 | 3-2 | 60% | 16 | IA |
| 12399 | KVC 17 | 1587 | 19-7 | 68% | 17 | SC |
| 12400 | SVVC 18 | 1587 | 6-4 | 60% | 18 | KY |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.