2025-2026 Season — Page 246 · Ranked by Elo rating
Rankings last updated:
The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.
| # | Team | Elo | Record | Win% | Age | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12251 | TI Elite 14 Melissa | 1589 | 25-17 | 60% | 14 | IN |
| 12252 | Uno Girls 13-Elite | 1589 | 19-10 | 66% | 13 | IL |
| 12253 | 407 14-Blue | 1589 | 37-36 | 51% | 14 | FL |
| 12254 | Platform 15-Molten | 1589 | 27-21 | 56% | 15 | IA |
| 12255 | 1United 13-Prep | 1589 | 14-7 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 12256 | ATOM 16-Red | 1589 | 28-33 | 46% | 16 | FL |
| 12257 | Suwannee Elite 18-1 | 1589 | 5-3 | 63% | 18 | FL |
| 12258 | Acers Volleyball Club 16-Black | 1589 | 19-22 | 42% | 16 | WI |
| 12259 | VC United 17-3 elite | 1589 | 29-14 | 67% | 17 | IL |
| 12260 | GVA 15-White | 1589 | 10-7 | 59% | 15 | PR |
| 12261 | ProPlay 15 Terry | 1589 | 26-22 | 54% | 15 | CA |
| 12262 | VIBE Volleyball 15-U nelson | 1589 | 5-3 | 63% | 15 | CA |
| 12263 | CITY 15-1 | 1589 | 15-6 | 60% | 15 | NY |
| 12264 | Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 13-T jt | 1589 | 17-12 | 59% | 13 | NJ |
| 12265 | Columbia 15-Black | 1589 | 26-34 | 43% | 15 | MD |
| 12266 | 360 Volleyball Club 14 14 Kaos Black | 1589 | 4-3 | 57% | 14 | TX |
| 12267 | 863 Elite 17-1 black | 1589 | 33-22 | 60% | 17 | FL |
| 12268 | Central Kansas Rampage 13-1 | 1589 | 9-4 | 64% | 13 | KS |
| 12269 | WAVE 15 Chameleons | 1589 | 27-13 | 68% | 15 | IN |
| 12270 | Inspire Volleyball Club 15-National | 1589 | 45-32 | 56% | 15 | AK |
| 12271 | ECVC 16-White | 1589 | 22-16 | 58% | 16 | VA |
| 12272 | MKE Sting 11-Black | 1589 | 27-18 | 60% | 11 | WI |
| 12273 | Atomic Force 11-Maroon | 1589 | 6-3 | 67% | 11 | MN |
| 12274 | Hammerin Hawks 10-S | 1589 | 3-1 | 60% | 10 | IA |
| 12275 | Sunshine 18 Westside | 1589 | 24-21 | 53% | 18 | CA |
| 12276 | Mililani 13-1 | 1589 | 7-6 | 54% | 13 | HI |
| 12277 | Rancho 14-Select | 1589 | 21-20 | 51% | 14 | CA |
| 12278 | Iowa Vibe 14-3 ombre | 1589 | 9-4 | 60% | 14 | IA |
| 12279 | LA6 11 | 1589 | 18-17 | 50% | 11 | LA |
| 12280 | Paramount VBC 12 Yasemin | 1589 | 43-27 | 61% | 12 | VA |
| 12281 | SIVBA 12U GREY | 1589 | 17-10 | 61% | 12 | MO |
| 12282 | Omni 12-N2 | 1589 | 40-19 | 68% | 12 | AZ |
| 12283 | SA Destination 13-1 | 1589 | 26-10 | 67% | 13 | TX |
| 12284 | A5 12-Eric | 1589 | 28-18 | 61% | 12 | GA |
| 12285 | Soar Volleyball Club 16 16 Kayla/Taylor | 1589 | 25-14 | 64% | 16 | AL |
| 12286 | CPAC 18-Black | 1589 | 5-1 | 83% | 18 | SD |
| 12287 | Kokoro Volleyball 16 Blk | 1589 | 44-20 | 69% | 16 | MN |
| 12288 | PIVC Storm 18 Billy | 1589 | 25-20 | 56% | 18 | AL |
| 12289 | Waco Jrs 13-Ua black | 1589 | 1-3 | 25% | 13 | TX |
| 12290 | CLBRK 15-1 | 1589 | 13-7 | 65% | 15 | WI |
| 12291 | Split Mountain Volleyball Club 17 Split Mountain Kris | 1589 | 6-1 | 75% | 17 | UT |
| 12292 | Vancouver Volleyball Club 15-Moon | 1589 | 6-1 | 86% | 15 | OR |
| 12293 | Starlings West Tucson 13-Blue | 1589 | 34-25 | 57% | 13 | AZ |
| 12294 | MPV 13-National green | 1589 | 32-27 | 52% | 13 | UT |
| 12295 | JJVA Club 18-A | 1589 | 19-7 | 73% | 18 | FL |
| 12296 | REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 18 REACH DYNASTY | 1589 | 8-3 | 73% | 18 | PA |
| 12297 | Hometown Heat 14-Ignite | 1589 | 22-13 | 63% | 14 | WI |
| 12298 | Grandlake 13-Hardesty | 1589 | 4-2 | 67% | 13 | OH |
| 12299 | AJV 16 Navy | 1589 | 29-21 | 58% | 16 | TX |
| 12300 | Infinity Volleyball Club 12-Green | 1589 | 9-7 | 56% | 12 | OH |
All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.
Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.
When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.
Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.
Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.
Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.