Youth Club Girls Volleyball Team Rankings

2025-2026 Season — Page 246 · Ranked by Elo rating

Rankings last updated:

The VolleyLens Youth Club Girls Volleyball Rankings track over 4,000 girls volleyball teams across all 50 states using an Elo rating system updated after every match. Data is aggregated from multiple tournament sources including USAV, AAU/JVA, and regional qualifiers. The current #1 ranked team is Legacy 14-1 adidas with a 2630 Elo rating and 80-6 record. Rankings reflect the 2025-2026 season and are based on over 500,000 tracked matches.

Run a club? Your club is already listed here with its teams, results and ranking. Claim it free to fix the details and add the verified badge.
What claiming gets you →
Youth Club Volleyball Power Rankings
Comprehensive girls youth club volleyball rankings using advanced Elo rating system. Track team performance, win percentages, and match statistics.
Club Volleyball Standings
Real-time volleyball club standings and power rankings for competitive youth volleyball. Compare team strengths and discover top-performing clubs.
Volleyball Analytics & Statistics
Advanced volleyball analytics including Elo ratings, match history, and performance metrics. The ultimate resource for girls volleyball rankings.
#TeamEloRecordWin%AgeState
12251 TI Elite 14 Melissa 1589 25-17 60% 14 IN
12252 Uno Girls 13-Elite 1589 19-10 66% 13 IL
12253 407 14-Blue 1589 37-36 51% 14 FL
12254 Platform 15-Molten 1589 27-21 56% 15 IA
12255 1United 13-Prep 1589 14-7 67% 13 TX
12256 ATOM 16-Red 1589 28-33 46% 16 FL
12257 Suwannee Elite 18-1 1589 5-3 63% 18 FL
12258 Acers Volleyball Club 16-Black 1589 19-22 42% 16 WI
12259 VC United 17-3 elite 1589 29-14 67% 17 IL
12260 GVA 15-White 1589 10-7 59% 15 PR
12261 ProPlay 15 Terry 1589 26-22 54% 15 CA
12262 VIBE Volleyball 15-U nelson 1589 5-3 63% 15 CA
12263 CITY 15-1 1589 15-6 60% 15 NY
12264 Sideout Sports Volleyball Club 13-T jt 1589 17-12 59% 13 NJ
12265 Columbia 15-Black 1589 26-34 43% 15 MD
12266 360 Volleyball Club 14 14 Kaos Black 1589 4-3 57% 14 TX
12267 863 Elite 17-1 black 1589 33-22 60% 17 FL
12268 Central Kansas Rampage 13-1 1589 9-4 64% 13 KS
12269 WAVE 15 Chameleons 1589 27-13 68% 15 IN
12270 Inspire Volleyball Club 15-National 1589 45-32 56% 15 AK
12271 ECVC 16-White 1589 22-16 58% 16 VA
12272 MKE Sting 11-Black 1589 27-18 60% 11 WI
12273 Atomic Force 11-Maroon 1589 6-3 67% 11 MN
12274 Hammerin Hawks 10-S 1589 3-1 60% 10 IA
12275 Sunshine 18 Westside 1589 24-21 53% 18 CA
12276 Mililani 13-1 1589 7-6 54% 13 HI
12277 Rancho 14-Select 1589 21-20 51% 14 CA
12278 Iowa Vibe 14-3 ombre 1589 9-4 60% 14 IA
12279 LA6 11 1589 18-17 50% 11 LA
12280 Paramount VBC 12 Yasemin 1589 43-27 61% 12 VA
12281 SIVBA 12U GREY 1589 17-10 61% 12 MO
12282 Omni 12-N2 1589 40-19 68% 12 AZ
12283 SA Destination 13-1 1589 26-10 67% 13 TX
12284 A5 12-Eric 1589 28-18 61% 12 GA
12285 Soar Volleyball Club 16 16 Kayla/Taylor 1589 25-14 64% 16 AL
12286 CPAC 18-Black 1589 5-1 83% 18 SD
12287 Kokoro Volleyball 16 Blk 1589 44-20 69% 16 MN
12288 PIVC Storm 18 Billy 1589 25-20 56% 18 AL
12289 Waco Jrs 13-Ua black 1589 1-3 25% 13 TX
12290 CLBRK 15-1 1589 13-7 65% 15 WI
12291 Split Mountain Volleyball Club 17 Split Mountain Kris 1589 6-1 75% 17 UT
12292 Vancouver Volleyball Club 15-Moon 1589 6-1 86% 15 OR
12293 Starlings West Tucson 13-Blue 1589 34-25 57% 13 AZ
12294 MPV 13-National green 1589 32-27 52% 13 UT
12295 JJVA Club 18-A 1589 19-7 73% 18 FL
12296 REACH VOLLEYBALL CLUB 18 REACH DYNASTY 1589 8-3 73% 18 PA
12297 Hometown Heat 14-Ignite 1589 22-13 63% 14 WI
12298 Grandlake 13-Hardesty 1589 4-2 67% 13 OH
12299 AJV 16 Navy 1589 29-21 58% 16 TX
12300 Infinity Volleyball Club 12-Green 1589 9-7 56% 12 OH
← Previous1234567891011121314151617181920Next →

Ranking Methodology

Elo Rating System

All teams start with a base rating of 1500 points. Ratings rise after wins and fall after losses, and the amount of change depends on the relative strength of the opponents — beating a stronger team gives more points than beating a weaker team. Matches are processed in chronological order so ratings evolve match-by-match.

Match Result Quality

Not every win is treated the same. A blended result quality score combines set margin (sweeps weigh more than three-set wins), point margin (total point differential, with diminishing returns on blowouts), and the binary match outcome. Dominant performances are rewarded without the system overreacting to runaway games.

Age-Adjusted Updates (Playing Up)

When youth teams cross age groups within the same gender, the older team receives an effective rating premium for the expected-outcome calculation. This corrects for the physical maturity gap that pure rating can’t see, so younger teams aren’t over-rewarded for competitive losses and older teams aren’t under-rewarded for expected wins. The adjustment is capped to avoid extrapolating into very large age gaps.

Tournament Division Strength

Top-tier brackets such as Invitational and Open carry more weight than entry-level divisions. Wins in stronger divisions earn amplified rating gains, while losses in those divisions are softened — playing up shouldn’t punish teams that lost to elite competition. Lower divisions follow the inverse pattern, so schedule strength flows directly into the ranking.

New Team Calibration

Brand-new teams enter at the 1500 baseline but have unknown true strength. During a team’s first stretch of matches their ratings move faster, so newcomers reach their real level quickly. Once a team has played enough matches, the boost is removed and updates settle into the standard cadence.

Team Data Aggregation

Tracks each team across all their participations and tournaments. Uses the highest Elo rating achieved for the ranking table, and aggregates all matches played for win/loss statistics. Filters keep gender and age group consistent within each leaderboard.