Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 247 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12301 Metro VBC 14-Black 1589 31-25 55% 14 IN
12302 SA Elite 18-1 navy 1589 28-22 56% 18 TX
12303 PIVC Storm 13-P hannah 1589 28-21 57% 13 AL
12304 Niagara Athletics Volleyball Club 16 Athletics ACES 1589 4-2 67% 16
12305 SC 14 1589 21-12 54% 14
12306 Defensa 14-Cj 1589 4-1 80% 14 ON
12307 Tstreet 16-Savannah 1588 7-3 70% 16 CA
12308 Team Momentum B18 Navy 1588 22-16 56% 18 MO
12309 Platinum 16-Apex 1588 25-24 51% 16 UT
12310 NPJ Portland 16 Premier 1588 38-29 57% 16 OR
12311 Vikings 17-Red 1588 7-2 78% 17 MN
12312 Weber Elite Volleyball Club 14 Cary 1588 12-5 63% 14 UT
12313 HICVB 16-1 1588 3-1 75% 16 NV
12314 NWAS Kelso 16 Alpha 1588 40-16 71% 16 OR
12315 Phoenix 12-Pink 1588 5-5 50% 12 OH
12316 NE Elite 11-All set 1588 20-19 51% 11 NE
12317 Capital Ice 13 1588 21-26 45% 13 WA
12318 CLUB LEGACY 14-Echo 1588 5-2 71% 14 NE
12319 Lady Spartans 16 1588 7-3 70% 16 NC
12320 Val Verde Victory 11-1 fusion 1588 3-0 75% 11 TX
12321 NVPUR 10-Lizardi 1588 5-1 83% 10 PR
12322 SOINE 11-1 1588 16-9 64% 11 KY
12323 Pitt United 17-Red 1588 36-20 64% 17 PA
12324 HP Illinois 12-Peach 1588 3-0 75% 12 MO
12325 Zona VBC 16-R2 1588 19-4 83% 16 AZ
12326 HVC 15-Black 1588 18-8 69% 15 IN
12327 Kids America 14-Lydic 1588 8-3 73% 14 OH
12328 SoCal VBC 14-Frazee 1588 18-20 47% 14 CA
12329 Valor-AR 15-Elite 1588 38-40 49% 15 AR
12330 TI Elite 12-Thundercats 1588 32-31 51% 12 IN
12331 Victory 16-Nat'l black 1588 7-2 78% 16 TX
12332 Avidity 16-Onyx 1588 19-23 45% 16 MA
12333 Empower Volleyball Club of Eastvale 12-National 1588 33-14 70% 12 CA
12334 Invasion VBC 14-Gold 1588 4-1 80% 14 MO
12335 Fearless Spirit 18-1 1588 28-15 65% 18 AR
12336 Phoenix 12-Red 1588 6-3 67% 12 OH
12337 Synergy 15-Phillips 1588 5-1 83% 15 OH
12338 LRVBC 18-1 1588 4-6 40% 18 NY
12339 Actyve 14-Adidas 1588 20-18 53% 14 CA
12340 Legacy Elite 17 Warriors 1588 19-9 68% 17 VA
12341 Elkhart 14-Lions 1588 4-1 80% 14 IN
12342 CSV 17-1 1588 10-6 63% 17 CA
12343 Fog Rage 14 1588 5-2 71% 14 CA
12344 NEA Tomahawks 17-Pink 1588 18-14 56% 17 TN
12345 Paynesville 12-S 1588 4-1 80% 12 MN
12346 FaR Out 16 Silver 1588 29-10 74% 16 MI
12347 Pipeline 12-Swift ashley 1588 21-12 64% 12 CA
12348 adidas DYNASTY 16-3 1588 4-1 67% 16 KS
12349 Maggie 12-Nat sowal 1588 4-1 80% 12 AL
12350 diggersz 14-Black jamie 1588 17-9 57% 14 IL
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.